JOBS

JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES

The Jobs and Infrastructure domain tracks and reports on policies that deal with job creation and employment, unemployment insurance and job retraining, and policies that support investments in infrastructure. This domain tracks policies emanating from the White House, the US Congress, the US Department of Labor, the US Department of Transportation, and state policies that respond to policies at the Federal level. Our Principal Analyst is Vaibhav Kumar who can be reached at vaibhav@usresistnews.org.

Latest Jobs Posts

 

Teen Pornographers and Trump’s Black Friends: Can Deepfakes Be Controlled?

Brief #109 – Technology Policy Brief
by : Mindy Spatt

Regulators worldwide are grappling with the proliferation of AI-generated deepfakes, which pose significant threats ranging from election manipulation to the spread of explicit content targeting minors. While some legislative efforts have been initiated, concerns persist over the effectiveness of voluntary regulations and the need for comprehensive legal measures to address the emotional and reputational harm caused by deepfakes.

read more

El Salvador’s President Addresses His Country’s Gang Problem

Brief #129 – Foreign Policy Brief
by: Abigail Hunt

El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele tackles the nation’s gang crisis with a prolonged anti-gang emergency decree, which has significantly reduced murders. However, concerns arise over human rights violations and discriminatory policies targeting indigenous communities, raising questions about the president’s approach and ambitions beyond El Salvador’s borders.

read more

The Tragedy in Haiti

Brief #128 – Foreign Policy Brief
by: Abigail Hunt

Escalating gang violence and political chaos grip Haiti as over 3,500 inmates escape prison, with gangs now controlling most of Port-au-Prince. The U.S. has announced plans to deploy troops to stabilize the situation, amid Haiti’s tumultuous history of colonialism and ongoing socioeconomic struggles.

read more

Should Trump Be Given Classified Foreign Intelligence Briefings As A Candidate?

Brief #221 – Civil Rights Policy Brief
by Rodney A. Maggay

Amidst former President Trump’s legal battles over mishandling classified documents, questions arise over his eligibility to receive classified foreign intelligence briefings as a 2024 election candidate. With bipartisan concerns and differing expert opinions, debates ensue regarding the potential national security implications of such briefings.

read more

Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Ruling in Trump Ballot Case

Brief #220 – Civil Rights Policy Brief
by Rodney A. Maggay

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the Trump ballot case, affirming that states cannot remove Donald Trump from the ballot for the 2024 presidential election, despite allegations of inciting the January 6th insurrection. The Court highlighted the requirement for congressional legislation to apply Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, raising queries about presidential eligibility clauses.

read more
Jobs01 e1489352304814
A Hard Road for a Young Palestinian Mother

A Hard Road for a Young Palestinian Mother

A Hard Road for a Young Palestinian Mother

Foreign Policy Brief #118 | By: Aziza Taslaq | February 02, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.stopthewall.org

__________________________________

In the heart of Bethlehem, where echoes of history resonate through the cobblestone streets, lived Salma, a 33-year-old mother devoted to her young daughter, Sara. Salma’s life, once painted with the hues of contentment, took a dark turn on April 17th, 2023 – a date etched in her family’s memory as Prisoner’s Day.

Salma, a proficient sales representative, found fulfillment working remotely for an Israeli company. Her warmth endeared her to colleagues, and she reveled in meeting monthly targets. However, enticed by a promising opportunity with a local Palestinian company, she decided to embrace the prospect of contributing to her homeland.

On that fateful day, as Salma navigated the Gosh Atsion checkpoint between Bethlehem and Hebron, tragedy struck. Israeli soldiers, without warning, fired upon her, leading to her immediate arrest. The news reached her father, Ismael, who, unaware of the severity of her injuries, grappled with the shocking revelation.

Ismael, in anguish, shared the grim truth – Salma had been shot in the belly, the bullet piercing her backbone, rendering her paralyzed. Held in Shaary Tsedek hospital, she underwent a surgery stripping her of a kidney and enduring a 50% liver resection. The subsequent transfer to Al-Ramlah prison, known for housing critical medical cases, intensified the nightmare.

Incarcerated for a month, Salma faced a series of charges, including the absurd allegations of possessing a knife and attempting stabbing. Ismael, along with Salma’s mother and young daughter, was denied the basic right to visit or communicate with her during this harrowing period.

Sara, blissfully unaware of her mother’s plight, believed her to be in the hospital, grappling with an illness. Little did she know about the grim reality that had befallen her mother.

Salma’s time in prison was marked by indignity, a lack of privacy, and a struggle against her newfound disability. Her father, haunted by fear, spoke of the challenges his favorite daughter now faced – a life confined to a wheelchair, dependent on others for even the simplest daily tasks.

The Occupation Court’s relentless pursuit of charges only deepened the wounds, casting a shadow over Salma’s already fraught existence. The emotional turmoil inflicted upon her family, unable to provide comfort or support, added to the tragedy.

However, amidst the darkness emerged a glimmer of hope. The Prisoner Exchange Deal between Hamas and Israel, sealed on October 7th, 2023, brought a twist in Salma’s fate. Her name, a part of the negotiated exchange, led to her liberation on November 24th, 2023.

Salma’s release, while a moment of triumph, underscored the fragility of life in a conflict-ridden region. The tale of this Palestinian mother, her resilience, and the silent suffering of countless others echo the broader narrative of a people caught in the crossfire of geopolitical struggles.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Trump and the E. Jean Carroll Case

Trump and the E. Jean Carroll Case

Trump and the E. Jean Carroll Case

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #121 | By: Arvind Salem | February 01, 2024
Photo taken from: www.nbcnews.com
__________________________________

On January 26, 2024, a New York jury ruled that Trump was responsible for paying journalist Elizabeth Jean Carroll (usually referred to as E. Jean Carroll) $83.3 million in damages: a huge legal setback for Trump as he faces a total 91 state and federal charges.

This case is an extension of a previous case centered around allegations that in 1996 Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in New York City. Trump entirely dismissed the accusations and attacked Carroll’s character, which she alleges caused her damages to her career and constituted defamation. The jury ruled that Trump didn’t rape Carroll, but he was liable for sexual assault and awarded her $5 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages for the defamation.

This new case centers around further comments Trump made post-presidency and continued damage that those comments have inflicted on E. Jean Carroll. Given that this is the second time this issue has been litigated, and Trump was found to be responsible, Trump was given much harsher punitive damages: out of the $83.3 million in total payment, $18.3 million was for compensatory damages, the largest part being $11 million for damages to her reputation, and $65 million in punitive damages, which she claimed she needed to stop Trump from continuing to defame her. Trump has already stated that he would appeal both decisions: meaning that Carroll will not see the nearly $90 million total for a long time, until all appeals are exhausted.

Policy Analysis:

This case was allowed to proceed despite the statute of limitations already expiring, due to a New York state law passed in 2022 called The Adult Survivors Act that gave all sexual abuse victims a year to file civil lawsuits, even if the statute of limitations had run out. Under this law, Carroll sued Trump. However, since this law only allows for civil suits, Carroll could only sue for the defamation  a civil violation) and not the assault ( a criminal offense). Additionally, this case was previously blocked by the Trump justice department, with Bill Barr, the attorney general, arguing that Trump made his statements as part of his official capacity as president. In 2023, the Biden Justice Department lifted the restriction and allowed the case to move forward.

This trial took the verdict of the other trial as fact, so this case was predicated on the fact that Trump did assault Carroll, and the only question was the extent of the damages especially regarding Trump’s later statements. This trial also tested Trump’s courtroom presence, which will likely be important in his later, higher-stakes trials. In this regard, Trump did not make a good impression on the judge, by audibly commenting during Carroll’s testimony such that opposing counsel and the jury could hear, which resulted in him getting admonished. He also, in one last act of defiance, stormed out during closing arguments, leaving his lawyer alone to deliver the argument.

Engagement Resources:

  • Joe Biden for President: Readers who have reservations about voting for Trump in 2024 because of this case should explore this website to see if Joe Biden is an alternative that they would support.
  • DCCC: Readers who are inclined to support the Democratic party after hearing about this case may wish to explore this site to donate to Democratic Congressional Campaigns in 2024.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Is Russia’s president Putin afraid of Alexei Navalny? (Part 2)

Is Russia’s president Putin afraid of Alexei Navalny? (Part 2)

Is Russia’s president Putin afraid of Alexei Navalny? (Part 2)

Foreign Policy Brief #117 | By: Yelena Korshunov | January 31, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.ctvnews.ca

“I will give up neither my ideas nor my homeland.”

__________________________________

Alexei Navalny, a leading opponent to Russia’s president, wrote a post three years after his return to Russia from Germany, where he was treated after being supposedly poisoned by the Russian government. Navalny says that he is regularly asked why he returned to Russia. He writes that the other prisoners ask this question “simply and directly,” while the prison administration asks “carefully, with the recorders turned off.” The imprisoned politician notes that the majority of them “do not believe simple motives” and assume that he had “some kind of cunning plan in which the Kremlin towers are involved.”

In his post Alexei Navalny states that “it happens that now in Russia I have to pay by sitting in solitary confinement for my right to have and to not hide my convictions. And I certainly don’t like sitting. But I will give up neither my ideas nor my homeland. My beliefs are not exotic, or sectarian, or radical. On the contrary, everything I believe in is based on science and historical experience. People in power must change. The best way to elect power is fair and free elections. Everyone needs a fair trial. Corruption destroys the state. There should be no censorship. The future lies with these principles.”

On December 6, 2023, connection with the politician was lost. After 19 days, Alexei Navalny was found above the Arctic Circle in correctional colony # 3 “Polar Wolf” in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region. The lack of communication and any information about the prisoner at the transfer to another correctional facility is the norm for the Russian prison system. The destination during the transfer is kept secret not only from lawyers and relatives, but from the convicted person himself. A person might even learn about the situation of being sent to another colony just a couple of hours before departure.

For a prisoner it means a constant state of uncertainty and terrible transportation conditions. Prisoners, as a rule, are transported by rail in so-called “stolypin cars” [named after a 19th century Russia’s minister Stolypin in whose period these wagons were widely implemented]. This is a special carriage that accommodates up to 12 people in one ordinary compartment designed for 4 persons. These carriages have no windows, a prisoner can only go to the bathroom under escort, and hot meals are not provided during the entire time of transit.

The “Polar Wolf” colony where Russia’s president Vladimir Putin transferred his opponent has a very bad reputation. It always functioned as a colony for especially dangerous recidivists, but during Putin’s regime it became a placement for his political opponents and disgraced oligarchs such as Platon Lebedev, a business partner of Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s [Russian public and political figure, entrepreneur, publicist, and former oligarch, residing in Europe after his release from Russia’s prison]. This colony is known as one of the most northern, remote, and having harsh conditions.

Russia’s opposing mass media outlet Meduza (now located in Latvia) cites a lawyer who specializes in protecting the rights of convicts. “This is a disgusting colony,” he says. “The conditions for serving a sentence are very difficult, any requests from there are blocked, except, perhaps, for some medical necessities and financial assistance. Navalny will be able to keep in touch with the world only through lawyers.”

The colony is located in the tundra, in an arctic climate. “The conditions there are extremely difficult, since the special regime is actually legalized torture in and of itself,” the lawyer continues. “Last year the prosecutor of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Region identified violations at “Polar Wolf” in the field of labor protection, fire safety, and sanitary standards. That means that everything is so bad with the conditions in the colony that even the prosecutor’s office considered it necessary to intervene, although, as a rule, prosecutorial supervision over places of deprivation of liberty is of a very formal nature.”

This colony has always been famous for the fact that prisoners were sent there for “breaking”. Those who are sitting there today are mostly political prisoners, who “are ready to do anything for a pack of cigarettes, because of the difficulty to serve a sentence there,” – says a representative of a prisoners’ rights foundation Sitting Rus’ [Rus’ is an old name of Russia].

Maximum security colonies such as “Polar Wolf” house recidivists, serial killers, and those who have had their death sentence switched to life imprisonment. However, Russia’s current president stuffs them with his political opponents. To date, Alexei Navalny has been sentenced to 19 years in prison. Most likely, in this colony, he will be completely isolated from the outside world, forgoing any of his previous influence on Russian voters’ minds.

Engagement Resources:

Read the first part of the Alexei Navalny series here. Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Does Nikki Haley Have a Shot?

Does Nikki Haley Have a Shot?

Does Nikki Haley Have a Shot?

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #120 | By: Arvind Salem | January 31, 2024
Photo taken from: www.19thnews.org
__________________________________

With Ron DeSantis dropping out right before the New Hampshire primary, it left the rest of the Republican primary as a two candidate race between Nikki Haley and Trump. Haley, not initially projected to be the last person standing against Trump, polling only 2% at the start of the race, has nevertheless weathered the withering of the field from a wide-eyed group of 13 presidential hopefuls to the battle-tested final two. Yet the one constant throughout this whole turbulent sage is that Donald Trump is still projected to win.

In the official primary election so far, there is only a sample size of two states: Iowa and New Hampshire. As the first states up, they have an outsized influence for the nominee: a good performance allowing them to gain momentum to bolster their candidacy, while a disappointing one can strike a death blow to a campaign.

Unfortunately for Haley she did not win either New Hampshire or Iowa, placing third in Iowa, after DeSantis and Trump, and second in New Hampshire. The winners of the New Hampshire Primary in the last four competitive election cycles have gone on to win the nomination and no Republican in the modern primary era has failed to win the nomination after winning both Iowa and New Hampshire. Trump beat Haley by 11 points in New Hampshire and 30 points in Iowa.

New Hampshire was expected to be closer as the voters there are typically more moderate, which is a key group that forms Haley’s appeal, yet she was unable to pull out the victory. Despite these setbacks, Haley has vowed to stay in the race, at least until her home state of South Carolina, where she was formerly governor.

 Analysis:

The path to victory for Haley is hard to imagine, but examining her current strategy can still provide insight into potential flaws in Trump’s armor that the Democratic candidate, most likely Biden, can use against him. The longer Haley can draw out this fight, the more weaknesses she exposes to Trump, and takes away time that he could’ve used to focus on the general. However, if she loses in South Carolina, her path to victory would essentially be shut.

The reason it is so hard for Haley to win and beat Trump is that she, and every other Republican challenger to Trump, had to do two things: they needed to be different enough to merit running, yet similar enough to gain support in Republican strongholds, which is even more important in a primary of solely Republican voters. Challengers like Ramaswamy and DeSantis essentially marketed themselves as similar to Trump on policy, but were willing to go more extreme (Ramaswamy) or were more effective in accomplishing the agenda (DeSantis). However, Haley is presenting herself as an alternative to Trump not only in these terms, but also in terms of actual policy priorities.

These differences between Haley and Trump and their electoral implications are best manifested in foreign policy: Trump represents a new era of Republicans, disillusioned after conflicts in the Middle East, that advocates for more isolationism and less U.S. activity, which can be seen in his reluctance to give aid to Ukraine. However, Haley is more of a traditional conservative war hawk, who emphasizes the need for the United States to be strong on the global stage and promote U.S. leadership abroad. This philosophy is more typical of the conservatives of the past, but also what led the U.S. into largely unpopular wars in the Middle East, prompting the Republicans to turn away from that ideology.

This essentially shows Haley’s unique approach to answering the contradiction posed: her strategy seems to be representing a return to a pre-Trump Republican party and bet on the fact that there is a broad, deep-seeded desire in the Republican base to return to that era rather than continue on the path of Trumpism. This approach has also allowed her to bolster her conservative credentials amid doubts of her true commitment to the conservative cause: she can highlight her support of classical conservative policies as South Carolina’s Governor, like voter ID and pension reform, while painting Trump as the conservative neophyte who is departing from their core conservative principles. Despite this attempt voters still view her as a moderate, with her losing significantly to Trump among registered Republicans, but making some of that up with the moderate vote. Exemplifying this, an NBC News/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll of Iowa just prior to the GOP caucuses reported that 43% of Haley’s supporters said they would vote for President Joe Biden over Trump this fall.

Haley is also moving to attack Trump in terms of his mental competency, framing him just like Republicans have attempted to frame Biden: a relic of a previous era who is unfit to be president in the current day. Haley has manifested this in policy by calling for a mental competency test for anyone who would be president over the age of 75, which includes Trump, and attempting to goad him into debating her, where she would presumably try to prove this point on the debate stage.

In practical terms, the Haley campaign has stated that they believe there is still a path to victory, since more states mirror New Hampshire’s ideology than Iowa’s, and the New Hampshire contest was significantly closer than the Iowa one, although Trump still won by double-digits. Yet, that theory will be put to the test in South Carolina: if she can’t win the state where she theoretically has the most name recognition and proven track record, it will not only be tough to win, but tough to even convince donors and the public that she has a viable shot. Trump has already secured key endorsements in South Carolina to combat Haley’s theoretical advantage: Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster, the state’s lieutenant governor, attorney general, treasurer and House speaker and statewide officials, along with U.S. Reps. Joe Wilson, William Timmons, Russell Fry and Senator Tim Scott.

Engagement Resources:
  • Joe Biden for President: Those who are not convinced by either Haley or Trump should consider exploring this campaign.
  • Nikki Haley for President: Those who are intrigued by Nikki Haley as a possible Trump alternative for conservatives should consider exploring this campaign.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Carefree Use of Groundwater Is Making Us Thirsty

Carefree Use of Groundwater Is Making Us Thirsty

Carefree Use of Groundwater Is Making Us Thirsty

Environment Policy Brief #164 | By: Todd J. Broadman | January 30, 2024
Photo taken from: www.popularmechanics.com

__________________________________

Summary

There is a depletion of groundwater in the U.S. Much of the reason has to do with industrial scale agriculture used to grow crops that feed animals. A primary culprit is alfalfa. Alfalfa is a legume and is preferred by beef cattle producers because beef cattle raised on alfalfa hay get bigger faster, and dairy cows fed alfalfa produce more milk. Alfalfa contains more than 1,800 pounds of protein per acre on an annual basis and as a result is the top cash crop in many states. Farmers can’t get enough of this “high quality forage.” That high protein content requires copious amounts of water to grow; alfalfa ranks as one of the most water-intensive crops, requiring about 1,630,000 gallons of water per acre. On average, that’s equivalent to annual water use for 10 residential homes. Over 6 million acres of American farmland is dedicated to growing water-hungry alfalfa.

Furthermore, there is a direct line connection between alfalfa, dairy cows, and the American diet. In addition to demand for beef, increasingly, chicken is preferred – and the consumer demand for cheese has skyrocketed as well. Cheese consumption has nearly doubled over the last few decades, driven by the popularity of cheese covered pizza. In 2023, the average consumer tipped the scales, consuming over 100 pounds of chicken, a doubling in proportions, similar to the increase in cheese consumption. (The Eat-Lancet Commission recommends the optimal diet ought to be closer to one quarter of those amounts).

According to Brian Richter, president of Sustainable Waters, crops grown for cattle feed are the “greatest consumer of river water in the western United States.” One telling statistic is that 55 percent of water in the Colorado River Basin is used to grow feed crops including alfalfa, grass hay, and corn. Meanwhile, almost 80 percent of monitoring wells hit record lows in the past decade.

This is why in states like Nevada, alfalfa is the state’s top cash crop, while in Arkansas it is soybeans – to feed the billion or so chickens in that region of the country. As with alfalfa, the soy crop too, is largely dependent upon water from depleted aquifers. The amount of irrigated acreage dedicated to soybean production, mostly used for animals, has seen an 800 percent increase over the last 5 decades. And then there is the water required for corn, about half of which also goes toward animal feed, whose acreage has gone up 600 percent over the same period.

Arizona is typical of many western states in that there are no legal limits to use of groundwater, a finite resource. This availability of groundwater has led foreign investors (Saudi Arabia figures prominently in Arizona) to purchase land in unregulated states and grow crops like alfalfa in an otherwise arid desert – and then ship the crop home to feed cattle. For these reasons, in the absence of federal regulations on aquifer use, states are now creating rules where little or no regulation existed. There are more calls to decrease alfalfa production in western states that depend on the Colorado River. This is an uphill battle though, as is the case in traditional farming cultures, the value of freedom to: choose crops planted based on economics as well as respond to consumer demand.

Analysis

In the face of the looming water shortage, we have a western farming culture that focuses on the immediate short-term economics and  freedom of choice for the American consumer. California farmer Ronnie Leimgruber reflects that culture when he states that “the reason I grow alfalfa is because it’s the most profitable crop that I can grow, because that’s what people want to buy.” Environmental concerns are not on his radar. “If they wanted to buy more lettuce or more onions or more tomatoes,” he poses, “I would grow up for them — if it was more profit. But currently, people like eating pizzas. They like eating beef. They like eating Happy Meals at McDonald’s. They like eating cheese quesadillas. And I produce the feedstock that feeds the cattle that makes all those products.”

The environmental reality though, is that each pound of cheese produced requires, on average, 10 pounds of milk. And the cows producing that milk need to eat high-protein foods that require vast quantities of water, like alfalfa.

Farmers grow alfalfa because it is very profitable – selling for a high of $320 per ton in 2022, up from $210 the year before, making it more lucrative than other large-scale crops like wheat. With sufficient water, alfalfa can be harvested up to 10 times a year. It provides nutritious and healthy feed for cattle and dairy cows, which means there’s significant demand for it both in the United States and overseas in regions such as the Middle East and Asia.

Fortunately, there are those, like Brian E. Olmstead, who serves on Idaho’s Water Resource Board and issues a cautionary message: “Everybody thought, this was such a huge resource, we can’t ever deplete it.” Major global dairy food producers like Glanbia of Ireland, Lactalis of France and Agropur of Canada all operate large processing plants in western states. Glanbia alone has four plants in Idaho, which use 4.3 billion pounds of milk a year. They are aware of the significant toll their production exacts on water resources. Exports of alfalfa and other hay types also play a significant role in water usage; almost 20% of alfalfa was exported in 2021, and most of that to China. They are paying top dollar to U.S. producers to support their growing domestic dairy industry.

Speaking out on behalf of our aquifers are people like Gerald McKenna, on the board of the Desert Water Agency in Palm Springs, California. He states bluntly that, “We can do one simple thing and our water supply crisis will be over. We can stop growing alfalfa.” His declaration is sensible, “It seems to me to be just crazy to be growing that water-thirsty product in one of the driest places in the country. And yet that’s what we do.” Like McKenna, Aaron Smith, an agricultural economist at UC-Davis, also speaks for the environment over industry pressures: “From a pure resources perspective, it’s inefficient to grow plants, then feed those to animals and have animals use that energy and then we eat that energy. It would be more efficient to directly eat plants but the problem is, they don’t taste as good.”

When it comes to groundwater depletion, short-term economics and corporate profits are ushered along without much caution or environmental guardrails. In that respect, U.S. aquifers are viewed much like carbon reserves – there for the taking. The hard tradeoffs and sacrifices are right around the corner. That’s when corporate profits dry up along with flow of water.

Engagement Resources:
  • https://foodprint.org is dedicated to research and education on food production practices. Their aim is to pull back the curtain on the impacts of industrial food production practices.
  • https://grist.org  is dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Their goal is to use the power of storytelling to illuminate the way toward a better world.
  • https://www.alfalfa.org is an umbrella organization of state and regional alfalfa seed and alfalfa hay associations, genetic suppliers, seed marketers, and allied industry members dedicated to promoting the interests of the nation’s alfalfa.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today. Your support matters – we depend on readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism!

Journalism Rights Should Matter Like Other Human Rights

Journalism Rights Should Matter Like Other Human Rights

Journalism Rights Should Matter Like Other Human Rights

Social Justice Policy Brief #154 | By: Diing Magot | January 30, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.cl.usembassy.gov

__________________________________

The author is a new U.S. RESIST NEWS Reporter who comes from South Sudan (South Sudanese) , has spent time covering stories in South Sudan and Kenya, and now resides in the US. This Brief in part is a reflection of her time spent in covering news in all 3 countries.

Summary

Journalism is currently under threat, in today’s world people are still confused about the role of a journalist in a democratic society. Professional journalists at present face threats while doing their job of uncovering the truth. Access to information is a challenge and journalists continuously work in an environment that can lead to being harassed threatened, jailed or even killed. According to a report by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), last year more than 300 journalists around the world have been imprisoned because of their work.

CPJ also reports that in 66 cases, those held have not yet been told of the charges they are facing. They often face gratuitously cruel conditions, due process is frequently subverted as authorities prolong pre-charge and pre-trial detention of journalists, and journalists’ lawyers themselves face retaliation around the world.

Analysis

A journalist is someone whose career includes research that leads to investigating, searching for contacts, interviewing sources and producing all the facts, and then reporting it as news through a medium such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television and the internet.

In Kenya, Article 33 protects and entrenches the Freedom of Expression in all its manifestations, including the freedom to seek, receive or impart information or ideas, including artistic creativity, academic and scientific research, but with limited exceptions to propaganda for war, incitement to violence; hate speech or advocacy of hatred.

When I was growing up, I always wanted to be a part of the change in society. I started my journalism career as a print news intern at Kenya News Agency in Nairobi, Kenya. Working in the media is interesting because you get to work with experienced journalists, writers, and editors.

I also interned at Royal Media Services , Citizen Television. This organization was  a bigger media house. It had a television station, digital media and a radio station that has local dialects from Kenya. When I was an intern at Citizen TV ,  I was star struck when I met the news anchors that were on television. I loved working in the media it made me learn something new every day about people. As a journalist you need to have tough skin when you are in the media otherwise you will not survive. Everyone is very ruthless and wants to be on top. When you write a lot of negative news such as rape, murder, lynching, corruption, protests, it can make you lose trust in people.

But when you see your byline it is very satisfying to see your story published. When I was in South Sudan the media field was different. Article 24 of the Interim Constitution of South Sudan 2011 talks of freedom of expression but with a limit. I was a member of a journalists group there,  and we were usually amongst the first people to know when a story broke. However,  sometimes the editor needed to decide whether the story was newsworthy before it was published. If the story incited violence or hate speech, or had the possibility of bringing defamation charges,  it was killed.

You are always learning something new because everybody has a different life experience and stories. You will do a lot of research to have an idea of what you are about to write. If you are the editor, you are the agenda setter , you get to decide which stories will make the headlines and get people talking. As a  journalist, you will network with many people especially during press briefings. You meet journalists from other organizations and when you write someone’s story you are always making new connections.

In America, I have noticed journalism is different, very fast, and there are many organizations that sell news. It is more commercial and each state has their own news so it is easy to not know what is going on in other states if I do not follow up on the re-cap of nationwide news. The news is technologically advanced and AI is being introduced to news. There sometimes is a mistrust in news when it comes to disinformation especially now that elections are coming up.

Engagement Resources
  • National Press Club – There are many organizations that has supported me as a journalist support journalists such as the National Press Club, which is the meeting place in Washington DC for newsmakers and journalists. It serves its members through professional development activities that strengthens their skills.
  • Committee to Protect Journalists – The Committee to Protect Journalists is an independent, nonprofit organization that promotes press freedom worldwide. The defend the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal and provides financial and psychological support as well.
  • IJNET – International journalists network delivers the latest on global media innovation, news apps and tools, training opportunities and expert advice for professional and emerging journalists worldwide.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

A Closer Look at US Global Leadership: Navigating the Complex Dynamics of Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

A Closer Look at US Global Leadership: Navigating the Complex Dynamics of Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

A Closer Look at US Global Leadership: Navigating the Complex Dynamics of Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

Foreign Policy Brief #116 | By: Inijah Quadri | January 29, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.theguardian.com

__________________________________

In an era of evolving geopolitical landscapes, the United States faces the challenge of exerting effective global leadership amidst complex international conflicts and tensions. Three prominent areas of concern include the situations in Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan. Each region presents unique challenges that test U.S. foreign policy principles, strategic interests, and its commitment to global stability. These situations require nuanced approaches, balancing the pursuit of peace, respect for national sovereignty, and the need to uphold international law.

Analysis

a. Ukraine: The U.S.’s support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia demonstrates a strong commitment to European security and the principles of national sovereignty. This involvement, marked by substantial military aid to Ukraine and sanctions against Russia, not only underscores the long-term impact of U.S. foreign policy on European stability but also influences Russia’s international stance. While this support is a significant factor in the ongoing conflict, it also brings into question the extent and implications of U.S. involvement, especially in terms of potential escalation and destabilization within the broader European region. Such a scenario could lead to shifts in military and economic alliances across Europe.

Nevertheless, the current approach aligns with the success seen in historical contexts, such as U.S. support in the Balkans during the 1990s, which helped to stabilize the region post-conflict. However, in this instance, the US was instrumental in helping to broker a peace deal. Continuing with existing support, the U.S. should likewise bolster diplomatic efforts through platforms like the United Nations, NATO, and possibly BRICS, to seek a peaceful resolution, mirroring successful diplomatic engagements like the Dayton Agreement.

It is worth noting that the U.S.’s stance on Ukraine is deeply intertwined with its domestic politics. Notably, the MAGA Republicans have shown reluctance to support further funding for Ukraine, tying their approval to demands for stricter immigration policies. This standoff reflects a broader political divide within the U.S., where foreign policy objectives are increasingly used as leverage in domestic policy negotiations. Such internal conflicts not only complicate the U.S.’s commitment to Ukraine but also send mixed signals to international allies and adversaries alike.

b. Gaza: The Gaza Strip’s situation, exacerbated by the Israel-Palestine conflict, presents a different challenge. In the context of Israel and Gaza, President Biden faces pressure from progressive Democrats urging a more balanced approach towards the Israel-Palestine conflict. This faction advocates for greater support of Palestinian rights, posing a challenge to the traditional U.S. foreign policy that heavily favors Israel. While the situation in Gaza is particularly dire, with frequent humanitarian crises, the U.S. has historically been a staunch ally of Israel. Yet it faces calls to address the humanitarian needs in Gaza and promote a just solution to the conflict.

To avoid being labeled as two-faced, this necessitates a careful balance of U.S. foreign policy. Biden’s navigation of these internal pressures is also delicate, as he must balance progressive demands with the potential backlash from a significant domestic Jewish constituency, which traditionally influences U.S. policy in the region.

Here, the U.S. has the opportunity to play a constructive role by increasing humanitarian aid and facilitating dialogue. Learning from the success of the Oslo Accords in the 1990s, in which the U.S. played a pivotal role in mediating, similar diplomatic efforts could be employed to rejuvenate peace talks. The U.S. can leverage its influence to support UN resolutions that focus on alleviating the crisis and promoting a two-state solution.

c. Taiwan: Taiwan’s situation involves the U.S.’s strategic interests in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly the island’s role as a major chip manufacturer. This economic interdependence complicates the U.S.’s role in the region. While supporting Taiwan’s defense capabilities is crucial for maintaining regional stability and securing U.S. economic interests, any significant shift in policy could have domestic economic repercussions. Additionally, the U.S. must consider the broader impact on its relationship with China, a key player in global economics and politics.

The U.S. follows a policy of strategic ambiguity towards Taiwan, supporting its defense capabilities while not formally recognizing it as an independent state. This stance aims to deter Chinese aggression without provoking a direct conflict. The potential risks of the U.S.’s strategic ambiguity towards Taiwan include misinterpretation by China, possibly leading to miscalculations or unintended escalations. In the current global political climate, this approach risks alienating regional players who seek clear commitments. Thus, while maintaining a balance, the U.S. must be cautious to ensure its policy does not inadvertently escalate tensions or create strategic vulnerabilities.

The U.S. policy of strategic ambiguity, while supporting Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities, is a measured approach to maintaining regional stability. This stance is reminiscent of the U.S.’s Cold War policies, which effectively deterred conflicts through strategic ambiguity. Enhancing diplomatic efforts to reduce cross-strait tensions and encouraging China’s peaceful rise are vital. The U.S. can advocate for Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, drawing on the successful precedent of U.S. support for China’s WTO entry, which facilitated more engagement in global affairs.

The U.S. approach in these regions reflects a balancing act between moral imperatives, strategic interests, and international norms. The effectiveness of U.S. policies in these complex scenarios is a subject of ongoing debate, highlighting the challenges of contemporary global leadership. In each scenario, however, it remains imperative that the U.S. navigate its web of internal pressures and interests while striving to maintain its global leadership role and adhere to its foreign policy principles.

Engagement Resources

  • Council on Foreign Relations (https://www.cfr.org/): Provides in-depth analysis of global issues, including U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan.
  • United States Institute of Peace (https://www.usip.org/): Offers resources on conflict resolution and peacebuilding, relevant to the situations in Ukraine and Gaza.
  • Brookings Institution (https://www.brookings.edu/): Conducts research on U.S. policy in the Asia-Pacific, with a focus on Taiwan and China-U.S. relations.
  • Amnesty International (https://www.amnesty.org/): Provides reports on human rights issues in conflict zones like Gaza.
  • RAND Corporation (https://www.rand.org/): Offers analysis and research on defense and security, relevant to U.S. policy in Ukraine and Taiwan.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Who Will Mitt Romney’s Successor Be?

Who Will Mitt Romney’s Successor Be?

Who Will Mitt Romney’s Successor Be?

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #119 | By: Courtney Denning | January 29, 2024
Photo taken from: www.motherjones.com
__________________________________

Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) is stepping down from his position in Congress, leaving a Utah Senate seat open in the 2024 election. Romney gained his seat in 2018 after his two bids for the presidency in 2008 and 2012, with him winning the nomination in 2012 but losing to Barack Obama. Prior to this, he served as the governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007.

In recent years, Romney has garnered attention for his criticisms of former president Donald Trump. He has frequently expressed his fears for the future of the Republican Party if it continues in the way he believes Trump is leading it.

The race for his former Senate seat exemplifies this growing divide in the GOP. Since Utah is an overwhelmingly conservative state, the winner of this seat will likely be decided in the Republican primaries on June 25, 2024. Although most are confident that a Republican will win the seat, there are stark differences in the ideologies of the candidates running for this Republican nomination. The winner of this race will signal whether the traditional “Romney Conservatism” or the emerging “Trump Republicanism” will dominate the state’s politics.

Analysis:

Here are profiles of the leading candidates to replace Romney:

Rep. John Curtis 

Curtis has been serving in Congress as a Representative of Utah’s 3rd district since 2017. An early survey taken even before he announced he was running for the spot placed Curtis as the front-runner for the election. Unlike other prominent Utah politicians, Curtis has not endorsed Donald Trump, but has promised to vote for him if he is chosen as the presidential nominee.

Brent Orrin Hatch 

Brent Orrin Hatch is running for the same seat that his father, Orrin Hatch, held for 42 years. Hatch has been running his own law private practice for the past 30 years, and he focuses his campaign on fiscal responsibility and decreasing the budget deficit. He has officially endorsed Donald Trump for president.

Brad Wilson 

Utah’s current Speaker of the House, Brad Wilson, is stepping down to run for the Senate as a self-proclaimed “conservative fighter” and Trump supporter.

Trent Staggs 

Staggs, the soon-to-be former Mayor of Riverton, UT, has also thrown his hat into the ring. In his campaign video announcing his candidacy, Staggs has endorsed Trump and set himself apart from Romney, saying that he’s “not a career politician or a Massachusetts millionaire.” Staggs is running in opposition to Romney’s legacy, criticizing his voting record and positioning himself as an uncompromising conservative.

Carolyn Phippen

Phippen, a former staff member for Utah Sen. Mike Lee, also represents a stronger conservative push for the Senate seat. She refers to herself as “not a politician” and publicly aligns with Trump. She is anti-federal spending, pro-life, pro-border wall, and staunchly conservative.

Josh Randall 

Randall’s campaign centers strong families and “Utah values” with an emphasis on Christian virtues. His run is set apart by a frugal budget. Randall said that he wants to model his political career after that of current Senator Mike Lee, a strong supporter of Trump.

Democrat Archie Williams III and Robert Newcomb of the Independent American Party are also running for Utah’s Senate Seat.

Most candidates running for this Senate position have been outspoken supporters of Donald Trump, marking a potential shift from the legacy left by Romney. The one candidate that could be expected to follow more closely in Romney’s ideological footsteps is Rep. John Curtis, who has not yet officially endorsed Trump.

Engagement Resources:

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Congressional Budget Struggles

Congressional Budget Struggles

Congressional Budget Struggles

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #118 | By: William Bourque | January 26, 2024
Photo taken from: www.finance.yahoo.com
__________________________________

The Congressional budget process is long and complex, throwing even the wonkiest of policy nerds for a loop. The biggest issue with the appropriation of funds is that the GOP doesn’t really want to do it. With Speaker McCarthy, GOP hardliners insisted that if he were to pass a continuing resolution that it would be the end of his tenure…and they weren’t bluffing. Speaker Johnson has put himself in a precarious position to say the least.

With a recently passed continuing resolution, Congress will have until March 1st for some agencies and March 8th for others. The legislation continues funding the government at current levels through that time, which hopefully allows time for a Republican-led House to get in order to pass a budget. The Senate, led by a slim Democratic majority, has generally been the leader in budget negotiations, with House Freedom Caucus members and inexperienced Speaker Mike Johnson struggling to find agreement.

The new agreement essentially gives the GOP more time to negotiate with the White House on immigration reform and Ukraine funding. Many GOP insiders say that they are likely to cave on the Ukraine funding if it means getting promises on harder immigration policy from the Biden Administration. In reality, the biggest spending fights this year will be on foreign spending on weapons and support for Ukraine and Israel, as well as the ongoing influx of immigration. The funding for Ukraine is something that is expected to be maintained, albeit at a lower rate. Funding for Israel, however, may be on the chopping block due to public opinion on the Israeli government’s actions in the occupied Gaza Strip. In a December poll by Pew, 59% of respondents believed that the Israeli government was at least partially responsible for the ongoing war. Biden’s support amongst progressives, Arab-Americans, and Americans under 25 has been waning over his handling of the conflict—and Congress will likely follow.

With immigration spending, many Republicans are focused on the Southern border, perhaps too much. Essentially, the Biden White House is going to make a deal with the GOP that they may have been aiming for anyways—but the GOP will provide sufficient political cover to make it happen. The money will likely be allocated for more border patrol officers as well as giving more ability to deport individuals who may be seen as high-threat. Immigration will be a top issue in the 2024 Presidential election, which is why Biden would be smart to take a harder line.

While they won’t be hugely controversial, there are a few other items that will be high-spend issues this year. Look for increased spending to come out of a final rule-making process for many government agencies as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law continues ramping up. These projects are key in many rural communities across the nation, and Biden will speak at length about this achievement on the campaign trail. Another huge Biden win was the Inflation Reduction Act, which is largely a climate and energy bill. Look for an increase in appropriations for renewable energy projects as well as transmission across the nation. This funding will be used to build utility-scale solar and wind power platforms as well as invest in the new hydrogen hubs program. Offshore wind projects are also becoming a present-day item, so expect to see increased funding in this year’s appropriations package—whenever it gets passed.

The controversial Congressional budget items will continue to be discussed up to the March 1st and 8th deadlines—with the ever-present threat of shutdown looming. Expect more of the same nonsense from Republicans, who will certainly lose their majority come January ’25.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Situation Update: The Ukraine Crisis

Situation Update: The Ukraine Crisis

Situation Update: The Ukraine Crisis

Foreign Policy Brief #115 | By: Ibrahim Castro | January 25, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.thehill.com

__________________________________

Fighting on the ground

For the past few weeks the two sides have been trading missile and drone attacks, most recently at least 25 people have been killed and 20 others injured after a market on the outskirts of the Russian-controlled city of Donetsk. In the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv at least 17 people have been seriously injured last week, after Russian missiles hit residential buildings in the city. Kharkiv lies just 19 miles from the border with Russia in Ukraine’s northeast and has come under frequent bombardment since the beginning of the war. Russian artillery has frequently hit civilian infrastructure in Ukraine drawing widespread condemnation.

Late last week four oil tanks at a large storage facility in the Russian town of Klintsy in its western Bryansk region caught fire after the military shot down a Ukrainian strike drone. The fire caused by the strikes forced Russia to suspend operations at a huge Baltic Sea fuel export terminal. Additionally a drone attack on a bus stop in the Russian city of Belgorod killed 25 civilians last month, the deadliest attack on Russian territory since the start of the conflict.

The tit for tat strikes are emblematic of the stalemate the war has come, with both sides able to inflict damage but with neither side being able to overtake the other. This winter Ukrainian forces have taken a more defensive position in many areas of the frontlines after a counteroffensive last year was unable to break through heavily defended Russian lines in the occupied territories.

Zelenskyy urges Western allies for more support

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in a recent speech at DAVOS has urged the West to tighten sanctions against Russia and step up its support for Kyiv to ensure that Moscow does not win the war.  The first months of the war in 2022 saw the country lose a third of its economic output to occupation and destruction because Russia controls the heartland of Ukraine’s heavy industry. President Zelensky called for some of the Russian billions seized by world banks to be sent to rebuild Ukraine. Though Europe’s central bankers have been skeptical about setting a difficult legal precedent that could undermine global financial stability. It would mean that other countries may think twice about placing their assets in the West if they know those same assets could be seized.

Arming Ukraine

Last week Russia’s top diplomat Sergey Lavrov rejected a US proposal to resume  dialogue on nuclear arms control, saying that it was impossible to engage in such talks while Washington provides military support to Ukraine. Lavrov charged that Washington’s push for the revival of nuclear talks has been driven by a desire to resume inspections of Russia’s nuclear weapons sites.  He reaffirmed that Russia will pursue what it calls the “special military operation” regardless of Western pressure.

Roughly $137 billion in military and financial aid to Ukraine remains stalled in Washington and Brussels. As a result individual European allies have begun to make bilateral pledges worth billions to provide arms to Ukraine this year. For example, Estonian President Alar Karis said last week that Estonia would provide 1.2 billion euros in military assistance including howitzers and ammunition over the next four years. Estonia, which also shares a border with Russia, stated last November that it was raising defense spending to 3% of its GDP and urged other European nations to double their expenditure. Last year most EU countries committed to an increase in military spending, a record $58 billion was allocated to military investments, and were geared overwhelmingly towards the procurement of new equipment.

Check out usrenewnews.org/Ukraine for more coverage on the Ukraine crisis. Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

x
x
Support fearless journalism! Your contribution, big or small, dismantles corruption and sparks meaningful change. As an independent outlet, we rely on readers like you to champion the cause of transparent and accountable governance. Every donation fuels our mission for insightful policy reporting, a cornerstone for informed citizenship. Help safeguard democracy from tyrants—donate today. Your generosity fosters hope for a just and equitable society.

Pin It on Pinterest