JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES
Latest Jobs Posts
Navigating Identity and Strife: Hala’s Tale in the Israel-Hamas Conflict
Brief #100 – Foreign Policy Brief
by Aziza Taslaq
Unveiling the layers of her experiences, Hala sheds light on the impact of the ongoing conflict on her daily life, perspectives, and aspirations for a just resolution.
The Week That Was: Global News in Review
Brief #99 – Foreign Policy Brief
by Abran C
Growing conflict and escalating violence has now uprooted a staggering 6.9 million people in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
From a Square to a Triangle: An Analysis of Modern Issues in Education and Immigration
Brief #135 – Immigration Policy Brief
by Rudy Lurz
Education as a field typically distances itself from the activist rhetoric which plagues immigration reform efforts.
What to expect from Speaker Johnson
Brief #108 – Elections & Politics Policy Brief
by William Borque
The fourth-term Congressman out of Western Louisiana was not on many Bingo cards as the next speaker of the house…but here we are.
A Closer Look at Trump’s Criminal Defense
Brief #105 – Elections & Politics Policy Brief
by Abigail Hunt
Former President Donald Trump faces federal charges for tampering with the 2020 election.
Examining Competitive US House Races in the South
Brief #107 – Elections & Politics Policy Brief
by Ian Milden
The South has largely not been friendly to Democrats in recent election cycles due to Republicans’ control of the redistricting process and increasing hostility to the Democratic Party…
A Look at the Racketeering Case Against Trump in Georgia
Brief #106 – Elections & Politics Policy Brief
by Abigail Hunt
In the state of Georgia, Trump is currently out on a $200,000 bond for 13 felony indictments.
An Orthodox Jewish View of the Israel-Hamas Conflict
Brief #98 – Foreign Policy Brief
by Ester Avisror
It matches Hamas’s use of Islam to justify the extinction of Jews with the use of old Testament scripture to justify whatever it takes to “exterminate” Hamas. Here is an edited version of a conversation with an Israeli orthodox rabbi.
In The Shadow of the Israel-Hamas Conflict: One Palestinian Perspective
Brief #97 – Foreign Policy Brief
by Aziza Taslaq
In this interview, we dig deeper into the experiences and perspectives of Sara, a young woman from the West Bank with roots in the city of Nablus, Palestine.
Higher Education Doesn’t Have to Mean Higher Costs
Higher Education Doesn’t Have to Mean Higher Costs
Education Policy Brief #85 | By: Steve Piazza | August 21, 2023
Photo taken from: www.salon.com
__________________________________
The rising cost of public higher education starts with tuition policy implemented by varying governing structures within each state. According to the Education Commission of the States, tuition at public four-year schools in 42 states and D.C is determined by distinctive campus authorities, or boards, with the reach of some spanning multiple campuses. Similar structures for two-year schools are in place, though with modifications to meet different needs.
Most institutional board members are selected by the state governor, though some involve a student or students elected by the student body. Other states like Colorado, Michigan, Nebraska, and Nevada hold a public election. North Carolina’s 13-member board elects eight of its members while the governor elects four and the students one.
The reason that these boards are compelled to raise tuition stems from many different factors. And when they do, it’s not surprising that such changes present hardships on students. Thus, a number of efforts are being made to prevent current and potential students from experiencing obstacles to their education.
Policy Analysis
College tuition rises for a number of reasons, largely from substantial increases in spending across different sectors of academia. These can include elevated expenditures in capital improvement, salaries, athletic and other programs, and goods and services, not to mention just basic adjustments due to inflation.
Reductions in state appropriations and grant money students receive also force policy makers to spend more. Unexpected events such as the pandemic don’t help.
Over the past two decades, the average change in spending for the country’s state flagship schools has been 38% according to a recent report by the Wall Street Journal. And when colleges are spending vast amounts of money, coupled with declining enrollment, increases in student contributions are inevitable. The student share has risen to as much as 42.2.% in 2022 according to a 2023 State Higher Education Finance (SHEF) report.
The effects of tuition increases on students are far reaching. 34% of adults 18-24 say they are not attending college because of the costs, according to a three-year old study by Intelligent.com. Those who do enroll may be forced to drop out, transfer to other less expensive schools, or switch majors.
Higher costs can also cause emotional and psychological problems that may result from food and shelter insecurity, transportation hardships, problems accessing healthcare, widening wealth gaps, and difficulties obtaining books and incidentals.
To address these issues, calls have been going out for caps on tuition and attendance, an increase in the number of grants being offered, more technology-based learning opportunities, and a ceiling on, or the elimination of, student debt.
Perhaps it will take more than that. Some say a structural change is necessary, such as in policies that must be reshaped to make the higher education marketplace more transparent and competitive. But that might not be such an easy thing to accomplish. According to another Wall Street Journal report, governing boards themselves do not even know all the data.
One popular strategy that seems to be gaining traction involves the idea of a tuition free college education. The Campaign for Free College Tuition (CFCT) has been working to build a strong coalition of community, education, and business leaders to establish programs that eliminate tuition for the sake of a sound economy in the future.
Ryan Morgan, CFCT’s CEO, told U.S. RESIST DEMOCRACY NEWS that over the past ten years, 34 states have implemented some sort of free tuition program. The Michigan Reconnect program has proved the most comprehensive, as it provides free tuition for anybody in the state over 25 years old and has its eyes on lowering the minimum age to 21. Massachusetts has been developing a similar model, while other states are watching very closely.
At the federal level, President Biden’s 2024-25 budget includes a $500 million allotment for a free tuition pilot program aimed at select two-year colleges. If these programs are successful, the administration estimates that providing free tuition for two-year schools would cost $90 billion over 10 years. Morgan adds if we include funding for those students who choose to move on to a four-year college, that overall cost could fall roughly somewhere between $9-$18 billion a year.
That may seem like a lot, but improving accessibility to higher education in this country must begin somewhere. As Morgan says “If we’re able to set a baseline for making even two-year community college free, it will prompt a lot of other changes in the education system.”
The whole debate over tuition for many has become a way to criticize and devalue higher education. But there’s enough research that supports the idea that higher education is vital to the country’s place in the world economy, not to mention the future of democracy. The idea of making it affordable supports itself.
Engagement Resources:
- More information on CFCT’s commitment to cost free, higher education can be found on their site: https://www.freecollegenow.org/
- For information on the Michigan Reconnect program, click here.
- The Education Trust is a progressive organization that seeks to remove obstacles to public education. Learn more about their efforts towards college affordability by clicking here.
The Battle Over Autonomous Vehicles in San Francisco
The Battle Over Autonomous Vehicles in San Francisco
Technology Policy Brief #95 | By: Mindy Spatt | August 21, 2023
Photo taken from: www.wired.com/
__________________________________
Waymo and Cruise autonomous vehicles (AVs) have become ubiquitous in some parts of San Francisco and seem to arouse strong feelings wherever they go. So much so that a proposal by the California Public Utilities Commission to allow them to begin charging for rides in San Francisco motivated hundreds to attend the meeting or call in to make public comment. The Commission voted 3 to 1 to approve the AV companys’ application.
Much of the public comment came from people with ties to either the two autonomous car companies or Lyft/Uber. A group of “gig workers” in matching shirts begged the Commission not to let the AVs cut into their desperately needed business. That must have seemed ironic to the taxi drivers who spoke at the meeting and made those same arguments several years ago when the Commission authorized Lyft and Uber to operate over their objections. The gig workers’ argument was counteracted by SEIU local 87, which said Cruise and Waymo would bring actual jobs, with decent pay and benefits, to some of their 3,000 unemployed members.
Handicapped organizations pointed out that Cruise (owned by General Motors) and Waymo (owned by Alphabet) couldn’t yet accommodate wheelchairs, with Lyft and Uber drivers insisting they always, always assisted customers in need. Several leading organizations for the blind offered a different perspective, complaining that drivers were put off by their blindness and often refused to accommodate their dogs. Autonomous Vehicles wouldn’t have that problem, and the technology holds enormous promise for handicapped people.
Since the issue the Commission was voting on was whether the AVs, already allowed to operate on the roads, could offer paid rides, comparisons to Lyft/Uber were inevitable, and outside of the wheelchair issue no one spoke up for the companies from a passenger perspective. Several callers expressed concerns about the high levels of sexual assault and harassment for women in Lyft and Uber cars, problems that would be absent in a driverless car. But women aren’t the only ones who feel fearful in a Lyft or Uber. One caller described getting into cars with drivers who are often “either stoned, drunk, texting or talking.” A representative from Mothers Against Drunk Driving pointed out that despite the groups’ advocacy drunk driving is still a leading cause of death on our roads.
Ties to either side were so apparent that some callers felt the need to preface their comments by saying they were independent of Lyft, Uber, Waymo and Cruise. The callers that rang the truest to me were the bicycle riders. I’m a cyclist and their comments mirrored my experience on San Francisco’s increasingly dangerous streets. “Being almost killed by a driver who is either distracted or speeding is a daily occurrence,” said one. “Cruise and Waymo have never done that.” Another cyclist explained that Cruise and Waymo program their vehicles to obey California’s little known “Three Feet for Safety Law” that requires drivers to leave 3 feet of space when passing a bicycle.
A further irony to the debate is that the rideshare companies have made no secret of their own goal of eventually getting rid of drivers and moving to AVs themselves. Even when that happens they’ll still be just be a small percentage of total vehicles on the road and won’t lessen fears of pedestrians and cyclists who face life and death danger from people-driven cars. As one caller succinctly put it “we should ban human drivers.”
Engagement Resources
- Uber’s first ever safety report discloses 3,045 sexual assaults and nine murders in the US last year By Nick Statt, Dec 5, 2019 https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/5/20997939/uber-safety-report-2018-sexual-assault-ride-hailing-platform-stats
- SF City Attorney Files Motion to Halt Roll-Out of More Self-Driving Cruise and Waymo Robotaxis, By Joe Kukara, Aug. 17, 2023 https://sfist.com/2023/08/17/sf-city-attorney-files-motion-to-halt-roll-out-of-more-self-driving-cruise-and-waymo-robotaxis/
An Early Look at the 2023 Louisiana Governor’s Race
An Early Look at the 2023 Louisiana Governor’s Race
Elections & Politics Policy Brief #90 | By: Ian Milden | August 21, 2023
Photo taken from: lailluminator.com
__________________________________
Louisiana is one of three states to hold an election for Governor in the year before a Presidential election. This brief will explain the unusual dynamics of Louisiana elections and then examine the state of the open-seat race.
Analysis
Louisiana has an open-seat race for Governor this year since Louisiana state law prohibits Governor John Bel Edwards (D-LA) from running for three consecutive terms. He would be eligible to run in 2027 if he is interested. While an open seat race in a deep south state that votes for Republicans for federal office may not catch the interest of too many Democrats outside of the state, Louisiana’s unusual election system has helped Democrats win a few Governor’s races in the state.
Louisiana will hold what is called a “jungle primary”, where all candidates, regardless of their party affiliation, compete in the same primary. The structure of the jungle primary is similar to the first round of voting in Alaska’s new election system, which I discussed in a previous brief. The top two candidates advance to a runoff election. This year, the jungle primary is scheduled to occur on October 14th. The runoff election will occur on November 18th.
This system was implemented during the second term of Governor Edwin Edwards (D-LA), who is not related to the outgoing governor. Edwin Edwards’ first two terms as Governor were from 1971 until 1979. Louisiana prevents Governors from serving three consecutive terms, so Edwin Edwards could not run for reelection in 1979. Edwards calculated that Republicans would consolidate around Dave Treen in the 1979 election and that his own party would fracture and have a weak opponent against Treen in the runoff. Edwards thought that he could reunify the party behind him and win an easy campaign in 1983. Treen won the 1979 election, but he lost to Edwards in 1983. Edwards was defeated in 1987 by fellow Democrat Buddy Roemer due to the state’s financial troubles and Edwards’ corruption scandals. Roemer switched parties while in office, but he failed to secure support from within the state Republican Party, which resulted in voters dividing their support among several Republican candidates in 1991. Edwards was the only prominent Democrat to run, so he made the runoff. Roemer failed to make the runoff, losing the other spot to former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. Edwards won his 4th term in 1991 with help from some very unusual bumper stickers.
The clear route for Democrats to win statewide races in Louisiana is to have one prominent Democrat run against a field of Republicans and hope either a controversial candidate emerges or conflict within the Republican party prevents them from unifying around the Republican candidate who made the runoff.
The prominent Democratic candidate for Governor is Shawn Wilson, the former state Secretary of Transportation. Wilson stepped down from his position just before launching his campaign for Governor. Wilson was endorsed by outgoing Governor John Bel Edwards and Congressman Troy Brown. Wilson only entered the race in March, which gave him a relatively late start.
There’s also a large field of Republican candidates running for Governor. Among the candidates are Attorney General Jeff Landry, State Treasurer John Schroeder, State Senate Majority Leader Sharon Hewitt, state representative Richard Nelson, and former CEO of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry Stephen Waguespack. The state Republican Party caused controversy by endorsing Attorney General Landry, which sparked significant criticism from Landry’s rivals and Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungusser (R-LA), who is running for reelection.
Landry is likely to make the runoff election. Whether he makes it against Wilson or another Republican remains to be seen. I don’t think that the controversy surrounding the state party’s endorsement of Landry is enough to deter other Republicans from supporting him in the runoff. Regardless, I think it is reasonable to assume that Landry is the Republican front-runner and has a good chance to be elected the next Governor of Louisiana.
Engagement Resources
- Shawn Wilson’s Campaign Website: https://www.wilsonforla.com/
- Louisiana Democratic Party; https://louisianademocrats.org/
- Democratic Governors Association Website: https://democraticgovernors.org/
The Week That Was: Global News in Review
The Week That Was: Global News in Review
Foreign Policy Brief #88 | By: Abran C | August 15, 2023
Photo taken from: nytimes.com
__________________________________
Amazon nations summit commits to safeguarding world’s largest rainforest
Early last week eight South American nations, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela ended the first Amazon nations summit in 14 years by signing a declaration to safeguard the world’s largest rainforest. The eight states came to an agreement to stop the rainforest from reaching a point of no return. The heads of state at the summit also challenged countries in the global north to do more to stop the rapid destruction of the Amazon, a task they say cannot fall to just a few countries when the crisis has been caused by so many. Colombian President Gustavo Petro urged world leaders to consider a radical rethinking of global economics, calling for a “Marshall Plan” style strategy in which developing countries’ debts are canceled in exchange for action to protect the climate. The summit itself is progress and a step towards ending deforestation and combating climate change, however, it stopped short of reaching the demands of environmentalists and Indigenous groups. These demands included for all member countries to adopt pledges to completely end illegal deforestation by 2030 and follow in Colombia’s pledge to halt all new oil exploration in the forest. Instead, participating countries will be left to pursue their own individual deforestation goals.
Russia and India go to the moon
Last week two spacecraft, one sent by Russia and the other by India, headed for the Moon’s South Pole, a location that no lunar lander has ever successfully touched down on. The Russian and Indian crafts are on opposing quests to search for water ice and any useful minerals that might be present in the lunar surface. The missions reflect the renewed interest in the Moon for space exploration by a now growing number of nations, not just the usual space powers such as the United States and Europe. National pride will likely also be a factor in pushing ahead as Russia is hoping to prove its continued capabilities in space given that the country’s space programme has been affected by sanctions following its invasion of Ukraine. The recent discovery of pockets of water ice on the nearest celestial body to Earth has caused excitement because hydrogen in the water could potentially be extracted to make rocket fuel on a future Moon base by whomever gets there first.
Migrant boat capsizes in the English channel
According to French maritime officials, last week six people died after a boat carrying migrants headed to Britain sank in the English Channel. It was stated that about 10 passengers were still missing, with 55 having been rescued from the capsized boat. More than 100,000 migrants have crossed the English Channel on small boats from France to England since public records on arrivals began being kept in 2018. As a result French authorities have stepped up patrols and other deterrent measures after London agreed in March to send Paris hundreds of millions of euros annually towards the effort to restrict asylum seekers. The deaths from the boat crossing stem from the lack of legal routes of entry into the UK and France for refugees seeking asylum and looking to reunite with family in the UK. The ruling conservative party in the UK has opted to rely on policies designed to deter people from making the journey through threat of deportation, a strategy that has received much criticism from human rights groups.
Do Trump’s Indictment Defenses Stand a Chance?
Do Trump’s Indictment Defenses Stand a Chance?
Elections & Politics Policy Brief #89 | By: Arvind Salem | August 15, 2023
Photo taken from: theday.com
__________________________________
Off the heels of a superseding indictment adding more charges to his classified documents case, President Donald Trump faces a third indictment: this time related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
On August 1st, President Trump was indicted on four counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy to disenfranchise voters. The indictment specifically acknowledges that Trump had the right to speak about the election results and challenge them through lawful means, but argues that Trump’s actions were outside the bounds of legal conduct and amounted to a criminal conspiracy.
The specific actions that the prosecution, led by Jack Smith, argues were illegal include pressuring state officials to change results to disenfranchise millions of voters, assembling a state of fraudulent electors to change the electoral vote count, trying to weaponize the Department of Justice to conduct fake investigations to falsely claim that there was voter fraud, pressuring Mike Pence to change the outcome of the election, and lying to his supporters to get them to storm the Capitol and obstruct the proceedings.
The indictment also mentions six co-conspirators but leaves them unnamed. However, matching outside information with the descriptions in the indictment have allowed five of them to be identified: former Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman and Sidney Powell, Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark and pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro who orchestrated the fake electors plot. The sixth co-conspirator, who the indictment states is a political consultant, is unknown.
Policy Analysis
The biggest question in any Trump indictment is what is the likelihood that Trump is found guilty and goes to prison. To answer this question, it is necessary to look at Trump’s likely legal defense and the circumstances surrounding the trial.
Trump has three main legal defenses. The first, and most obvious defense, is that Trump had the right to say whatever he wanted to about the election being stolen under the first amendment. While this is true, the first amendment does not protect coercing state officials to overturn election results, using fraud to recruit fake electors, or using the executive branch (the Justice Department and Vice President) to stay in power. The only question here is if the prosecution has enough evidence to prove that Trump did all of these things.
The second defense is that he did not explicitly order Mike Pence to overturn the election results, but he asked him in an aspiration sense (rather than ordering him). The distinction is that asking is protected under the first amendment whereas ordering in this situation would be illegal. To counter this defense, the prosecution could simply call Mike Pence to testify regarding how he understood Trump’s request (whether it was aspirational or an order). Additionally, Trump has other instances where he has ordered people to help him overturn the election such as his infamous quote where he pressured officials in Georgia to “find” him more votes.
The third defense is that Trump sincerely believed that the election was stolen from him. Trump’s lawyers argue that since he was acting on something he sincerely believed in, there was no criminal intent. However, prosecutors may not need to prove that Trump was insincere in his claims to prove criminal intent, but merely prove that Trump knew he was using illegal means. The prosecution could also attach the very premise that Trump thought the election was stolen by focusing on all the instances where his advisors, lawyers, intelligence agencies, the courts, and the Department of Justice all told him that there was no election fraud.
Another complication for Trump arises from the Judge overseeing the case: Tanya Chutkan. Judge Chutkan is known for being extremely harsh to January 6th rioters and called for the people who lied to them to be charged. In one sentencing hearing in 2021 she said, “You have made a very good point that the people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged.” Out of the 31 January 6th defendants that have come before her, she has sentenced every single one to prison time, and is the judge most likely to go beyond punishments requested by the prosecution. Trump’s legal team has made it a priority to move the trial outside of Washington D.C., due to its Democrat leanings, to a state that leans Republican such as West Virginia. If such a motion is successful, it would also mean that Judge Chutkan would not be on the case. However it is worth noting that none of more than a dozen similar motions by riot defendants have succeeded due to the constitutional principle that defendants should be tried wherever the crime allegedly occurred.
Engagement Resources
Winred allows people to donate money to Republican candidates to support their campaign. Readers interested in supporting President Trump or other members of the Republican party may find that this is a useful way to convey their support and help the Republican cause.
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School is an organization that promotes reforms to the American democracy and argues against many practices today such as gerrymandering and mass incarceration. Readers who are concerned about the health of democracy in light of this indictment may wish to support the Brennan Center and help it advance its proposed reforms.
Act for America is an organization that seeks to educate and mobilize Americans against foreign and domestic threats, and advocates for bills to achieve these aims. Those who feel that this indictment constitutes a breakdown of justice may wish to support this organization.
ActBlue allows people to donate to a host of Democratic organizations, candidates, and causes. Readers are likely to find organizations that are supporting the Trump indictment on this site and may wish to donate money to further that cause.
The Impact of Culture Wars on Florida Universities
The Impact of Culture Wars on Florida Universities
Education Policy Brief #84 | By: Rudolph Lurz | August 10, 2023
Photo taken from: https://www.rollingstone.com/
__________________________________
Each year, US News & World Report and The Princeton Review release their rankings of higher education institutions. Practically nothing related to education escapes the quantitative analysis of these publications. They rank undergraduate programs, majors, graduate programs, schools of medicine and law, and even an institution’s reputation for partying. Universities care about these rankings, because higher institutional prestige leads to more applicants. When universities have a larger applicant pool to draw from, they get better incoming freshmen classes. More importantly, a higher ranking from Princeton Review or US News & World Report results in more donations to universities, improving an institution’s bottom line. A national ranking on a best colleges list resulted in a 61% increase in the number of million-dollar donations received, according to a study that evaluated nearly 1,500 colleges and universities. Colleges have even attempted to fudge the numbers which go into generating the annual rankings, with one exposed scandal at Columbia University resulting in a 16-place drop for the Ivy League institution. Following their precipitous fall, Columbia recently withdrew from the US News & World Report rankings, and criticized the “outsized influence” of the rankings system.
Despite the outcry against US News & World Report and Princeton Review, universities are quick to celebrate their rankings when they show improvement or excellence. The University of Florida recently took a victory lap after being ranked in the top five nationally for public research universities. Mori Hosseini, the chair of UF’s Board of Trustees, noted, “UF’s position in the rankings is reflective of our continual, rapid strengthening in teaching, learning and research performance — smaller class sizes, consistently high graduation and retention rates, and the increased value of each student’s degree after graduation—all of which in turn helps Florida be viewed as a national leader.”
The chair of UF’s Faculty Senate, Amanda Phalin, stated, “At the end of the day, our university’s reputation comes down not to what is happening around us, but what we do — our outstanding teaching and research…This ranking is a testament to the skills and passion, individually and collectively, of us, the UF faculty.”
State universities are an engine for economic growth and good jobs. As Phalin noted, the quality of a school’s faculty is an essential part of developing institutional prestige. That prestige is presently facing a threat from the ongoing battle against “wokeness” led by Governor Ron DeSantis. Andrew Gothard, state-level president of the United Faculty of Florida labor union, is predicting a 20-30% turnover rate among faculty at some state universities. Kenneth Nunn, who recently retired after 30 years at the University of Florida’s Levin College of Law, noted, “Florida is toxic…It has been many years since we last hired an entry-level African American faculty member. They’re just not interested in being in a place where something with the stature of critical race theory is being denigrated and attacked.”
Analysis
Rankings like US News & World Report and Princeton Review have long been criticized by academic professionals. They are seen as inaccurate at best, and reinforcing economic inequality at worst. US News & World Report, in response to the backlash from Columbia and other Ivy League institutions, revamped how it calculates its law school rankings, using only publicly-available data instead of the often-flawed internal reports submitted to the publication.
Regardless of the efficacy or ethics of these rankings, the de facto situation is that they are incredibly important for schools. They are a central element, and often the determining factor, of how students make their college choices. Since they are important, they cannot be ignored.
If high-quality professors and students actively avoid Florida’s schools because of a perceived toxic atmosphere, that will inevitably impact Florida’s position on future rankings in US News & World Report and Princeton Review. If the ranking of Florida institutions slips, and a “brain drain” of students and faculty results, the consequence will be a major economic loss for the state.
For Governor DeSantis, who won re-election because of Florida’s strong economic performance during his tenure, that is a direct threat to his viability as a national political candidate in the Republican Party.
The Governor’s culture war is popular with social conservatives, and has provided ample material for stump speeches during his run for the presidency. Social conservatives might be alarmed by CRT and think DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) offices are secret agencies to indoctrinate the youth into the so-called woke agenda. With each attack on LGBTQ+, CRT, DEI, or any other “woke” acronym, Governor DeSantis rallies his base. The issue with Florida’s brain drain is simple.
Scholars, professors, and academic professionals are what the Governor’s base would call “woke”.
These folks do not like the Governor’s policies and are quite alarmed by them. Many elite students from both inside and outside the Sunshine State, who would otherwise have attended schools like the University of Florida, are being scared away.
How many biology and chemistry PhDs are accepting different university jobs at this moment? What other states will reap the rewards of those scientists’ future patents and research grants? How many National Merit Scholars are choosing schools outside Florida? What kind of tax revenue will Florida lose once those graduates create start-up companies in Michigan or Maryland instead of Florida? Florida is already losing millions due to conventions selecting alternate locations. How many millions will it take before the Governor’s vaunted budget surplus begins to wither away?
Governor DeSantis likes to say, “Go woke, go broke,” on the campaign trail. He would be wise to revise that slogan. Higher education is not Bud Light. Scholars are leaving the state, taking their economic impact with them.
The coming brain drain will soon hit Florida’s rankings in US News & World Report, and then its economy. As Governor DeSantis ponders his next move in his culture war against wokeness, he should consider if the juice is worth the squeeze.
Engagement Resources
- Princeton Review: Best Colleges 2023 | College Ranking List | The Princeton Review
- US News & World Report: 2022-2023 Best Colleges | College Rankings and Data | US News Education
The Hijab in Sports
The Hijab in Sports
Foreign Policy Brief #87 | By: Reilly Fitzgerald | August 8, 2023
Photo taken from: fox4news.com
__________________________________
The hijab is an article of clothing that has sparked debate for years due to its connections to the Islamic faith for some, and for others a tie to a social and political landscape based in the Middle East. The hijab is a form of head covering that women either of Middle Eastern descent, or Islamic faith, might wear. Across the world, head coverings are used as a means to show modesty or commitment to faith or connection to a specific culture. The hijab has not gone without controversy, especially in the post-9/11 world. Many places have banned the wearing of a hijab, while hypocritically allowing other head coverings to be worn. The FIFA Women’s World Cup, ongoing in Australia and New Zealand, has just had the first ever women’s soccer player to wear a hijab in a game. The wearing of the hijab in sports has grown so much that even major sports retailers are designing sports hijabs (such as Nike and Adidas).
Analysis
Nouhaila Benzina is the first woman to ever wear a hijab while playing in the Women’s World Cup. She is a top player for the Moroccan National Team. Coincidently, French courts upheld the country-wide ban on athletes wearing the hijab while playing football (otherwise known as soccer). According to The Local France, the hijab is banned while playing soccer but is acceptable in any other public space in France. However, in 2010 a law passed that made entire full-face coverings, such as the niqab and burqa illegal to be worn in public in France. The colonial history between Morocco and France is significant and is a means of tension between North African countries and the European power. The two teams will be playing against each other on August 8th, 2023. It is also worth noting that the Moroccan men’s team was booted from the men’s World Cup last by France. The women’s team is heading into the French match-up after winning two of their three initial matches of the tournament, while the French women’s team has also won two matches and drew level against Jamaica.
Not all countries have dealt with the hijab the same as France, however. In fact, Finland’s Football Association hands out free sports hijabs to increase the diversity of the players in their country and to include people who may be otherwise excluded, according to Al Jazeera. It is interesting to note, that a Pew Research study found that out of 15 countries Finland held the most anti-Muslim sentiments out of the group. In another show of support for hijab wearing athletes, the state of Maryland passed a bill into law called the Inclusive Attire Act which allows student-athletes who wear a hijab to compete in their sport without fear of exclusion.
Nike began making athletic and sports hijabs in 2017, and other companies (Adidas, Lululemon, etc) have followed suit since then. Sports such as football (soccer), running, weight lifting, and even water sports like swimming are becoming more and more hijab friendly due to these products being made regularly. The argument for this type of athletic wear is that a traditional hijab would be impractical for sport – it would slow someone down while running, could even be a safety issue perhaps in other sports, and/or just plain uncomfortable to wear. These new hijabs are made with top-notch quality athletic fabrics and are designed for an athlete to wear in competition.
Though it is an incredible achievement for Nouhaila Benzina to be in the women’s World Cup and to wear her hijab, it must be noted that there are several other athletes before her that have worn hijabs in competition. According to an article in Rolling Stone, in 2016 at the Rio Olympics, the first women to wear a hijab and compete for the United States was fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad (she took home a bronze medal); she even has her own fashion line which includes hijabs, called Louella. Other notable athletes are Hajar Abdulfazl the captain of the Afghanistan Women’s National Team, and Kulsoom Abdullah the Pakistani weightlifter.
Engagement Resources
X Marks the Spot as Elon Musk Makes More Enemies
X Marks the Spot as Elon Musk Makes More Enemies
Technology Policy Brief #94 | By: Mindy Spatt | August 3, 2023
Photo taken from: rappler.com
__________________________________
Elon Musk’s neighbors in San Francisco are up in arms about X, and he takes on a formidable litigator with a lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
Analysis
Elon Musk’s rebranding of Twitter as X landed with a thud here in San Francisco, where he marked the event by installing an enormous glowing X on his mid-Market Street headquarters. Complaints poured in to the San Francisco Department of Building Inspections saying that the sign was unsafe and a nuisance, with flashing lights that interfered with neighbors’ sleep. It was quickly removed. Despite that, the Building Department announced that Musk would still have to pay fees for the installation and removal of the sign, both of which were unpermitted.
The move was perhaps part of a pissing match with Facebook, renamed with the shorter, punchier Meta, and its owner Mark Zuckerberg, who launched a new social media site Threads in a direct challenge to Twitter. Threads racked up over 100 million followers in its first week, and most industry analysts see it as a genuine threat to Twitter’s dominance.
Musk is also feeling challenged by a nonprofit advocacy organization that seeks to hold social media companies like X accountable for their impacts “by highlighting their failures, educating the public, and advocating action from other platforms and governments to protect our communities.”
On Monday July 30 X filed suit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in federal court. X is accusing the CCDH of using data that it didn’t legally possess to “falsely claim it had statistical support showing the platform is overwhelmed with harmful content.”
Since Musk took over Twitter in late 2022, the CCDH has been studying and publishing research on what they say is a rise in hate speech, disinformation and incitement to harm on Twitter, a view that is certainly shared by other critics of the platform.
In a June 2023 report the Center said Twitter routinely failed to act on hate speech by deleting tweets or users’ accounts, citing these examples:
“The black culture has done more damage [than] the Klan ever did”
“The Jewish Mafia wants to replace us all with brown people”
“Trannies are pedophiles”
“Diversity is a codeword for White Genocide”
“Hitler was right”, accompanied by a montage of the former dictator
Black people belong “locked in cages at the zoo”
LGBTQ+ rights activists need “IRON IN THEIR DIET. Preferably from a #AFiringSquad”
In a letter threatening suit on June 20, X cited this report in accusing
the CCDH of “making inflammatory, outrageous, and false or misleading assertions about Twitter and its operations…” Although the suit alleges misappropriation of data, the letter seems to complain of its’ absence, claiming that CCDH labeled its analysis of the content as research, “despite failing to conduct (or even attempt) anything resembling the rigorous design process, analytical procedures or peer review that a reasonable person would expect to accompany research product …”
In a response, the Center’s lawyers termed the letter “ridiculous,” and noted that rather than trying to correct the problem the company was instead relying on intimidation and threats to silence critics. They demanded that X Corp “take immediate steps to preserve all documents and other information (including any and all text messages to or from Mr. Musk…) concerning disinformation and hate speech on Twitter….”
The suit could be an arrogant overstep by Musk. For one thing, it is bringing more attention to the CCDH’s message. For another, the Center is represented by Roberta Kaplan, whose recent work on behalf of E. Jean Carroll resulted in a $5 million verdict against Donald Trump. Her many other accomplishments include defeating the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and a $26 million verdict against the white supremacists and neo-Nazis who conspired to commit racially-motivated violence in Charlottesville in 2017. She may prove a far more formidable adversary than Zuckerberg.
Engagement Resources
Toxic Twitter: How Twitter Makes Millions from Anti-LGBTQ+ Rhetoric by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, March 28, 2023CCDH, https://counterhate.com/research/toxic-twitter-anti-lgbtq/
Path for Democrats to Regain the House Runs Through New York
Path for Democrats to Regain the House Runs Through New York
Elections & Politics Policy Brief #88 | By: Ian Milden | August 3, 2023
Photo taken from: time.com
__________________________________
Democrats lost their majority in the House of Representatives in the 2022 mid-term elections. However, the small size of the Republican majority leaves Democrats with a path to re-take the House majority. This Brief will take an early look at some of the races in New York state, which has enough competitive races to affect the control of the House majority.
Analysis
Republicans shocked many pundits by only winning a four seat majority in the House of Representatives during the midterm elections. While Democrats performed well nationally in 2022, New York Democrats did not have a great performance statewide in 2022.
Incumbent Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) won her race by less than six percentage points. The closer than expected margin may have hurt Democrats chances to hold win in a few close races. Republicans won in New York’s 22nd District and 17th district by less than 3,000 votes. These districts will likely be targets for Democrats again this year. Mike Lawler flipped the 17th District by defeating former DCCC chairman Sean Patrick Maloney and Brandon Williams won the open seat vacated by John Katko (R-NY). The 22nd district is in upstate New York while the 17th district is in southern New York.
Next to the 22nd district in New York is the 19th district. The 19th district is a swing district in the Hudson Valley. Marc Molinaro (R-NY) won the open seat in 2022, which was open due to redistricting. Antonio Delgado (D-NY) won a version of this seat in 2018 and was re-elected in 2020, but he vacated the seat to become the lieutenant governor of New York. Pat Ryan (D-NY) won a special election in 2022 under the old district lines, but the redistricting process moved him to the 18th district where he now represents in Congress. Congressman Ryan remains in a competitive district and House Republicans have indicated that they will try to win his seat this fall.
There are also some competitive seats based in Long Island that Democrats will target. The third district has already gotten a ton of attention from both parties due to the scandals and subsequent indictment of newly-elected incumbent George Santos. The seat was recently held by Tom Suozzi (D-NY) who vacated the seat in 2022 to run for Governor, so it is a seat where Democrats have a recent history of winning. Santos may not be a participant in the General Election since New York Republicans are looking for ways to push him out of Congress, and Santos’ various legal problems could also complicate his ability to remain in Congress. Santos’ first quarter FEC report shows his campaign lost money due to refund requests, which suggests his reelection campaign is politically unviable. Federal prosecutors have moved rather quickly with his criminal case, so he is likely to face trial or strike a plea deal before the midterm elections.
In addition to George Santos’ seat, Democrats should also target the neighboring fourth district, where Anthony D’Esposito (R-NY) won a seat that was vacated by Kathleen Rice (D-NY). This area of Long Island has a history of voting for Democrats in recent decades at the Congressional and Presidential level. Democrats could also target the first and second districts, which are also based on Long Island, but these districts lean more towards Republicans and Democrats have not had success there recently.
One additional variable that could help Democrats gain seats is a mid-decade redistricting. This is a possibility due to a technicality in the law, and the process for drawing maps for the 2022 elections. The Independent Redistricting Commission did not take a second attempt to draw new maps, which resulted in a court-appointed special master drawing the maps after a court ruling. Democrats are arguing that the maps should be redrawn because the process determined by the law was not followed.
While New York State provides the exact number of competitive districts held by Republicans that Democrats need to win in order to gain control of the House majority, it would be a surprise if Democrats successfully flipped all five of these districts. In addition, Democrats will likely need to win additional seats outside of New York in order to get the majority since there are likely to be losses elsewhere. These Congressional Districts will be ones to keep an eye on as Democrats recruit candidates and start raising money for the 2024 general election.
Engagement Resources
DCCC Website, Official Campaign Arm of House Democrats, https://dccc.org/
The Week That Was: Global News In Review
The Week That Was: Global News In Review
Foreign Policy Brief #86 | By: Abran C | August 3, 2023
Photo taken from: fox4news.com
__________________________________
Coup in Niger
Last week Niger’s democratically elected President Mohamed Bazoum was overthrown by the country’s military leaders. The leaders of the coup have warned against any armed intervention in the country. This comes as West African leaders are set to gather for an emergency summit to discuss how to restore constitutional order to Niger. As the largest country in West Africa, it’s an important country for the region. Politically, it was seen as an example of relative democratic stability, as its neighbors in the region, Mali and Burkina Faso, have already succumbed to military coups. Strategically for the West, it hosts French and US military bases as a key partner in the fight against armed insurgents in the Sahel region. Economically, Niger is one of the poorest countries in the world, receiving close to $2 billion a year in official development assistance, but it is rich in raw materials like uranium, producing 7% of all global supplies. The US has called for president Bazoum’s immediate release. Meanwhile the African Union, the West African regional bloc Ecowas, the EU and the UN have all spoken out against the coup.
Floating border wall
Last week the United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas, calling for the removal of a floating border barrier that has raised territorial and humanitarian concerns. Mexico filed a complaint with the US government earlier this month, accusing the structure of violating border treaties signed in 1944 and 1970. The razor-wired floating border is one of the latest examples of extremist efforts by the Texas Republican governor to repel asylum seekers. The barrier is a part of Operation Lone Star, a Texas initiative launched in 2021 under Governor Abbott. It includes bussing and flying migrants and asylum seekers to predominantly Democratic cities, and deploying troops from the state National Guard and the Texas Department of Public Safety to guard the border. The number of irregular crossings from Mexico into the US has been on the decline since the ending of Title 42, a controversial COVID-era policy that allowed border officials to turn away asylum seekers without processing their claims. The floating border and other Texas policies for dealing with migrants have sparked human rights concerns, and asylum groups denounce the militarisation of the border and heavy-handed policies.
Russia writes off $23 billion debt for Africa
Russian President Vladimir Putin said last week, at the second ever Russia- Africa summit that his country has written off $23 billion of Debt for African countries. Russia also offered assistance to Africa in countering threats such as terrorism, piracy, and transnational crimes, saying it would continue to train personnel from African countries. Putin assured African leaders that Russian businesses have a lot to offer partners from Africa. Russia is now pushing harder to move closer to African nations as it looks for friends, allies, and markets to help support it against Western states opposed to its aggression in Ukraine. Moscow was a crucial player in Africa in the Soviet era, but its influence has waned heavily over the past few decades. Putin is trying to rekindle that influence and win over the countries in the global south to back him in an ever increasing polarized world.