JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES
Latest Jobs Posts
Teacher Walkouts Spreading Throughout Red States
Brief # 21 Education Summary Teachers in Oklahoma, Kentucky and Arizona have been participating in walkouts in an effort to raise salary increases for teachers and increase funding for their schools. These protests come in the wake of teacher walkouts in West Virginia...
Trump Establishes Federal Commission on School Safety
Education Brief #22 Summary In a White House briefing statement issued on March 12, 2018, President Trump established the Federal Commission on School Safety chaired by Education Secretary Betsey DeVos. The commission was established to address school safety and “a...
Is The Department of Housing and Urban Development Becoming Hostile To Racial Equality Efforts?
On March 28, 2018, a New York Times investigation reported that Dr. Ben Carson, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), had ordered the Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Division at the federal agency to pause investigations into violations of federal fair housing laws.
Trump Says ‘NO MORE DACA DEAL!’
On Easter Sunday, before entering services, Trump took to Twitter to announce that there would be “no more DACA deal.” Speaking with reporters before going to church, Trump cited that an influx of Mexican border crossings, for which he has no evidence to back up, put a wrench in the deal…
Trump Administration to Add Citizenship Question to Census; California Sues
On Monday, March 26, The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration will be adding a question on citizenship to the 2020 U.S. Census. This decision was made at the request of the Department of Justice
Trump Appoints John Bolton as New National Security Adviser
On March 22nd, only a week after the replacement of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Trump announced the departure of national security adviser General H.R. McMaster. On April 9th, the seat will be filled- for the third time in fourteen months- by John Bolton.
Special Legal Status Ended for Liberian Community
On Tuesday, March 27, The New York Times reported that the Trump administration will be terminating Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) for the Liberian community. DED is a non-specific temporary immigration status that enables citizens from countries around the world experiencing conflict, natural disaster, or disease to live and work in the United States while the home country’s government restores living conditions.
The Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on Healthcare for Women and LGBTQIA+
In the past year, Trump and his administration have championed actions that threaten the right to adequate healthcare for women and LGBTQIA+ populations. The latest actions in the past month were found primarily in a report last week detailing the elimination of online resources for lesbian and bisexual health on the Department of Health and Human Services website.
The Poorly Written Anti – Sex Trafficking Bill; Proposed Congressional Bill
On February 27, 2018, the House of Representatives passed the “Allow States To Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act” by a vote of 388 to 25. Three weeks later on March 21, 2018, the Senate approved the bill by an overwhelming 97 to 2 vote.
DOJ Expansion/Modernization of Institutional Hearing Program
Department of Justice Memo
Issued on March 30, 2017
Policy Summary
Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Department of Justice would take steps to ‘expand and modernize’ the Department’s Institutional Hearing Program (IHP). The IHP is the mechanism by which immigration judges determine whether noncitizens in American prisons are deportable during the term of their sentence through in-person and teleconference immigration removal proceedings. In its 35 years, over 200,000 people have been processed by this program. The changes that AG Sessions announced would bring immigration to correctional facilities rather than having the individual taken to ICE detention facilities for hearings, increase teleconferencing capabilities and other infrastructure to help conduct proceedings, and improve coordination between the different DOJ offices involved. LEARN MORE
Analysis
In the press release announcing the changes, AG Sessions claims that these improvements will “speed the process of deporting incarcerated criminal aliens and will reduce costs.” Attempting to quickly expand and hasten the pace at which a justice-related program operates threatens the ability of individuals to receive a fair trial. Virginia immigration lawyer Paul Wickham Schmidt has noted a few concerning points on this note. Schmidt claims from personal experience that the IHP has had issues getting attorneys to represent individuals, getting televideo equipment to work, and scheduling hearings based on priority in a logical way. All of these problems are likely to worsen if the rate of hearings is hastened without appropriate attention to detail. Perhaps most importantly, Schmidt also notes that this announced change is just the latest in a long string of “new priorities” in immigration enforcement – suggesting that the DOJ is more concerned with appearing to act on the President’s mandate on immigration than with making key decisions on how to enforce immigration law. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Local Options for Protecting Immigrants – This document hosted by the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights notes what steps local governments can take to protect immigrants against federal government actions.
- Support a Local Solidarity Network in Your Area – Organizations are rapidly forming on a local level across the country to protect the rights of undocumented immigrants and to ensure that law enforcement agencies are acting legally and justly as they seek to enforce these new executive orders. Examples include the Washington Immigrant Solidarity Network and Mi Casa es Su Casa (San Diego).
- Resistance Manual – Crisis Resources – If you know someone who is facing immigration troubles, please share this compendium of legal resources and relevant nonprofit organizations with them.
This brief was compiled by Oliver Bjornsson. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact oliver@usresistnews.org.
Presidential Memorandum Regarding Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline; Issuance of Presidential Permit
Presidential Memorandum and Presidential Permit
January 24, 2017 and March 24, 2017, respectively
Policy Summary
Two months after President Trump released a presidential memoranda directing the Secretaries of State, the Army, and the Interior to expedite approval for the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline the Department of State has issued a Presidential permit to TransCanada authorizing the company to “construct, connect, operate, and maintain pipeline facilities” for the importation of crude oil. The Trump administration, along with industry and Republican proponents, argues that the pipeline will help create jobs and secure national energy security. LEARN MORE
Analysis
The Keystone XL Pipeline would enable oil companies to transport oil sludge from Canada and North Dakota to Gulf Coast refineries from which they could be easily exported. While Trump boasts the creation of 28,000 jobs from the pipeline, energy historian and consultant Ellen Wald explains that estimates for construction jobs are misleading because they are often inaccurate, they include vague “spin-off” jobs, and the jobs are short-term (a 2014 State Department review estimates only 35 permanent jobs would be created). Framing the project’s job creation as a way of addressing unemployment distorts the actual impacts. Opponents of the pipeline argue that “future demand has been put in question” by high American oil production, green energy, and energy efficient cars and that excess oil from the pipeline will be exported, untouched by U.S. citizens. Clifford Krauss for the New York Times adds that declining oil prices have made expensive oil sand extraction unattractive for oil producers many of whom have sold their assets and abandoned development projects. Environmental groups argue that the pipeline will increase the profitability and production of tar sands oil which produce 81 percent greater greenhouse gas emissions than other forms of oil accelerating the devastating effects of climate change. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Natural Resources Defense Council – a non-profit international environmental advocacy group committed to fighting Trump’s “environmental assault” and using “every tool in the kit to stop this dangerous tar sands oil pipeline project.”
- Greenpeace – an international environmental NGO that uses direct action, lobbying, research, and ecotage to raise public awareness and to influence the public and private sectors.
- Sierra Club – the nation’s largest environmental preservation organization; recent focuses include green energy, mitigating global warming, and opposing coal.
This brief was compiled by Conor Downey. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief, please contact conor@usresistnews.org.
Human Rights Conditions Dropped on Arms Sale to Bahrain
State Department Policy
Issued on March 29th, 2017
Policy Summary
On March 29th, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson decided to proceed with a sale of F-16 fighter jets to Bahrain without human rights stipulations. The deal, which was proctored by President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, originally included conditions to release political opponents from prison and to suspend harsh crackdowns of pro-democracy advocates in the country. The United States regularly requires its allies to meet certain political or economic guidelines in order to receive aid. Bahrain is a critical ally of the United States with a strategic position in the Middle East, and the nation hosts the United States Navy’s Fifth Fleet. LEARN MORE
Analysis
Removing human rights requirements for Bahrain is dangerous and counterproductive. Because the State Department no longer holds briefings, many analysts and experts can only speculate on the impacts of this deal. This new policy endorses political crackdown and discredits our reputation abroad. There are very few indications that this will increase security in the Middle East, and there are some implications of possible bias from Tillerson’s former company or connections to Lockheed-Martin. Finally, as the State Department begins to relax on some restrictions, we can only expect that similar policy will be taken in Yemen or Saudi Arabia, two other nations with abysmal human rights records. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Human Rights Watch — An organization which works to report on human rights violations and protect individual citizens across the globe.
- Reprieve — A group of lawyers and investigators who defend the legal rights of many people suffering human rights’ abuses.
- Amnesty International — Amnesty International conducts international research, advocates on behalf of the oppressed, and carries out campaigns to protect the vulnerable from human rights’ infringements.
This Brief was compiled by Jacob Malinowski. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact jacob@usresistnews.org.
Senate and House of Representatives Joint Resolution Repealing Online Privacy Protections For Customers of A Telecommunications Service Carrier
Proposed Congressional Legislation
Approved by the Senate on March 23, 2017
Approved by the House on March 28, 2017
Policy Summary
In the United States Congress, a joint resolution was introduced that seeks to overrule a prior regulation promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). On January 3, 2017, the “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services” went into effect implementing rules that would [1] protect customer proprietary information (personal information) and [2] require customer approval requirements for the use and disclosure of a customer’s personal information by the service carrier. The resolution introduced in Congress states that “Congress disapproves of the rule submitted” and “such rule shall have no force or effect.” The Senate approved the resolution on March 23, 2017, by a 50 – 48 vote. The House of Representatives passed a companion resolution on March 28, 2017, by a 215 – 205 vote. The bill has now been sent to President Trump who is expected to sign the bill. LEARN MORE
Analysis
The proposed legislation is a step in the wrong direction. The effect of nullifying the FCC rule is that service carriers who provide a platform for people to go online now have no limits on what they are permitted to do with the personal information they collect from their customers. A customer’s personal information (name, address, phone numbers and the content of their communications) can be used to identify specific people and reasonably link them to the information they view and download on the Internet. Without the protection of the FCC rule, service carriers can distribute and/or sell the information which will expose customers to unwanted target advertising as well as increased instances of identity theft and criminal stalking. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) – foundation focused on defending your rights in the digital world.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) – research center dedicated to online privacy and civil liberty issues.
This brief was compiled by Rod Maggay. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief, please contact rod@usresistnews.org.
Trumpcare’s Voting Fiasco
The failure of the American Health Care Act
Scheduled Vote Date: March 23, Rescheduled Vote Date: March 24
Policy Summary
Despite the GOP’s efforts to lobby enough votes for the American Health Care Act (AHCA) to pass the House, they were not able to secure the necessary votes before the scheduled vote on Thursday, March 23. The Trump administration opted to postpone the vote until the follow day hoping they could gain some support. Trump claimed that if it did not pass in the House vote, he is “done with health care.” The administration and House GOP released various changes to the original bill in an effort to win more votes. The changes included requiring able-bodied Medicaid recipients to work, participate in job training programs, or do community service, and allow states to shift Medicaid funding to a block grant. However, the GOP was never able to gain the support they needed and pulled the bill from the floor on Friday. LEARN MORE
Analysis
It was not a surprise that the bill lacked support. After the revisions, the Congressional Budget Office analyzed the updated bill and reported that roughly 24 million Americans would lose coverage (the same estimate as the original bill). Also, the federal deficit would be reduced by $150 billion between 2017 and 2026 instead of the $337 billion that was projected from the original version. In other words, the same number of people would be covered but it would cost more than the original bill. As for the American people, 56% disapproved of the GOP bill and 14% thought they would lose their health insurance under the new plan. President Trump’s failure to pass his bill does not mean that Obamacare is safe. The President is keeping his promise to leave health care alone for now and his plan going forward is to “let Obamacare explode.” However, the Trump administration may try to undermine the law or revisit it later on, which leaves the consumers and insurers unsure what to expect in the future. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- What Do I Do About Trump – This website is pretty self-explanatory: it offers people who are upset about Trump’s policies ways to get involved and voice opinions.
- Organization for Action – This progressive organization fights for changes that promote both community and national development and equity. The site currently has the option to sign a petition to protect Obamacare.
This brief was compiled by Ann Furbush. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact ann@usresistnews.org.
State Department Issues Keystone XL Pipeline Permit
State Department Permit
Issued on March 24, 2017
Policy Summary
A press release issued on March 24th by the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs stated that a permit was issued to TransCanada for the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The statement detailed that this pipeline “would serve the national interest”, and follows President Trump’s call for the development of the pipeline. It would run from Canada to Nebraska and bring about 830,000 barrels of oil into the United States every day. The pipeline stalled under President Obama and was protested extensively by environmental activists and indigenous groups. The pipeline is not guaranteed, however, and the State of Nebraska must complete the authorization. LEARN MORE
Analysis
The Keystone XL pipeline will have a negative impact on almost every affected sector. While it will create some temporary construction jobs, many of these will be Canadian, and it will only leave about 35 permanent jobs in the United States. While the oil giants argue that the oil sands will be excavated either way, a steady fall in oil prices seems to dispute this. Some of the oil may be refined in the United States, but oil exports are primarily sensitive to demand, not supply. Furthermore, construction of the pipeline undermines American efforts to decrease dependencies on fossil fuels. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Environment America — A grassroots environmental group that works to protect the environment and slow climate change through organizational and legislative advocacy.
- Climate Action Network — A global network of NGOs that work to slow the effects of climate change on an individual and national level.
- American Council on Renewable Energy — ACORE is a non-profit dedicated to expanding renewable energy in the United States, and it works with not only the government but also industry leaders and financial institutions.
This brief was compiled by Jacob Malinowski. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact jacob@usresistnews.org.
Selective Visa Application Restrictions
State Department Diplomatic Memorandum
Issued on March 15, 2017
Policy Summary
In instructions sent to all U.S embassies and consulates on March 15, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson began to outline a complicated process that some visa applicants may need to undergo. While the memo remains vague, they specifically reference that certain “population sets” would be subject to “increased scrutiny”, regardless of whether they were eligible for visas prior to the new restrictions. In line with President Trump’s calls for “extreme vetting”, the memo originally enumerated the six countries under Trump’s executive order as high priorities. This has since been redacted, but calls for investigating social media profiles and email accounts remain. LEARN MORE (UPDATE)
Analysis
These new restrictions seem to fulfill Trump’s discriminatory ideas of banning people based on ethnicity or national origin. Not only does the United States already use a very complicated and thorough vetting process, but processes like this have failed in the past. Racist policy hurts citizens domestically, and it sends negative messages to our allies abroad and the rest of the international community. Regardless of the fate of Trump’s new executive order, Tillerson may be able to succeed with these new guidelines because their intentionally nebulous nature will make them harder to fight legally. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Amnesty International — An organization that works across the globe to secure justice and human rights for all citizens, especially refugees and immigrants.
- Refugee International — An NGO that supports refugees and displaced people in many regions across the globe through donations and legal and personal assistance.
- Immigration Advocates Network — A collection of groups and organizations that provide labor and legal advice to immigrants as well as facilitates logistical and operational coordination between NGOs
This brief was compiled by Jacob Malinowski. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact jacob@usresistnews.org.
Schools Must Do More for Disabled Students
Supreme Court Decision
Announced on March 22, 2017
Policy Summary
The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that schools must raise the bar on educational standards for disabled students. They rejected past rulings stating that the Individuals with Disabilities Act entitling disabled students to a free appropriate public education that is tailored to their needs, which simply meant that schools were only required to show some annual gains, or “more than de minimis” (more than the minimum). As a result of the current case, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, schools must now provide their disabled students with the opportunity to make “appropriately ambitious progress.” LEARN MORE
Analysis
Prior to this landmark Supreme Court ruling, in 2008 a similar case was ruled upon by none other than Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch who applied the bare minimum standard. Ironically, Gorsuch was testifying before the senate judiciary committee at the time the ruling was announced. He was subsequently questioned about the issue. Gorsuch noted that within the 2008 case he was simply following the precedent set by past appeals court rulings. Chief Justice Roberts, on the other hand, wrote in his opinion, “When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing “merely more than de minimis” progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- RespectAbility – An organization with a mission is to fight for more opportunities for and reject the stigmas associated with people with mental disabilities.
- Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law – The Bazelon Center’s mission is to protect the rights of both children and adults with mental disabilities.
- Understood – A partnership built out of 15 non-profit organizations, Understood is a resource for the millions of parents whose children ages 3-20, are struggling with learning and attention issues.
This brief was compiled by Cindy Stansbury. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact, cindy@usresistnews.org.
Effects of the Budget on Education
Budget Plan
Announced on March 13, 2017
Policy Summary
Donald Trump’s new budget plan proposes cutting 13.5 percent or $9.2 billion from education, removing $2.4 billion in grants going towards teacher training and $1.2 billion earmarked for summer and afterschool programs. The budget blueprint reduces or eliminates funding for need-based aid for college students, federal work study, and grant programs for low-income, disabled or first-generation students among other cuts. This paves the way for $1.4 billion to go towards a school choice program, which will ramp up to $20 billion per year; $250 million will be sent to a private school choice option and $168 million will be sent to charter schools. $1 billion is set to go to the federal Title 1 program. LEARN MORE
Analysis
“An assault on the American Dream,” is what John King Jr., education secretary under Barack Obama said of Trump’s proposal, noting the cuts “will disproportionately harm the poor and children of color.” Trump is negating issues as dire as college affordability and accessibility ultimately taking over $5 million in support from needy children. For the 1.6 million children who participate in the after-school programs set to lose funding, some say this means losing the program that increased their likelihood to graduate and excel in the labor market. In tandem with the cuts to teacher training, this could impact the overall quality of education children would receive; all for the controversial school choice program. LEARN MORE
Engagement Resources
- Contact Your State Legislators – Budgets cannot pass without legislative support!
- The Afterschool Alliance – An organization dedicated to raising awareness of the importance of after-school programs.
- The Council for Opportunity in Education – Donate and support this nonprofit geared toward furthering the expansion of college opportunities for disabled, first-generation and low-income students.
This brief was compiled by Cindy Stansbury. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief please contact cindy@usresistnews.org.
Effects of the Budget on Immigration
Budget Proposal
Released on March 16, 2017
Policy Summary
House Speaker Paul Ryan proposed a budget estimate for 2017 that cuts funding to a wide variety of domestic priorities in order increase funding for the Department of Defense by $30 billion dollars and the Department of Homeland Security by $3 billion dollars. The projected results of this move are discussed across U.S. RESIST NEWS. The increase in funding to the DHS is intended to enable the enforcement of the executive orders passed by President Trump that have already been addressed on this site, but the budget would also impact Trump’s immigration plan through its cuts to several agencies that are essential for the enforcement of immigration law such as FEMA (by 11 percent), the Coast Guard (14%), and the TSA (11%). LEARN MORE
Analysis
This combination of impacts would suggest either that the Trump administration is more concerned with the arrival of undocumented immigrants from Mexico by the land border than by sea or by plane, or that they are less concerned with stopping the flow of undocumented immigrants than they are with the appearance of fulfilling campaign promises (building the wall and increasing funding to securing the physical border). In 2016, the Coast Guard intercepted 6,346 undocumented immigrants, resulting in a 320% increase in demand for Coast Guard assets to train Central American forces in interdiction efforts. The budget ignores this developing trend in immigration. The budget also appears to be counterintuitive to Trump’s promises to help local law enforcement enforce immigration laws, as it includes eliminating the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, which reimburses jails for the short-term detention of undocumented immigrants.
Engagement Resources
- Indivisible Guide – This guide, put together by former congressional staffers, provides extensive advice on the best way to make your voice heard by your local representatives, which could be crucial in determining the fate of this budget proposal.
- Resistance Manual – Crisis Resources – If you know someone who is facing immigration troubles, please share this compendium of legal resources and relevant nonprofit organizations with them.
This brief was compiled by Oliver Bjornsson. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief, please contact oliver@usresistnews.org.