CIVIL RIGHTS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES
Latest Civil Rights Posts
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. Trump and Mail Ballots (Part 1) (Civil Rights Policy Brief #256)
Policy Summary: On March 31, 2026 President Donald Trump issued the executive order (EO) titled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections.” The order had two main components – the establishment of state citizenship lists of every citizen in the state eligible to vote and directing the United States Postal Service with creating and implementing rules regarding the use, delivery and acceptance of mail – ballots used by each individual State.
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Trump v. Barbara (Civil Rights Policy Brief #255)
On President Donald Trump’s first day in office of his second term, he signed Executive Order (EO) 14160. The EO is called Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship. The Order was intended to overturn the constitutional rule that recognizes birthright citizenship.
United States Supreme Court Upholds Mail Ballot Receipt Grace Periods (Civil Rights Policy Brief #254)
Civil Rights Policy Brief #254 | July 5, 2026 | Rodney A. Maggay Policy Summary: In 2024 prior to the United States elections the Republican National Committee and the Trump Campaign filed numerous legal challenges that sought to invalidate mail voting ballot receipt...
A Preview of Supreme Court June Cases (Civil Rights Policy Brief #253)
President Donald Trump may have gotten what he most wanted from the U.S. Supreme Court when it ruled on July 1, 2024 – by a 6-3 vote – that former presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution by, essentially, being president. Trump named three justices to the high court during his first term in office – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett – and all three ruled in his favor in Trump v. United States (Barrett in part). The latest raft of major SCOTUS rulings, due next month, may continue to largely meet with Trump’s approval, or at least conservative priorities, but by no means is the court’s October 2025 term, as it’s officially known, likely to be a slam dunk for the right.
Why Louisiana v. Callais Is Problematic For The Voting Rights Act (Civil Rights Policy Brief #252)
After the 2020 United States Decennial Census Louisiana was allocated six congressional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Accordingly the Louisiana State Legislature drew its state congressional map that had five districts with white majorities and one with a black majority.
The Problem With DOJ Requesting Voter Roll Information From States (Civil Rights Policy Brief #251)
Starting in May 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) proceeded to request from nearly every state and the District of Columbia (D.C.) access to each state’s un – redacted and complete voter rolls. Each state’s voter rolls contain the list of every registered voter in the state.
President Trump’s Odd Proposal to “Nationalize” U.S. Elections (Civil Rights Policy Brief #250)
On February 2, 2026 President Donald Trump stated in a podcast interview that Republicans in a number of states should take over elections in their states in order to protect the political party. He then added that elections in the United States should be “nationalized” and run by the Federal Government rather than the current setup where elections are run by individual states.
An Analysis of the California – Texas Re-Districting Fight (Civil Rights Brief #249)
After the State of Texas’ approval of a re – drawn state congressional map that would be used in 2026 to give them five more likely Republican districts, the State of California decided to respond.
Can The Government Prosecute Protesters For Their Speech? (Civil Rights Policy Brief #248)
During a small outing by President Trump and a small group of officials at a public restaurant in Washington, D.C., the President was met by a small group of protesters. The protesters chanted “Free DC” and “Free Palestine” and also “Trump is the Hitler of our time!” The protesters were ultimately removed. However, the President later suggested the protesters should be charged under a racketeering statute since he said one of the protesters was a “paid agitator.” It is unclear where the President receivedthis bit of info or if it is even true. After this incident, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche gave an interview where he defended the idea of prosecuting protesters.
