
JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES
Latest Jobs Posts
Ukrainians Views on the Trump-Zelensky Meeting in the Oval Office
Many Ukrainians closely followed President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to Washington, where Ukraine and the United States planned to sign an agreement on rare earth metals. According to the American side, this deal was intended to pave the way for a ceasefire in Ukraine. However, a verbal spat between President Donald Trump, Vice President James Vance, and President Zelensky turned everything upside down.
Where Democrats Can Aim for in the 2026 Midterms: Senate Edition
After two months into Donald Trump’s second presidency, many voters and Congresspeople are already eyeing the 2026 Congressional elections. The November 3rd elections could mark a pivotal moment in President Donald Trump’s second term.
Tangled Part 1: How Trump uses Machiavelli to Win An Election
Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince provides a playbook for rulers to seize, hold, and consolidate power. Donald Trump’s second ascent to the Oval Office demonstrates that Machiavelli’s lessons are just as valid in 2025 as they were in 1515. The Prince is frequently summarized with the adage of “the ends justify the means”.
Introducing Gulf of America – from the person who gave us Trump Tower
For the last 475 years, the expanse of ocean from western Florida to southern Texas has been called the “Gulf of Mexico.” English geographer Richard Hakluyt referred to the “Gulfe of Mexico” in his work of 1589. With the stroke of a pen on February 9, 2025, the President of the United States signed Executive Order 14172 and renamed the body of water “Gulf of America.” In addition to “restoring American pride,” President Trump justified the name change by referencing territorial rights over much of the area and that those waters have “long been an integral asset to our once burgeoning Nation and has remained an indelible part of America.” Trump considers the Gulf a business asset.
Argentinian Resistance: Austerity’s Failures
The Argentinian people have had enough. On 12 March 2025, the people of Buenos Aires took to the street to protests President Javier Milei’s policy of extreme austerity. The protesters showed anger at the weakness of their pension system exposed by these policies. In reaction, the government sent out police; senior citizens and soccer fans were then blasted with firehoses, teargassed, and shot with rubber bullets Ghastly images and videos have emerged of badly wounded protesters voicing their desperation to the riot police.
Legal Battles: The Quiet Yet Powerful Resistance of the State Attorneys General
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), established under the Trump administration and led by Elon Musk, has embarked on an ambitious mission to streamline federal operations by significantly reducing the workforce across various agencies. This initiative aims to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget during the 2025-2026 fiscal year, primarily through substantial layoffs and restructuring efforts. While proponents argue that these measures are necessary to eliminate inefficiencies and reduce government spending, critics warn of potential disruptions to essential public services and the erosion of institutional knowledge within federal agencies.
Musk’s Outrageous Conflicts of Interest
Distaste for Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is fueling protests at Tesla showrooms, a boycott of the company’s cars, and a rapidly deteriorating stock price. But Musk can easily make up the losses from the federal government he is gleefully gutting. Musk is poised to continue making billions from federal subsidies and contracts despite the obvious ethical problems.
The Ripple Effect: DOGE’s Workforce Reduction and Its Impact on Federal Agencies
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), established under the Trump administration and led by Elon Musk, has embarked on an ambitious mission to streamline federal operations by significantly reducing the workforce across various agencies. This initiative aims to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget during the 2025-2026 fiscal year, primarily through substantial layoffs and restructuring efforts. While proponents argue that these measures are necessary to eliminate inefficiencies and reduce government spending, critics warn of potential disruptions to essential public services and the erosion of institutional knowledge within federal agencies.
Our Values
Dear President Trump, last month we wrote wishing you well on your 2nd term in Office. This month we write to express concern about the negative tone your administration has put forward in many of it policies and pronouncements. We’d like to remind you of the values that are most important for a President to preserve when he or she serves as the custodian of our democracy.


The Impact on Public Safety When Trump Tries to Downsize the Government
Election & Politics #175 | By: Naja Barnes | March 20, 2025
Featured Photo: CDC
On February 11th, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the federal workforce and to reduce the size of the government and federal spending. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is executing that mission, echoing the need to regulate government spending and amplify government efficiency. Recently Musks’s actions to summarily layoff federal workers have been successfully challenged in the courts. In all probability the Trump administration will appeal some of the court decisions; so it remains to be seen whether or not Trump’s downsizing of the federal workforce will succeed.
The downsizing of the United States government has resulted in thousands of federal employees being laid off, bought out, and pressured into quitting. That reality highlights the contradiction of DOGE’s mission to increase government efficiency. The massive firings of critical departments in government directly threaten government proficiency, potentially hindering its efficiency due to the lack of people needed for certain departments to succeed in their missions and duties.
That predicament poses a question: What will suffer from Trump’s mission to downsize the government?
Among the federal employees who were fired were those who worked for the Department of the Interior and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. A common thread among these departments is their mission to protect public safety, which could be threatened by DOGE’s plan to downsize the United States government.
Analysis
The Department of the Interior
Around February 14th, 2025, the government firings began affecting the Department of the Interior, which protects and manages the natural resources and cultural heritage of the United States. Thousands of National Park Service staff were also fired, such as Park Rangers, who work to protect and preserve public lands, state parks, and monuments. Their general duties include greeting visitors, providing guided tours, maintaining the parks, ensuring that visitors are following the law, and protecting the wildlife. Park Rangers’ duties are necessary in ensuring the public’s safety, and their absence may be felt and negatively impact the wildlife, the environment, and the humans they serve.
When someone is lost, hurt, or unable to get to safety, Park Rangers are trained to be first responders in an Emergency. They often lead rescue missions, provide medical assistance, and call for help. Park Rangers also ensure public safety by monitoring the wildlife in the area, tracking animal movements, and educating visitors on the area and potential dangers posed by wildlife.
Park Rangers ensure the safety of wildlife by protecting them from poachers and reckless visitors. Their upkeep of the parks positively affects the wildlife by ensuring that their habitats are habitable.
Some Park Rangers are trained to handle firefighting in instances of wildfires. They also work with local communities to promote conservation efforts, replanting native vegetation and removing harmful and evasive species.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is responsible for addressing housing needs, improving communities, and enforcing fair housing laws through community development. In January 2024, HUD reported that approximately 770,000 people experienced houselessness. That number is presumed to increase due to the massive government firings and downsizing. DOGE plans to reduce HUD’s staffing by half, which will affect local nonprofits’ ability to receive funding to provide housing, rental assistance, and health access to communities that need it.
With the lack of funding and manpower needed to provide homes and resources for the unhoused, public safety issues may increase. The threat that houselessness poses to public safety is the increased vulnerability of unhoused people to violence and criminalization.
Those who are unhoused are increasingly exposed to harm and violence due to the lack of access to safe and secure shelter. Acts of violence against unhoused people are thought to be motivated by the perpetrator’s bias of the unhoused community and how houselessness is discussed in society. This violence could be exacerbated by the criminalization of houselessness, which punishes those who participate in activities in public, such as sleeping, eating, and asking for money. Those actions could bring criminal penalties to those unhoused, such as jail time, fines, and arrests, which only cause more harm and obstacles for those in need of shelter.
In conclusion, downsizing the United States Government may decrease government spending but increase other issues, such as threats to public safety. It may also affect the government’s ability to do its job efficiently, conflicting with DOGE’s mission to increase government efficiency.
Engagement Resources
- We all suffer from federal workforce cuts
https://www.selc.org/news/we-all-suffer-from-federal-workforce-cuts/ - https://www.npca.org/, an independent nonpartisan membership organization dedicated to advocating on behalf of the National Park System
- Trump administration plans mass firing at office that funds homelessness programs
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/22/g-s1-50199/doge-trump-hud-cuts-homeless-housing-programs - How the Trump Administration is Harming People and Undermining Government
https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/executive-action-watch?item=29683

The Week That Was: Global News in Review
The Week That Was: Global News in Review
Foreign Policy #194 | By: Ibrahim Castro | March 14, 2025
Featured Photo by Getty Images
__________________________________
US added to international watchlist for rapid decline in freedoms
March Watchlist 2025 The new CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist highlights serious concerns regarding the exercise of civic freedoms https://monitor.civicus.org/watchlist-march-2025/
The United States in early March was added to the CIVICUS Monitor Human Rights Watchlist. CIVICUS is a global research organization that studies and publishes the status of freedoms and threats to civil liberties in various countries around the world each year. CIVICUS has pointed to Trump’s erratic use of executive orders, mass firings of federal workers, dismantling of foreign aid programs, antagonism of journalists and efforts to tamp down pro-Palestinian protests as just some of the reasons for the change in the United States status.
The US has been classified as “narrowed” the “narrowed” label is CIVICUS’ assessment that while most people are still able to exercise their rights of expression, free speech, and assembly, there are ongoing and concerning attempts to violate these rights by the government. CIVICUS co-Secretary General Mandeep Tiwana stated that “Restrictive executive orders, unjustifiable institutional cutbacks, and intimidation tactics through threatening pronouncements by senior officials in the administration are creating an atmosphere to chill democratic dissent, a cherished American ideal”. The White House in response has rejected CIVICUS’ assessment, with Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly stating “This is nonsense: President Trump is leading the most transparent administration in history”.
Ukraine accepts US backed ceasefire deal but Russia is on the fence
US and Ukraine officials sit together at peace talks hosted in Saudi Arabia. Getty Images
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced this week that Ukraine has accepted the 30-day ceasefire deal after peace talks with the United States in Saudi Arabia. Washington has in turn lifted its pause on military aid and intelligence sharing with Kyiv. The ceasefire proposal is only eight paragraphs long, with meagre details beyond the desire to rapidly press ahead and does not mention any security guarantees to Ukraine. It does include the promise of both sides to exchange prisoners of war, the release of civilian detainees, and the return of forcibly transferred Ukrainian children to Russia.
Russian President Putin says he accepts the deal in principle but calls for more details before it is finalized.
Former Philippine President under arrest
Duterte speaking at a rally on Sunday. Two days later, he was arrested at an airport in Manila. Vernon Yuen/AP
Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has been placed in the custody of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Netherlands following his arrest in Manila earlier this week. His arrest comes after his time as president where he oversaw a years-long anti-drugs crackdown that left thousands of Filipino citizens dead in its wake. The ICC confirmed it had issued an arrest warrant for Duterte on charges of the crime of murder as a crime against humanity, for actions it alleges were committed between November 1, 2011 and March 16, 2019.
Duterte withdrew the Philippines from the ICC in 2019, a move condemned by critics as an effort to shield himself from accountability. But under the ICC’s withdrawal mechanism, the court keeps jurisdiction over crimes committed during the membership period of a state, which in this case, is between 2016, when his term started, and 2019 when he pulled the Philippines out. Duterte is still supported politically within the country. His daughter Sara Duterte, who is the country’s vice president, has condemned her fathers arrest.
Violence against Alawites in Syria
A Syrian man walks past burnt out cars in Jableh town, south of Latakia, following a spate of violence between Syrian security forces and armed groups loyal to deposed president Bashar al-Assad in Syria’s coastal region [Moawia Atrash/Picture Alliance via Getty Images]
More than 1,000 people have been killed in two days of clashes between security forces linked to Syria’s new government and fighters from Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite sect in the country’s coastal region. The Alawite community is the second-largest religious group in Syria after Sunni Muslims. The recent clashes began after coordinated attacks by gunmen loyal to the Assad regime killed over 200 members of the new government’s security forces. In response, government forces along with aligned armed groups carried out reprisal attacks in Alawite villages throughout the region killing hundreds of civilians. Syria’s interim President Ahmed Sharaa said the deadly violence is a threat to his mission to unite the country and announced the formation of a fact-finding committee to investigate the violations against civilians and find those responsible for them.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

The Pettiness of President Trump Targeting Law Firms For Revenge
The Pettiness of President Trump Targeting Law Firms For Revenge
Civil Rights Policy #238 | By: Rodney Maggay | March 12, 2025
Featured Photo by EPA
__________________________________
On February 25, 2025 President Donald Trump signed an executive order suspending the security clearances of lawyers and staff at the Washington, D.C. law office of the international law firm Covington & Burling. The firm had provided legal services to former Special Prosecutor Jack Smith.
Jack Smith had been appointed by former Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Donald Trump for a range of activities after he left the White House in 2021. Mr. Smith eventually brought two criminal cases against Mr. Trump. The first criminal case was centered around charges of election interference by Mr. Trump regarding the 2020 presidential election that Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden. The other criminal case centered around charges that Mr. Trump impermissibly hoarded top secret government documents after he left office. These two cases were set to go to trial but faced numerous legal delays. After Mr. Trump won the 2024 presidential election, Jack Smith reluctantly dismissed the two criminal cases against Mr. Trump because of the Department of Justice (DOJ) policy that forbids the prosecution of a sitting president. This comes on the heels of Mr. Trump making a number of threats and promises of retribution should he win the presidential election. Mr. Trump’s executive order is not aimed at Jack Smith himself but only at the lawyers and their staff who agreed to represent Mr. Smith because of the threats of retribution that came from Mr. Trump and his allies.
Additionally on March 6th, 2025, President Trump canceled federal clearances for specific members of the law firm Perkins Coie, LLP (Perkins Coie) because of connections to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Trump’s order also ordered any and all federal agencies that have existing federal contracts with Perkins Coie to immediately cancel those contracts. Trump’s order also criticized the firm’s diversity hiring practices and a number of reasons that have often been characterized as unfounded conspiracy theories.
Analysis
The orders signed by President Trump do not specifically go after Jack Smith or Hillary Clinton. The orders are directed at those at the law firm who have a connection to Mr. Smith and Mrs. Clinton due to the legal services they provided to both persons. This is a very dangerous legal road for the President to go down.
The reason why the President’s actions are troubling is because the orders are punishing a law firm and their staff for actions that are perfectly legal. Jack Smith and Hillary Clinton were provided legal services by Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie, respectively, which Smith and Clinton are entitled to and which the law firms are permitted to provide. The only reason why President Trump is now targeting the law firms and their staff is because of the President’s desire for revenge against Jack Smith and Hillary Clinton. The President is angry that he was charged with crimes in two criminal cases by Jack Smith and the President has had a long running animosity against Mrs. Clinton.
But the interesting part of Mr. Trump’s orders are that they are targeting the lawyers and staff of the law firm even though the firms did not provide any legal services connected to the criminal prosecutions of Mr. Trump. The law firm Covington & Burling has stated in a statement that they represent Jack Smith in his “personal, individual capacity” and that they only agreed to represent Smith “when it became apparent that he would become subject of a government investigation.” What this means is that President Trump is not revoking the security clearances based on any work that may have been done by Covington & Burling regarding the criminal cases Jack Smith brought against the President because it is clear that they did not participate in the investigation at all. The revocation of the security clearances is only being done because the law firm decided to represent Jack Smith after Trump’s rhetoric of retribution against his perceived political enemies. It is an element of guilt by association and nothing more. Jack Smith could very well have chosen another law firm or lawyer to represent him and Trump would have still focused his revenge on whatever legal counsel Mr. Smith would have chosen. By revoking security clearances, Mr. Trump is trying to shame the firm and possibly prevent other non – Trump related federal work contracts from being awarded to the law firm, similar to his order to cancel federal contracts with Perkins Coie simply because they represented Mrs. Clinton in the past. Quite simply, the orders are small and petty moves currently undertaken by the man sitting in the Oval Office.
Furthermore, Trump’s actions may very well have a chilling effect. If lawyers and law firms perceive that there is a great risk to providing legal services to Jack Smith or Hillary Clinton, some attorneys and law firms might think twice about representing those persons. They might not want to risk their financial well – being (loss of business opportunities or contracts with the federal government) or reputation because of the pettiness of the President. Law firms might simply decide to stay away from representing Smith or Clinton for now. And this also leads to what might happen with Smith and Clinton on a personal level. If law firms are wary about representing Mr. Smith and Mrs. Clinton, then what options are available for them to secure legal representation? They might certainly need legal counsel for non – Trump related activities in the future. Should they be shut out from competent legal representation because of a law firm’s fear at being associated with either Mr. Smith or Mrs. Clinton?
In the U.S., everyone is entitled to legal representation. Even murderers and other undesirables are entitled to competent legal representation. But the way President Trump has crafted his orders, it appears that he wants to scare anyone and everyone off from assisting with Mr. Smith and Mrs. Clinton. Mr. Trump does not need to do this but it appears his desire for petty revenge is more important to him than being the leader and unifier that this country needs right now. LEARN MORE, LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
-
The Independent – a quick history of Trump’s attacks on law firms dating to the 2016 election.
-
MSN – former GOP chair criticizes Trump for revenge antics against law firms.
This brief was compiled by Rod Maggay. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief, please contact rodwood@email.com.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

Utah, Fluoride, and the Public Water System Panic
Utah, Fluoride, and the Public Water System Panic
Health & Gender Policy #180 | By: Nate Iglehart | March 12, 2025
Featured Photo: FOOD & WINE / GETTY IMAGES
__________________________________
Science is ever-evolving. When new information comes out, it is protocol to test it rigorously and check every assumption along the way. But what happens when the public takes a single new data point as gospel?
In the last few years, there has been a sharp increase in skepticism about the health effects of putting fluoride in public drinking water. Fluoride, a natural mineral, helps to prevent tooth decay by strengthening and rebuilding weakened tooth enamel. It was introduced into public water systems in the U.S. in 1945, and by 2020 72.7% of the U.S. population on a community water source were3 receiving fluopridated water..
For as long as it’s been in water systems, there have been studies on its effects, with the vast majority finding it beneficial to include.
But Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s new Secretary of Health and Human Services, has led the latest charge against water fluoridation. In a social media post before Trump took office, RFK Jr. said “the Trump White House will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water.” His concerns include higher risks for cancer and lower cognitive function in children, amongst a host of other health issues.
Americans are increasingly uneasy about fluoride, some are beginning to weigh the health benefits far lighter than the fear of perceived unknown effects. Utah has taken the lead, with a bill heading for Governor Spencer Cox’s desk that would make the state the first to ban fluoride in public water.
Analysis
There are myriad studies on the health effects of water fluoridation. On the cancer front, in 2011 California found that “fluoride and its salts have not been clearly shown to cause cancer.” The Dana Farber Cancer Institute also says that “overwhelming research shows that there is no reason to believe that fluoride, when used in an approved manner, causes any disease, including cancer,” while the National Cancer Institute concurs.
The worries about cognitive functioning in children, however, stem from a recent study by the National Toxicology Program that found higher levels of fluoride exposure (more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter) associated with lower IQ in children. This appears to have helped motivate a September 25th decision by a federal judge in California ordering the EPA to strengthen regulations for fluoride in drinking water.
Both of these have asterisks. The study explicitly states that “there was insufficient data to determine if the low fluoride level of 0.7 mg/L currently recommended for U.S. community water supplies has a negative effect on children’s IQ” and also found no evidence of adverse effects on adult cognition. In the judge’s case, he stressed he was not concluding with certainty that fluoridated water endangered public health.
It should be noted that there is evidence that fluoride levels above 1.5 mg/L are known to increase health risks such as bone fractures, thyroid disease, and nervous system damage. But that concentration is over double of both what is optimal for preventing tooth decay and what the vast majority of water systems have, at 0.7 mg/L.
All of these uncertainties have given momentum for RFK Jr. and the Trump administration to crack down on water fluoridation. However, the decision about if a water system receives fluoride is up to state and local governments, as the federal government can only make recommendations. But the EPA can set and regulate the maximum level of fluoridation in water systems, which could provide an avenue for the Trump-appointed head of the agency, Lee Zeldin, to affect local policy.
Utah’s bill would be the most sweeping fluoride legislation to be passed if it’s signed; but it wouldn’t be the first place to ban fluoride. Lakeland, Florida, on March 3 unanimously voted to stop adding fluoride to its drinking water, and joins a growing list of over 170 American communities that have ended the practice since 2010.
Despite the long and safe history of fluoride’s use in drinking water, it seems that water fluoridation is having a similar moment to vaccinations. A new data point has emerged, casting doubt on the safety of the practice. But that new point is just one drop in an ocean of evidence supporting the usage of fluoride in water systems.
Engagement Resources
- The Food and Drug Administration provides extensive fact-checked information on a host of health and medical topics
- The American Dental Association has information regarding dental health and fluoride
- The National Institutes of Health focuses on understanding diet supplements
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

A World Without USAID: Deadly Impact
A World Without USAID: Deadly Impact
Foreign Policy #193 | By: Damian DeSola | February 28, 2025
Featured Photo by Kent Nishimura/Reuters
__________________________________
Trump’s closing down of USAID (and his pausing of foreign assistance) is having a devastating effect on humanity. Across the world, millions who once had access to lifesaving materials and funds are now in a state of panic and danger. Diseases including TB, HIV, and malaria are expected to skyrocket, and those who are already infected are no longer receiving the care they need. Hunger is sweeping across the globe as expected food deliveries do not arrive. Crisis zones are in dire shape, as the aid necessary for stabilizing them has vanished. But at least, Elon Musk is ‘saving’ us money, right?
One major slash to funding was to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). This program works to provide prenatal, postnatal, and sexual healthcare to women and girls across the world. It holds the goal of ending child marriage, female genital mutilation, preventable maternal death, and other gender-based violence, by 2030. The cuts to its funding make that goal and the daily functions of UNFPA impossible to carry out, leaving the women and girls of 150 nations without life-saving interventions.
In Africa, rates of disease that USAID’s funding fought are dramatically rising. For example, across South Africa, the USAID funded programs that provided HIV treatment have shutdown. South Africa has the world’s largest number of people living with HIV, around 8 million. One study estimates that the loss of one USAID-funded program, PEPFAR, will singly result in 601,000 HIV deaths and 565,000 new HIV infections in South Africa alone over ten years. Furthermore, UNAIDS, which also lost USAID funding, reports that if funding is not restored, a growth of 8.7 million HIV-infected persons and a tenfold increase of AIDS related deaths, 6.3 million, is expected.
Broadly, much of humanity is losing access to life saving food and nutritional care. With the freeze to foreign aid, 500,000 tons of food are now left rotting in storehouses as millions go hungry. In Sudan, the pause closed more than 1,100 communal kitchens, leaving nearly 2 million Sudanese struggling to survive. Furthermore, the Famine Early Warning System Network, which could use a variety of scientific and political data to detect potential famines, is now offline.
The State Department attempted to exempt emergency food aid and other lifesaving programs in a waiver. However, since no one understood what this exactly means, and the usual channels of USAID application cut off, the attempt for damage mitigation is fruitless. Perhaps the federal government should have considered the massive number of illness and death before freezing lifesaving aid.
What was covered above is a small piece of the massive damage that the dismantling of USAID and the pause on foreign aid has done to the world. This was not to mention the cholera, TB, and malaria outbreaks happening across the world that would have been prevented by USAID. Or the hospitals in Haiti that no longer have the support they need to give proper care to rape victims under the country’s gang rule. There is no doubt that these policies have been deadly and damaging to humanity.
Analysis
There are several explanations for Trump’s draconian foreign aid policies. The first, and most distasteful, is that the administration cares little about what happens to poor people in developing countries; or about America’s historical commitment, as the leader of the free world, to helping those countries remain stable.
Secondly it should be noted that the Trump/Musk team singled out USAID as the first agency they chose to cut because of the small base of resident support for foreign aid. The foreign assistance community is relatively small, compared to the support communities for fields like veterans’ affairs and education where we are likely to see greater citizen pushback. There is also existing support for reducing foreign aid, with around 51% of Americans prefer reductions in economic assistance and only 33% interested in keeping it the same.
The closing of USAID also is illegal. It is Congress, not the White House, that has the power to open and close federal agencies. In the case of the closure of USAID Congress was not consulted, nor have they voiced disapproval of Trump’s actions. The inaction of Congress in the face of this illegal action will lend confidence to the Trump administration for further actions that violate and stretch the law.
No one is pretending anymore. The current administration is demonstrating that caring about developing countries is considered weak and soft. However, we do see some hope. On March 5, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled to unfreeze the $2 billion in foreign aid that Donald Trump halted. While binding, Trump has promised to ignore Court orders, and this could be the start of a Constitutional crisis if Trump attempts to do so. However, if the government works as it is meant to, the released State Department funds can reach the people that need it. The order demands only that existing contracts must be fulfilled and does not approve any future funding, leaving little time for recipients to find new sources of funding support.
Engagement Resources
-
Fòs Feminista, an international organization dedicated to advancing women’s sexual and reproductive rights
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

Elon Musk’s Government Influence and Political Dynamics
Elon Musk’s Government Influence and Political Dynamics
Elections & Politics Policy #174 (Part Two of a Two-Part Series) | By: Inijah Quadri | February 28, 2025
Featured Photo by Andrew Leyden / ZUMA Press Wire
__________________________________
This is the second of two briefs examining Elon Musk’s extensive role in government and politics, including his actions under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and his close ties to the Trump administration. Recent reports indicate that Musk had used his personal wealth to finance President Donald Trump’s campaigns while also threatening to fund challengers against those who fail to support Trump’s platform. Critics question whether this practice makes politicians indebted to Musk, an arrangement some regard as an extreme extension of the Citizens United ruling on campaign contributions.
Musk’s access to citizen data through the Internal Revenue Service, the Treasury Department, and the Social Security Administration has generated further concerns. Although DOGE was formed to “make government more efficient,” federal officials have not disclosed why Musk should hold such extensive data or how he intends to manage it. Skeptics note that there appear to be no publicly available metrics defining the efficiency gains Musk frequently touts, making it difficult to assess whether his approach has improved government operations or simply bypassed existing processes.
A related consideration involves workforce reductions attributed to DOGE’s cost-cutting measures. Observers warn that job losses in key sectors—such as the National Park Service, the Education Department, and medical research—may undermine essential government services and initiatives. Coupled with Musk’s stated goal of “expanding human consciousness,” there is ongoing debate about how his philosophical ambitions align with the realities of federal governance and the broader public interest.
Analysis
Elon Musk’s political influence has drawn scrutiny from multiple angles. His generous financial support for Trump, including the prospect of backing opponents of politicians who do not align with the administration, raises questions about possible obligations owed to him. Media commentators argue that these arrangements highlight the ongoing debate around Citizens United, since large-scale private funding may confer disproportionate influence on policy decisions.
The Department of Government Efficiency, under Musk’s guidance, has reportedly acquired access to federal databases from agencies overseeing taxes, public records, and social benefits. While the stated rationale is increasing efficiency, details remain opaque. Officials within DOGE have not explained what benchmarks or methodologies govern progress. This leaves open the question of whether “efficiency” simply means budget cuts, automation, or other, more sweeping reorganizations that could bypass the usual legislative or regulatory checks.
Reports of layoffs within the federal workforce shed further light on DOGE’s activities. National Park rangers, scientific researchers, and employees in public health programs have voiced concerns about the capacity of their agencies to deliver essential services. Critics point to the ripple effects of these staffing changes, particularly in areas like environmental conservation and medical research, where reduced manpower may delay or derail key projects.
Musk’s concept of expanding human consciousness appears throughout his ventures, from space travel to artificial intelligence. He regularly promotes this vision to justify his unorthodox decisions. Yet the practical implications remain unclear when it comes to integrating spiritual or existential pursuits into large-scale federal policy. In this respect, Musk’s philosophical goals may blend uneasily with administrative realities.
Engagement Resources
-
“Elon Musk” by Walter Isaacson (https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Elon-Musk/Walter-Isaacson/9781982181284): A comprehensive biography that offers an in-depth look into Musk’s life, motivations, and the controversies surrounding his ventures.
-
“Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future” by Ashlee Vance (https://www.harpercollins.com/products/elon-musk-ashlee-vance?variant=40990196043874): This book provides insights into Musk’s entrepreneurial journey and his impact on technology and industry.
-
“Elon Musk’s 40 Greatest Motivational Speeches” (https://open.spotify.com/episode/2rv9HLfGO26fW5vhHazT5I): A compilation of speeches that showcase Musk’s perspectives on innovation, work ethic, and his vision for the future.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

Elon Musk: Innovation, Influence, and Ideological Evolution
Elon Musk: Innovation, Influence, and Ideological Evolution
Elections & Politics Policy #173 (Part One of a Two-Part Series) | By: Inijah Quadri | February 28, 2025
Featured Photo by REUTERS/Tingshu Wang
__________________________________
Elon Musk, born on June 28, 1971, in Pretoria, South Africa, has become a central figure in technology, business, and politics. As the founder and CEO of companies such as Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, Musk has significantly influenced sectors ranging from electric vehicles to space exploration and artificial intelligence. He grew up under the sometimes tumultuous influence of his father, Errol Musk, and has spoken about being bullied in his early years—experiences that may have shaped his resilience and occasionally combative public persona. Musk did not originally found Tesla but joined early, invested heavily, and eventually steered it to prominence, benefitting from large government contracts and subsidies along the way. In 2025, he assumed leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under President Donald Trump’s administration, aiming to streamline federal operations; however, some reports point to DOGE’s “unauthorized” or secret initiatives that blur lines between private enterprise and public governance.
Musk’s personal life, including multiple marriages and an estranged relationship with his trans daughter, has also garnered significant public scrutiny. These diverse facets raise critical questions about the interplay between private innovation, public policy, and ideological stance—particularly when an influential immigrant entrepreneur publicly takes anti-immigrant positions, associates with far-right political parties in Europe, and is occasionally accused of making gestures reminiscent of the Nazi salute. Taken together, Musk’s multifaceted roles and controversies underscore the need to examine how individual ambition, political alliances, and social values converge in shaping both industry and governance.
Analysis
Musk’s ventures are driven by an overarching mission to expand human consciousness and ensure the long-term survival of humanity. He has articulated a “driving philosophy” centered on “expanding the scope and scale of consciousness that we may better understand the nature of the universe.” This vision is evident in his ambitious projects, such as SpaceX’s Mars colonization program, which aims to make humanity a multiplanetary species to mitigate existential risks on Earth. Propelled by a relentless work ethic, Musk has overseen innovations in reusable rocket technology and the broad adoption of electric vehicles under Tesla. Yet, embedded in this bold approach is an intricate layer of government dependence: from subsidies granted to Tesla’s EV projects to lucrative federal contracts that feed SpaceX’s expansion, Musk’s success has, in part, been intertwined with public funds.
However, Musk’s methods and ideological shifts have sparked considerable controversy. His hands-on role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been criticized for potentially undermining traditional civil service structures. Numerous reports have highlighted DOGE’s significant autonomy—raising concerns about accountability, transparency, and the erosion of established governmental processes. Critics argue that while the drive for efficiency can be laudable, it should not eclipse democratic principles or bypass regulatory safeguards. These criticisms tie back to how Musk actually built Tesla into a major player—with both visionary zeal and a reliance on federal contracts that conflict, some say, with his more libertarian-leaning rhetoric.
Musk’s personal experiences have also profoundly influenced his public stance on social and political issues. The gender transition of his child, Vivian Wilson, reportedly contributed to his strong opposition to what he terms the “woke mind virus,” reflecting a shift toward conservative viewpoints. Likewise, Musk’s multiple marriages and publicized family disputes, including issues involving his trans daughter and her mother, underscore the complexity of a public figure who intertwines his personal life with his professional and political actions. Observers point out the paradox between Musk’s global ambitions and his occasional anti-immigrant statements despite being an immigrant himself. Meanwhile, his association with Donald Trump and high-profile political donations have raised questions about whether he uses his considerable wealth to curry favor with politicians.
Beyond Tesla and SpaceX, Musk’s involvement in xAI and his attempts to reacquire a controlling stake in OpenAI highlight his ambition to direct the trajectory of artificial intelligence. While he is hailed as a visionary driving innovation forward, concerns linger over the concentration of power and whether such dominance stifles competition. Even in the realm of space exploration, questions have been raised about the extent to which private interests should direct humanity’s efforts to colonize other planets—particularly when billions of dollars in government contracts contribute to these enterprises.
Understanding Elon Musk requires a nuanced examination of his ambitions, achievements, and controversies. Recent headlines note his purported backing of far-right political parties in Europe, alongside accusations in some media outlets of Musk gestures akin to the Nazi salute—claims Musk denies but which continue to surface in public discourse. Simultaneously, his recurrent calls for exploring space and perfecting artificial intelligence position him as a key figure in humanity’s technological evolution. As Musk’s reach spans from electric cars to Mars-bound rockets to AI governance, it becomes ever more important to probe how personal history, familial influence, political alliances, and substantial government support factor into his contentious role in shaping the future.
Engagement Resources
-
“Elon Musk” by Walter Isaacson (https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Elon-Musk/Walter-Isaacson/9781982181284): A comprehensive biography that offers an in-depth look into Musk’s life, motivations, and the controversies surrounding his ventures.
-
“Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future” by Ashlee Vance (https://www.harpercollins.com/products/elon-musk-ashlee-vance?variant=40990196043874): This book provides insights into Musk’s entrepreneurial journey and his impact on technology and industry.
-
“Elon Musk’s 40 Greatest Motivational Speeches” (https://open.spotify.com/episode/2rv9HLfGO26fW5vhHazT5I): A compilation of speeches that showcase Musk’s perspectives on innovation, work ethic, and his vision for the future.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

An Update on Trump’s Mass Deportation Efforts (Immigration Policy Brief #141)
An Update on Trump’s Mass Deportation Efforts
Immigration #141 | By: Morgan Davidson | March 6, 2025
Featured Photo: AP Photo/Matt Rourke
__________________________________
As we enter the second month of Donald Trump’s return to office, his stance on immigration remains as hardline as ever—if not more extreme. He has ramped up his rhetoric against so-called “criminals,” but communities across the country are feeling the tangible effects of his deportation policies. Friends, neighbors, workers, and community members are being forcibly removed, leaving behind fractured families and economic instability.
Beyond just rhetoric, Trump has resorted to extraordinary measures, including the deportation of detainees to former terrorist prison camps such as Guantánamo Bay. He claims that only the “worst of the worst” are being sent there—cartel members, rapists, and felons—but the reality is starkly different. The administration is struggling to find enough violent criminals to justify its heavy-handed approach because, contrary to Trump’s claims, millions of criminals are not flooding the border daily.
ICE operations have surged across the country, leading to the detention of more than just violent offenders. Due to pressure to meet quotas set by Trump, ICE agents have been rounding up non-violent individuals, including long-time residents with families and jobs in the U.S. Horror stories have begun to emerge, such as the tragic case of Jocelynn Rojo Carranza, an 11-year-old girl from Texas who took her own life after being bullied over her parents’ legal status and deportation. These stories underscore the human cost of Trump’s policies and highlight the broader impact of his administration’s targeting and persecution of immigrants.
Analysis
Since Trump took office, arrests of undocumented immigrants have surged dramatically. In late January alone, ICE arrested an average of 872 people per day—more than three times the 255 daily arrests under Joe Biden. However, deportations have not kept pace. The daily deportation rate stands at 600, which is lower than the 750 per day recorded last year under Biden.
According to Reuters, Trump deported 37,660 individuals in his first month—far below the monthly average of 57,000 seen during Biden’s final year. February’s arrest numbers also dropped sharply from 141,000 in February 2024, declining further from 29,000 in January. Meanwhile, over 3,000 detainees have been released back into the country, complicating the administration’s aggressive immigration strategy.
Under Biden, deportation efforts focused primarily on border crossers, with fewer interior arrests. Trump’s administration has shifted the focus, closing off much of the border and ramping up interior enforcement, leading to a sharp increase in ICE raids and detentions within U.S. communities. While more undocumented immigrants are being detained, deportations remain slow due to logistical bottlenecks and legal challenges.
With increased arrests, the detention system is nearing crisis levels. The number of detained immigrants has grown by more than 4,000 in just one month, pushing the total to nearly 44,000. Unlike under Biden—when many detainees were released under parole or bond—Trump’s ICE has significantly curtailed these releases. As a result, detention centers are overcrowded, and backlogs in processing cases continue to mount.
Although Trump initially pledged to prioritize violent criminals for deportation, the data tells a different story. The percentage of detainees with no criminal record has jumped from 6% to 16% since mid-January, suggesting that non-violent individuals are being disproportionately targeted. This raises serious concerns about the fairness and efficiency of the administration’s immigration enforcement policies.
Despite Trump’s vow to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, the numbers suggest this goal is unrealistic unless enforcement efforts escalate drastically. Republicans in Congress are calling for increased funding, and Trump is expanding military involvement in immigration enforcement, which could intensify removals in the coming months.
The individuals most affected by Trump’s policies include undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, and those previously protected under programs like Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The administration has targeted Haitians, Mexicans, and Panamanians, stripping away protections and rounding up individuals indiscriminately. Contrary to Trump’s initial claims, long-term residents are being arrested alongside recent arrivals, often without regard for their criminal history.
While arrests are soaring, deportations remain sluggish. Those who are deported can find themselves sent to countries like Panama, regardless of whether they are originally from there. Challenges with repatriation agreements and legal barriers have also led to cases where deportees are placed in dangerous conditions upon arrival.
Reports have surfaced of migrants being detained at Guantánamo Bay, sparking alarm over offshore processing and human rights concerns. The use of third-country detention centers—such as Panama—has led to international legal debates about the treatment of detainees and the ethics of outsourcing deportations.
While border crossings have declined, it remains unclear whether this is due to Trump’s immigration crackdown, Mexico’s National Guard deployments, or broader geopolitical shifts. Meanwhile, legal battles and grassroots resistance are growing, with communities mobilizing to protest the detainment and deportation of their neighbors, friends, and family members.
Politically, Trump’s approval ratings have taken a hit as his extreme immigration policies face mounting backlash. The economic and social repercussions of mass deportations are still unfolding, but they risk creating more instability than deterrence. The key question remains: is Trump’s crackdown a sustainable solution, or will it ultimately lead to greater challenges for the United States?
Engagement Resources
- National Public Radio (NPR) – analysis of whether a President can ignore court orders and rulings.
- Brennan Center for Justice – non – profit group’s analysis of the ignoring court orders debate.This brief was compiled by Rod Maggay. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief, please contact rodwood@email.com.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

American Dream
American Dream
Guest Op Ed By: Stephen Azarro | March 4, 2025
Featured Photo: istockphoto/rarrarorro
__________________________________
Our United States of America stands as a beacon of unity, prosperity and shared purpose in the pursuit of a better life. Here, diversity is accepted and celebrated as our greatest strength. Americans, regardless of background, work together to build a future where all can thrive, knowing that individual success is tied into the well-being of the entire community.
Education is the bedrock of our nation. From bustling city streets to quiet farmlands, every child and adult flourishes through access to world-class education. Every person has the right to make choices, pursue dreams, and shape their own destiny. We cultivate a culture of mentorship, innovation, and lifelong learning, ensuring that citizens of all ages can contribute meaningfully to society. Our communities, from the smallest towns to the largest cities are vibrant hubs of opportunity and ingenuity.
Our economy thrives for the many. Small businesses are nurtured, entrepreneurship is encouraged, and corporations operate with cutting-edge technology and a commitment to responsibility—toward workers, sustainable cities, clean energy, and environmental restoration. No one is left behind. Fair living wages, universal healthcare, and a strong social safety net make the American Dream attainable for all, ensuring a life of dignity, security, and purpose.
Technology serves as a tool for empowerment. Artificial intelligence and advanced infrastructure are revitalizing work making it more meaningful and rewarding. Our communities are strong, and our environment is in a state of sustainable renewal. Ingenuity, perseverance, and generosity guide us toward a future where comfort and security are realities for all.
In politics and human relationships, common ground prevails. Our shared values—love of country, respect for one another, and a collective drive for progress—shape our actions and conversations. Our leaders rise by inspiring hope and fostering respect. Dialogue and compromise are the cornerstone of our republic, strengthening the bonds that unite us.
Faith and culture coexist harmoniously. Whether in churches, synagogues, mosques, temples or community centers people come together to celebrate what unites them. There is no “us” and “them”—only “we.” Our diverse tapestry of cultures and beliefs weaves an inclusive society where every voice is heard, valued, and cherished.
In our America, every person has an equal opportunity to thrive in an inclusive society. Families are treasured, the elderly are honored, the young are empowered and those in need are supported. Compassion and strength walk hand in hand. Patriotism is defined by progress, empathy, and a deep commitment to the well-being of all.
This is our United States of America—a republic that upholds its highest ideals: OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE. We have learned from our past, thrive in the present, and move forward together as one nation, united in the radiant celebration of our shared dream. Through hard work, perseverance, determination, and dedication we continue to embody the promise of our national motto: “Out of Many, One.”
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.

Over a month of Trump: An explanation of new US Foreign Policy
Over a month of Trump: An explanation of new US Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy #192 | By: Ibrahim Castro | March 5, 2025
Featured Photo: President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House in Washington, D.C., Feb. 28, 2025. Brian Snyder/Reuters
__________________________________
It has been over a month now of the reelected Trump administration, in only a short time Donald Trump has managed to completely rewrite US foreign policy. Old allies are now possible enemies, old enemies are allies. There’s the possibility of the United States annexing and taking land by force, trade wars are on the rise and US soft power and global aid are now a thing of the past.
Shutting down USAID
Countries around the world are already feeling the impact of the Trump administration’s decision to eliminate more than 90% of foreign aid contracts and cut $60 billion in funding that provided humanitarian and development assistance to over 100 countries. President Trump has accused the agency of widespread waste and members of his administration have criticized the funding of programs that do not align with current US foreign policy goals.
Many of the programs are in fragile countries that are highly reliant on international aid to support health systems, nutrition programs and keep their populations from falling into famine. For example, In Ethiopia, food assistance has stopped for more than 1 million people, according to the Tigray Disaster Risk Management Commission. The Ministry of Health was also forced to terminate the contracts of 5,000 workers across the country focused on HIV and malaria prevention and vaccinations. In Bangladesh, 600,000 women and children will lose access to critical maternal health care, protection from violence, reproductive health services and other lifesaving care, according to the United Nations Population Fund.
The agency was set up by President John F. Kennedy in 1961 at the height of the Cold War. Its supporters say it helps save lives, strengthen civil society, assist the needy and promote and preserve democracy. It presented a gentler version of the US, as a global superpower that was willing to aid and help some of the world’s most vulnerable.
Warming ties with Russia and antagonizing Ukraine
Donald Trump made it clear from the outset of his reelection campaign that he would not assist Ukraine in the way the Biden administration had and would seek a peace deal with Russia. Just that has come to pass, with few surprised and many scrambling because of the manner in which Trump has been pursuing his stated goal of ending the Ukraine war. The now infamous clash between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Donald Trump plunged ties between Kyiv and Washington to a new low. Ukraine had received strong support from the previous administration including funding, weapons and a promise of a pathway to NATO membership. All of which are now no longer in the cards for Ukraine with the Trump administration.
The Trump administration has pushed for a minerals deal with Ukraine, citing the billions given to the country to fight against Russian forces over the course of the war as the reason. The proposed deal would give the US wide access to rare earth minerals in Ukraine as repayment. The US, since the change of administrations, has twice sided with Russia in votes at the United Nations to mark the third anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. First joining Russia in voting against a Europe-backed Ukrainian support resolution. Then abstaining from voting on the US’ own resolution after Europeans amended it to be more critical of Moscow. Trump has called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a “dictator,” falsely accused Kyiv of starting the war and warned that Zelensky “better move fast” to negotiate an end to the conflict or risk not having a nation anymore.
Trump’s plan to take over Gaza
Since returning to office, the new US president has made several alarming threats regarding the annexation of foreign territories. In his inaugural address, he even declared that the United States would expand its borders during his second term. One of his more hostile proposals involves ethnically cleansing (moving) 2.1 million Palestinians out or Gaza and transforming the strip into a “Riviera” to be owned by the United States. This plan has met with support from Far-Right Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who constantly threatens to resume the war in Gaza at any moment.
In response to Trump’s plan to “own” Gaza, Arab leaders gathered last month in Riyadh to devise a collective plan. Neighboring countries are deeply concerned about the potential ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, who would not be allowed to return and are expected to be absorbed into the populations of surrounding nations. The leaders are set to meet again in Cairo this March to finalize their strategy, which they will likely present to Trump. Additionally Israel has been expanding its hold over territory in Syria after the fall of the Assad regime and has ramped up activity in the West Bank in preparation for annexation. Trump refused to guarantee that Israel would not annex the occupied West Bank.
Trump and Latin America
In his first term Trump created a less than favorable relationship with many of the US’ Latin American neighbors, and this time around appears to be no different. Trump devoted a significant part of his inaugural address to demanding that Panama return control of the Panama Canal to the US, threatening to take it by force if it wasn’t handed over. Less than a week into his presidency, he threatened tariffs and visa restrictions on Colombia, a longtime close US ally, after the country’s president, Gustavo Petro, blocked military aircraft from returning migrants deported from the United States. Later Trump’s “envoy for special missions” Richard Grenell traveled to Venezuela. There he met with the country’s autocratic president, Nicolás Maduro, who is not even recognized as the country’s legitimate leader by the US government, and reached an agreement for the country to accept Venezuelan deportees. Donald Trump has also continued antagonizing Mexico with actions such as renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, threatening and imposing tariffs and beginning military activity such as flying reaper drones within Mexican territory.
Trump visas
Trump unveiled a new pathway to citizenship, a “gold card” aimed at wealthy foreigners who are willing to pay millions for the right to live in the US. The new program comes as the Trump administration moves to change the country’s rules for who can legally live, work and gain citizenship in the US. The administration’s plans include tightening restrictions on many types of immigration in the US and pushing to end birthright citizenship, the constitutionally protected right to citizenship for anyone born on US soil. When asked by reporters if Russian oligarchs could qualify for the visa, Trump responded, “Possibly… Hey, I know some Russian oligarchs that are very nice people. It’s possible. They’re not as wealthy as they used to be. I think they could afford $5 million”.
Tariffs
New 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada have taken effect after being implemented by the Trump administration. The move could upend nearly $2.2 trillion in annual trade between the countries.Trump declared that the tariffs were necessary because the US’ top trading partners had failed to do enough to stem the flow of fentanyl and its precursor chemicals into the US. Both Mexico and Canada have announced retaliatory tariffs on the United States. Trudeau warned that a trade war would be costly for both countries. Trump has announced he would move ahead on April 2nd with plans for reciprocal tariffs on any countries around the world that he sees as treating the US unfairly.
Conclusion
These actions reflect Trump’s overarching foreign policy goal of prioritizing American interests, often at the expense of traditional alliances and multilateral cooperation. Trump has been very active on the global stage but is making enemies out of old allies and causing rifts that may change those allyships and friendly relations forever. The US’ image, influence and credibility on the world stage has been greatly altered again for a second time and it is unlikely that it will ever recover. Trump has sped up the clock on a non-US dominated world as more countries become wary of working with the United States under Donald Trump.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.