JOBS

JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES

The Jobs and Infrastructure domain tracks and reports on policies that deal with job creation and employment, unemployment insurance and job retraining, and policies that support investments in infrastructure. This domain tracks policies emanating from the White House, the US Congress, the US Department of Labor, the US Department of Transportation, and state policies that respond to policies at the Federal level. Our Principal Analyst is Vaibhav Kumar who can be reached at vaibhav@usresistnews.org.

Latest Jobs Posts

 

Jobs01 e1489352304814
Michigan Part 3

Michigan Part 3

2020 Congressional Campaign Updates is a new feature of U.S. RESIST NEWS. Written by  reporter William Bourque, the updates will help our leaders follow key races in the House and Senate that are key to the ability of democrats to gain control of both houses of Congress.

By William Bourque

Michigan Part 3

August 19,2020

As we conclude our Targeted Districts” series in Michigan, we travel to the 10th district, currently held by Republican Paul Mitchell.  Mitchell served two terms but will not run for a third, saying that he felt frustrated by partisanship in Washington.  The Republican running to maintain control of the seat is Lisa McClain, a financial executive.  The district polls as R+13, or 13 percentage points in favor of Republican control, so we expect McClain to win her race.  Nevertheless, her democratic opponent is Kimberly Bizon, a marketing professional.  Bizon has never held a public elected office and was defeated in her previous election attempt in 2018, by almost 25 percentage points.  The seat will almost certainly remain in republican control, with McClain likely securing an easy victory.

As we move along to Michigan’s 11th district, we find Haley Stevens, a democratic incumbent.  Stevens has only served one term in the house, having been elected in 2018.   It is worth noting that Michigan’s 11th fell to Trump in the presidential election, making Stevens’ victory even more impressive.  She was elected to replace Republican David Trott, who served for two terms before announcing he wouldn’t seek reelection.  Stevens’ republican opponent is Eric Esshaki, a lawyer who also has experience as a healthcare professional.  Esshaki says he is running on traditional conservative values, citing his “pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, pro-border security, and pro-constitution” beliefs.  The Cook Political Report rates the district as “leans democrat”, and we feel inclined to agree.  Stevens will secure another term and the 11th district will continue its trend to the left.

As we move onto the 12th district we see another democratic incumbent, Representative Debbie Dingell.  Dingell has held the office since 2015, when she took over for her husband, John Dingell.  In each of her previous 2 elections, Dingell has garnered over 60% of the votes, which suggests she will have an easy path to a third term.  Nevertheless, she faces Republican Jeff Jones, who has run against Dingell in each of her previous elections.  Jones hasn’t held any prior elected office and doesn’t seem to pose a threat to Dingell, who we expect to cruise to a third term.

District 13 is home to Michigan’s most high-profile congresswoman, Rashida Tlaib.  In only her first term, Tlaib has made waves in congress, along with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar.  Tlaib recently won a close primary against Brenda Jones, someone who was heavily funded by moderates and some republicans.  Tlaib is certain to beat Republican challenger David Dudenhoefer, who doesn’t even have a chance to win in such a progressive district.  We expect Tlaib to cruise to a win and have a significant role in the democratically controlled House.

To round out Michigan we look at the heavily democratic 14th district.  The incumbent is Democrat Brenda Lawrence, who has held the seat since 2014.  One of the most progressive districts in the state, the 14th district is both majority black and majority female, so it’s only right that a black woman represents them in congress.  Lawrence will face Republican Robert Vance Patrick, who, much like his counterpart in the 13th district, doesn’t even have a chance to win.  We expect Lawrence to retain control of her district in a heavy democratic area.

The Corruption of Louis DeJoy

The Corruption of Louis DeJoy

The United States Postal Service has long been a target of Donald Trump’s attack. Since his 2015 campaign begin he has called out the post office for losing money, which is a bit like a municipality complaining about a lack of revenue from trash collection. As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, more Americans than ever are expected to cast mail-in ballots in the upcoming election. Up to 180 million people may be eligible to vote through the postal service. That does not bode well for the dwindling prospects of Trump winning reelection or maintaining a Republican majority in the Senate. In response, Trump has ramped up his attacks on the postal office and spouted repeatedly, without evidence, that mail-in voting will lead to widespread voter fraud and an illegitimate election. He has refused to sign off on the necessary funding to ensure that USPS is able to handle the increased workload until through November. In corrupt postman, Louis DeJoy, he has found the perfect lackey.

At this point it seems redundant to point out lack of qualification or conflicting interests by a Trump appointee. However, DeJoy’s are especially conspicuous. Unlike any Post Master General in two decades, DeJoy had never worked for the post office. More troubling, he owns between $30-75 million in stock of XPO, a logistics company which serves as a subcontractor of the post office. Prior to his appointment, DeJoy owned between 100-250K in Amazon (perhaps the post office’s most formidable competitor), of which he divested. However the same day he purchased between $50-100K of stock options in Amazon, that would allow him to purchase shares at roughly 2/3 of their current value. The options expire on October 16th. The Post Master General of the United States, is in essence gambling that his agency’s biggest competitor will increase in value in the next two months. Since Trump co-opted the Republican party in his image four years ago, DeJoy has donated $2.5 million to his campaigns and those of other GOP members. That, by all accounts is the extent of his involvement in government or politics.

DeJoy is deeply invested in a post office subcontractor which simultaneously represents a competitive threat to it. He’s in a position to further those interest by undermining the very office which he is assigned to manage. He was put there by a president whose campaign he donated to generously. DeJoy seeks to reap incalculable personal and financial benefit from mismanaging USPS, and subverting the 2020 election.

Under the guise of increased efficiency, DeJoy has made a series of moves which threaten to damage the post office’s function and undermine public confidence. In a Nixon-style ‘’Friday Night Massacre” on August 7th, the post master general removed or reassigned two dozen of the most senior executives at USPS. The reorganization concentrates power around DeJoy and two deputies reporting directly to him. It also sidelines decades of institutional knowledge at  time when it is at a premium.

New directives also threaten to disrupt on-time delivery for millions of Americans dependent on the mail. Per USPS’ own internal documents, 671 high speed mail sorting machines have been removed from branches all over the country. The best of these sorting machines can sort up tp 30,000 pieces of mail each day. Two technicians familiar with the machines estimated that the same work would take about 30 postal workers, with specialized training their entire shifts to complete.

Another initiative of DeJoy’s mandates that mail carriers begin their routes at a designated time, regardless of if their trucks are loaded. The inevitable result of this fundamental change will be delays, and backup in mail. Overtime benefits have also been cut for thousands of employees. The union which represents postal workers has stated publicly that they have neither met with DeJoy, or been consulted to the sweeping policy changes.

Timely delivery of mail  is especially crucial for seniors reluctant to leave home and Americans living in more rural areas. Veterans also heavily depend on Post Office services. The Veterans Affairs reports that 80% of the prescriptions filled for veterans are done so by mail. DeJoy’s disruption of  mail-in ballot efforts also affects  these important Post Office constituencies.

Donald Trump is actively trying to sabotage the national effort to vote by mail. He acknowledged as much in a recent Fox News interview about the failed coronavirus relief package. His partner in crime is his newly appointed Postmaster General.

Reform, Defund or Abolish? Different Solutions to Police Violence

Reform, Defund or Abolish? Different Solutions to Police Violence

August 13, 2020

Summary

Across the country Americans are demanding an end to police violence in their communities, with different activist groups calling for different solutions. Chief among these are reform, defund and abolish. These terms are used a lot in the media, often interchangeably, but they are actually separate and distinct points along a continuum.

Police reform refers to efforts to improve existing departments by addressing their values, policies and practices. Measures, which often translate into increased funding for departments, include requiring special training, revising old policies, making declarations and changing hiring procedures. Reformers believe police are mostly nonviolent aside from a few “bad apples.”

Defunding the police involves slashing department budgets, forcing them to downsize and minimize their operations. Defunding could be complete or partial, and some law enforcement capacity may be retained. The second part of the defunding strategy invests the money saved back into the local community in the form of infrastructure, education and social services. Proponents of defunding believe police violence is a symptom of a larger problem.

The abolitionist movement takes defunding one step further by seeking a completely new system of public safety constructed on class equality and supported by a team of “nonviolent emergency responders.” As with defunding, police budgets would go toward meeting community needs. Abolitionists believe police would be obsolete if people had more access to social services, jobs and education.

Analysis

Each of the three solutions has its supporters and detractors. Ultimately, it is up to towns and cities to decide which makes the most sense for them.

#8CantWait is a police reform campaign that lays out eight actions departments can adopt to prevent the killing of civilians. These include banning chokeholds, requiring more comprehensive reporting and requiring a duty to intervene. Many major cities have already adopted all eight policies, including Cincinnati, Denver, San Francisco, St. Louis and Tucson.

Black Lives Matter supports defunding the police, as do the American Civil Liberties Union and the Movement for Black Lives. The Seattle City Council recently voted to cut its police funding by $4 million. It is among 12 cities actively exploring defunding their police departments to some degree, including New York and Los Angeles.

Groups like Critical Resistance are pushing for abolition. The campaign #8toAbolition was created in response to the #8CantWait campaign and lays out eight steps to radically transform policing, including removing police from schools, freeing people from jails and providing housing. Minneapolis, which is at the heart of the nation’s debate on police violence, is currently hearing arguments for the abolition of its police department.

Resistance Resources

#8CantWait is a police reform campaign focusing on use of force
Black Lives Matter is a global movement defending Black lives
American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit defending human rights
Movement for Black Lives is a space for Black organizations to come together
#8toAbolition is a police abolition campaign
Critical Resistance is a police abolition group

This brief was compiled by Laura Plummer. To add your organization as a resource, contact me@lauraplummer.me.

Growing Up In the Pandemic  Youth Face Great Challenges

Growing Up In the Pandemic Youth Face Great Challenges

Rosalind Gottfried

Economics

August 9, 2020

Policy

Today young people in school or entering the job market face enormous socio-economic challenges. Their  economic and social vulnerability  is pervasive especially for those young people who lack a college degree, and particularly if they are female or nonwhite.  When job creation is reduced, as it is with the pandemic youth unemployment is the most likely to soar.

In “good times’ youths are three times more likely to be unemployed than people over 25.  In the pre-pandemic era 53 million  people were employed in low wage jobs with median incomes of $10.22 per hour.   Youths comprised 24% of these workers.  They also represent the largest group or workers laid off during the pandemic.

Youths who don’t complete college are  are also more likely, at 23%, to work in jobs considered to be at “near-term” risk in construction, manufacturing, and real estate. These jobs are less likely to provide “benefits” such as health insurance, sick leave, or parental leave.

The picture is not as bleak for college graduates.  This cohort often faces the derailment of first jobs and internships but they tend to be more resilient than their peers who lack degrees.  Some analysts believe that Gen C’s resiliency from job loss is due to some of the group returning to finish college or graduate school.

Analysis

The demand for finishing college and for graduate school attendance generally rises in poor economic times but there is a growing fear that higher education may cost more than it ultimately benefits. Effective K-12 education will also be challenging during the pandemic, especially for youth from low-income communities. Their school districts often lack the capacity to provide quality virtual learning and  students from low income communities can lack access to computers and Broadband Internet.

The pandemic also is taking its toll on the mental health of Generation C. It is estimated that one half of adolescents and youths, 18-29, have symptoms of depression.  Suicide is now the second leading cause of death in people under 35. A mental health crisis, already appearing, seems likely to worsen.

Learn More

Resistance Resources

https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/  National suicide prevention hotline website.

A Summary and Review of Netflix’s Immigration Nation

A Summary and Review of Netflix’s Immigration Nation

By Kathryn Baron

Summary

In 2017, co-directors Christina Clusiau and Shaul Schwartz began filming a six-part Netflix docuseries called Immigration Nation. The Trump Administration reportedly tried to block the use of some footage in the film as it takes on a very direct and overt portrait of the US immigration system. Time described it as “empathetic storytelling and bold investigative journalism.” Throughout the docuseries, there is an overwhelming presence of cognitive dissonance in which immigration officials perpetually carry a “just following orders” and “it’s not up to me” attitude. By presenting case studies of individuals, families, and asylum seekers, Clusiau and Schwartz envelope the heavy day to day of the US immigration system while ensuring the viewers are exposed to the cruelties and dissociation that also occurs daily. Some of the individuals in the docuseries are a father separated from his 3-year old son – and wants to know “where are the good Americans?” – migrants freezing to death in the desert on their journey, a grandmother and granddaughter who fled after MS-13 attempted to force the 12-year old granddaughter into marriage, and a Ugandan woman whose husband sent men to pour acid on her after they separated.

The docuseries opened with a case for a man to be deported and upon arrest, no warrant was presented to the family, but instead, his wife was told to just believe they had a warrant when asked but were not required to show her. While in the holding cell, officers were very condescending and took a cell-phone video in mockery of him. Throughout the docuseries, there were a plethora of micro-aggressions and jokes made among officers at immigrants’ expense. Signs on the walls read “never turn your back on a prisoner!!!!!!!!!!” In another case of “precision policing” – the specific way in which many ICE officers said they target and arrest individuals – there were many people inside of the man in question’s apartment who all were taken in as “collateral.” During the Trump Administration, privatized ICE detention centers flourished and nearly all personability was lost. One deportation officer recounted nonchalantly a story of him buying coffee and a donut from a young man who kept questioning if the officer remembered him. The officer had no idea who he was until the young man told him the officer had deported his mother just the week prior. The officer laughed this off during his storytelling and explained that he upholds an “onto the next” attitude in his work.

Lastly, Immigration Nation covered the deportation of veterans – made possible during the Clinton Administration – and “wage theft” – in which many employers refuse to pay undocumented immigrants for their work. Through these cases, Clusiau and Schwartz show how  persistent and systematic rejection wore down many immigrants and broke their spirits causing them to lose hope in the “American Dream.”

It was made abundantly clear that for some law enforcement, their job was viewed as a “manhunt” and this quality is what contributed to the thrill and satisfaction they sought when entering law enforcement. Particularly officers of the ICE Fugitive Operations branch – the deportation officers locating, arresting, and removing fugitive migrants – and Homeland Security Investigation – which pursues organized criminal activity like human, arms, and drug smuggling. When ICE was established in 2003, there were 8 units. Now, there are 129 and the Trump Administration has successfully weaponized the immigration system and more than doubled the number of arrests. When asked if it is humane, Thomas Homan – former Acting Director of ICE – replied with “I think it is the law” while averting eye contact and fidgeting for a response.  The docuseries focuses in large part on the Trump Administration but ensures the audience that Trump has exacerbated an existing issue. The acceleration the Trump Administration needed to carry out mass arrests and deportations were built upon the momentum set forth during the Bush Administration in the post-9/11 era that weaponized and instilled fear in the American public re foreigners. The system is discouraging by design as a conscious strategy of prevention-through-deterrence is employed in a dismissive and detached manner. Regardless of growing global opposition, the Trump Administration does not recoil and instead creates physical and legal barriers.

Resistance  Resources

  • The National Immigration Law Center: an organization that exclusively dedicates itself to defending and furthering the rights of low income immigrants and strives to educate decision makers on the impacts and effects of their policies on this overlooked part of the population.
  • Border Network for Human Rights: network to engage education, organization and participation of border communities to defend human rights and work towards a society where everyone is equal in rights and dignity.
  • The ACLU: a non-profit with a longstanding commitment to preserving and protecting the individual rights and liberties the Constitution and US laws guarantee all its citizens. You can also donate monthly to counter Trump’s attacks on people’s rights. Recently, the ACLU has filed a lawsuit challenging the separation of families at the border.
  • Center for Disease Control: the CDC provides updated information surrounding COVID-19 and the US responses
The Coronavirus Child Care And Education Relief Act

The Coronavirus Child Care And Education Relief Act

By Emily Carty

August 13, 2020

The Coronavirus Child Care and Education Relief Act (CCCERA) is a $430 billion bill proposed on June 30 by Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) in response to the COVID-19 impact on schools and their communities. The bill, a product of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), clarifies and adds to the CARES Act which was enacted in late March. Though the bill was introduced just over a month ago it remains a proposal and lawmakers have yet to finalize a package for schools, despite the nearing start date.

The bill sets aside $345 billion for education in general, with a little over half going to K-12 schools. Specifically, the bill aims to: direct money to education agencies with more students from low-income families; set aside money for migrant and homeless children and English language learners; increase “liquidity and cash flow” to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) so they can tap into their assets. CCCERA goes further to protect educators, students, and school communities from state budget cuts by requiring that states receiving federal funds maintain or increase state education spending for three years. The bill contains several other points, but generally aims to enact a robust and equitable funding plan meant to tackle the gap in education and technology access for our most vulnerable students and families.

In addition to a greater sum of aid and more thoughtful allocation, the bill condemns Education Secretary DeVos’ implementation efforts to limit aid eligibility for Dreamers and undocumented students and repeals the Secretary’s discretionary spending fund, a percentage of aid to be spent at her discretion under laws written into the CARES Act. In May DeVos distributed over $350 million from the fund to small, private, primarily religious universities whose typically smaller and wealthier student bodies would receive more money per student than universities with more low-income students. She also distributed $180 million in grants for states, with the “absolute priority 1” being the creation of “microgrants” which could pay for technology and services to support remote learning —  but could also be used for private school tuition. Both of these inequitable allocations are remedied in CCCERA which solidifies how money can be spent across the public and private sector and provides an updated formula that places more weight on the headcount of low-income students in a given school. 

Policy Analysis:

As the nation is gearing up for the school year lawmakers have yet to strike a deal on a stimulus package that will not only help the economy, which seems to be their main priority, but also address the inequities in education that have been exasperated by the current public health crisis. Not all families will be able to support remote learning at home or have access to or money for technology required for effective remote learning, and that is just the tip of the iceberg. Nevertheless, Republicans and Democrats have been going back and forth for months on an all-inclusive proposal while our youth and school communities have been waiting for answers.

CCCERA policies, supported by advocacy groups, educational agencies, professional organizations, and families, provide much needed funding and spending clarifications which address the multiple levels of inequities in our education system. This bill shows that legislators are hearing what the people have been demanding and continue to demand — an educational system that is built to help everyone succeed. The bill also recognizes the people’s calls for transparency and accountability in government, as it seeks to remedy DeVos’ violation of “Congressional intent” when implementing the CARES Act. Instead of “equitable services” for private schools, she gave large grants to private institutions and required that a greater percentage of federal aid goes to private schools than what is normal under the law by counting all students instead of just low-income students — this was not what was intended by the law as equitable and is an abuse of power. Only by bringing accountability and transparency to the forefront and closing these loopholes can lawmakers prevent further misuse of funds and ensure that students’ rights to quality and accessible education are not trampled on.

S.4112 goes above and beyond the stimulus proposals currently being debated. However its passage is by no means assured. For S.4112 to become a law lawmakers from both parties must treat education, especially public education, as a nonpartisan priority. It has been referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions for additional review, but even if it is forwarded to the Republican Majority Senate for a vote, chances of it moving on to the House are slim. Nor is it likely to be signed by the President — who before COVID was planning on cutting the education budget by about 8% for the next fiscal year. Since the stimulus package as an all-in-one deal is taking the stage, schools and students must patiently wait in hopes that democrats will negotiate for more and equitable funding for schools.

Resistance Resources:

NASSP — The National Association of Secondary School Principals has an action page with education justice issues and a convenient fill-in template that sends emails to your local elected representatives. It also has tools that help you register to vote, find relevant elected officials, and prepare you to vote on relevant educational policies.

NEA EdJustice — The National Education Association’s EdJustice site provides information and resources for addressing injustices in education, including relevant petitions, pledges, and events. Join their “League” to connect with other advocates and organize in your community.

Educators for Excellence — Educators for Excellence connects Educators and school communities with tools to advocate for progressive policies that will help under-resourced schools and students have better access to and quality of education. They have templates, contact info, and links to help you reach out to the appropriate governing bodies and demand justice.

Healthy Schools — Healthy Schools is a 501(c)3 that partners with the CDC and EPA to provide expert advice and action plans to school leaders and governments in order to create healthy and safe schools. They’ve created an extensive plan and action tool-kit to address the pandemic, check out their resources for organizing and assisting in its implementation in your local schools.

Sources:

Twitter and the Ayatollah

Twitter and the Ayatollah

Amy Swain

August 10, 2020

Summary

Censorship of politicians has become a hot topic as of late, specifically concerning Twitter vs Trump. The president’s cherished platform began censoring him after his tweets concerning Black Lives Matter protests seemed to incite violence. Now, however, Twitter is facing backlash for its seemingly selective policies on political statements.

Several tweets from Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei have been brought forward of evidence of this. A post of his from May 21 read “The only remedy until the removal of the Zionist regime is firm, armed resistance.” The tweet, among others, echoed some of Trump’s. This encouraged Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Orit Farkash-Hacohen to send a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey requesting Khamenei be banned from the platform. Twitter offered a response letter explaining why they would not be complying with the request, including their commitment to serving the public conversation.

Their denial prompted discussion of the company’s policies at a recent hearing of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament in Jerusalem on July 29. Human rights attorney Arsen Ostrovsky asked Twitter’s Ylwa Pettersson: “You have recently started flagging the tweets of President Trump. Why have you not flagged the tweets of Iran’s Ayatollah Khameini, who has literally called for the genocide of Israel and the Jewish people?” Pettersson responded that the two situations are not the same, citing portions of the letter previously sent on this topic and stating “Presently, our policies with regards to world leaders state that direct interactions with fellow public figures, comments on current affairs, or strident statements of foreign policy on economic or military issues are generally not in violation of the Twitter rules.”

Analysis

Iran’s Khamemei has posted many questionable statements on his social media platform, including those denying the holocaust as well as likening Israel to Covid-19 as a virus and cancerous growth, utilizing the hashtag #covid1948 to reference the year the Jewish state was established. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has referred to the Ayatollah’s sentiment as “echoing Hitler’s call for genocide.” Ted Cruz has called for a criminal investigation for Twitter’s allowance of Iranian officials to use the platform at all.

Twitter maintains that they censor tweets containing “targeted harassment,” and that these statements do not fall under that umbrella. The Ayatollah did post, during his prolific month of scandalous tweets, that his call for the end of Zionism is not a call for the elimination of the Jewish people, affirming that Jewish people have lived peacefully in Iran for many years. However, the style of veiled aggression in choice words resonates with many, particularly in Israel, the same way anti-BLM sentiment has with Americans in favor of social justice.

Twitter has pointed to its policy on world leaders as a blanket response to inquiries on the subject, “Blocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial Tweets would hide important information people should be able to see and debate.” It is not hard to see the merit in that argument – if a world leader would like the public to be aware of a hateful agenda, should that public be denied the ability to see that side of said leader? The issue lies in the creation of several lines concerning the role and responsibility of social media companies, particularly U.S. based companies, within politics, foreign and domestic. Only time will tell whether those lines will be clearly drawn, and for whose benefit.

Resources

Bill S.4112

Bill S.4112

The Coronavirus Child Care and Education Relief Act (CCCERA) is a $430 billion bill proposed on June 30 by Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) in response to the COVID-19 impact on schools and their communities. The bill, a product of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), clarifies and adds to the CARES Act which was enacted in late March. Though the bill was introduced just over a month ago it remains a proposal and lawmakers have yet to finalize a package for schools, despite the nearing start date.

The bill sets aside $345 billion for education in general, with a little over half going to K-12 schools. Specifically, the bill aims to: direct money to education agencies with more students from low-income families; set aside money for migrant and homeless children and English language learners; increase “liquidity and cash flow” to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) so they can tap into their assets. CCCERA goes further to protect educators, students, and school communities from state budget cuts by requiring that states receiving federal funds maintain or increase state education spending for three years. The bill contains several other points, but generally aims to enact a robust and equitable funding plan meant to tackle the gap in education and technology access for our most vulnerable students and families.

In addition to a greater sum of aid and more thoughtful allocation, the bill condemns Education Secretary DeVos’ implementation efforts to limit aid eligibility for Dreamers and undocumented students and repeals the Secretary’s discretionary spending fund, a percentage of aid to be spent at her discretion under laws written into the CARES Act. In May DeVos distributed over $350 million from the fund to small, private, primarily religious universities whose typically smaller and wealthier student bodies would receive more money per student than universities with more low-income students. She also distributed $180 million in grants for states, with the “absolute priority 1” being the creation of “microgrants” which could pay for technology and services to support remote learning —  but could also be used for private school tuition. Both of these inequitable allocations are remedied in CCCERA which solidifies how money can be spent across the public and private sector and provides an updated formula that places more weight on the headcount of low-income students in a given school.

Policy Analysis:

As the nation is gearing up for the school year lawmakers have yet to strike a deal on a stimulus package that will not only help the economy, which seems to be their main priority, but also address the inequities in education that have been exasperated by the current public health crisis. Not all families will be able to support remote learning at home or have access to or money for technology required for effective remote learning, and that is just the tip of the iceberg. Nevertheless, Republicans and Democrats have been going back and forth for months on an all-inclusive proposal while our youth and school communities have been waiting for answers.

CCCERA policies, supported by advocacy groups, educational agencies, professional organizations, and families, provide much needed funding and spending clarifications which address the multiple levels of inequities in our education system. This bill shows that legislators are hearing what the people have been demanding and continue to demand — an educational system that is built to help everyone succeed. The bill also recognizes the people’s calls for transparency and accountability in government, as it seeks to remedy DeVos’ violation of “Congressional intent” when implementing the CARES Act. Instead of “equitable services” for private schools, she gave large grants to private institutions and required that a greater percentage of federal aid goes to private schools than what is normal under the law by counting all students instead of just low-income students — this was not what was intended by the law as equitable and is an abuse of power. Only by bringing accountability and transparency to the forefront and closing these loopholes can lawmakers prevent further misuse of funds and ensure that students’ rights to quality and accessible education are not trampled on.

S.4112 goes above and beyond the stimulus proposals currently being debated. However its passage is by no means assured. For S.4112 to become a law lawmakers from both parties must treat education, especially public education, as a nonpartisan priority. It has been referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions for additional review, but even if it is forwarded to the Republican Majority Senate for a vote, chances of it moving on to the House are slim. Nor is it likely to be signed by the President — who before COVID was planning on cutting the education budget by about 8% for the next fiscal year. Since the stimulus package as an all-in-one deal is taking the stage, schools and students must patiently wait in hopes that democrats will negotiate for more and equitable funding for schools. 

Resistance Resources: 

NASSP — The National Association of Secondary School Principals has an action page with education justice issues and a convenient fill-in template that sends emails to your local elected representatives. It also has tools that help you register to vote, find relevant elected officials, and prepare you to vote on relevant educational policies.

NEA EdJustice — The National Education Association’s EdJustice site provides information and resources for addressing injustices in education, including relevant petitions, pledges, and events. Join their “League” to connect with other advocates and organize in your community.

Educators for Excellence — Educators for Excellence connects Educators and school communities with tools to advocate for progressive policies that will help under-resourced schools and students have better access to and quality of education. They have templates, contact info, and links to help you reach out to the appropriate governing bodies and demand justice.

Healthy Schools — Healthy Schools is a 501(c)3 that partners with the CDC and EPA to provide expert advice and action plans to school leaders and governments in order to create healthy and safe schools. They’ve created an extensive plan and action tool-kit to address the pandemic, check out their resources for organizing and assisting in its implementation in your local schools.

Sources:

Michigan Part 2

Michigan Part 2

Congressional Campaign Updates  is a new feature of U.S. RESIST NEWS. Written by  reporter William Bourque.  The updates will help our readers follow key races in the House and Senate that are key to the ability of democrats to gain control of both houses of Congress.

Michigan Part 2

August 7, 2020

            We continue our review of Michigan’s congressional races by moving onto District 6, where once again a republican is the incumbent.  The district’s most notable area is the city of Kalamazoo, but also includes rural areas in the southwest corner of the state.  Incumbent Fred Upton has held the seat for over 30 years, initially elected in the autumn of 1986.  His views, much like the republican party, have increasingly shifted right, and he has voted with President Trump on most issues this term.  His opponent is yet to be decided, but Jon Hoadley, a former member of the state House of Representatives, seems to be the more likely nominee.  A poll from Victoria Research on May 11 shows Hoadley with a 1 point lead, proving that if he can win the nomination that Upton will have a fight to the bitter end on his hands.  Expect this election to come down to the wire and don’t be surprised if the democrats pull an upset on Upton Michigan’s 7th district is another tight district that is currently held by a Republican that has a chance to be a close race in November.  Incumbent Tim Walberg was initially elected to the seat in 2006 but was defeated after just one term, in 2008.  However, in 2010, Walberg ran to take back the seat and has controlled it ever since.  Walberg’s margain  of victory has slowly waned and democrat Gretchen Driskell came within 7 points of him in 2018, and she hopes to close that gap even further in the coming months.  Driskell is the former mayor of Saline, MI, as well as a representative in the Michigan House of Rep for district 52.  On her campaign website, Driskell totes her success as mayor, specifically having a balanced budget for every year she was in office, which may forecast success if elected to Congress.  We believe that Driskell may have what it takes to win, and another seat could flip to the left.

Michigan’s 8th district is currently held by democrat Elissa Slotkin, and we expect that she will win re-election, albeit in a very close race.  The district covers the state capital of Lansing, as well as the notable city of East Lansing, home to the Michigan State Spartans.  Slotkin was first elected in 2018, where she unseated incumbent republican Mike Bishop by a margin of about 13,000 votes.  Slotkin has been a loyal democrat in Congress, importantly voting for both articles of impeachment.  Her opponent is yet to be decided, with a republican primary to be run on August 4th.  The frontrunner in campaign funding is Alan Hoover, a republican, who is presumed to be leading the polls.  Time will tell, but we forecast a clear path to a second term for Slotkin.

In the 9th district we see another democratic incumbent, one term representative Andy Levin.  Andy’s father and uncle are both prominent politicians, with his father having held the seat he now holds since 1983.  Levin comfortably won his initial election in 2018, and it seems that he shouldn’t have much trouble getting re-elected.  His opponent is republican Charles Langworthy, who hasn’t held any prior elected office.  Langworthy is a supporter of President Trump, which won’t make him popular in this democratic portion of Michigan.  Levin winning re-election should be a breeze, and we expect to see him back in the House for another term.

Calls to Defund LAPD Increase Amid Growing Gang Database Scandal

Calls to Defund LAPD Increase Amid Growing Gang Database Scandal

August 7, 2020

Summary:

On July 10, three Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers were charged with felonies when an internal investigation revealed they knowingly documented dozens of innocent people as gang affiliates in 2018. The complaint shows how Michael Coblentz, Nicolas Martinez and Braxton Shaw falsified Field Identification (FI) Cards used to conduct interviews during stops. An untold number of these were then entered into the state’s gang database, CalGang. The officers could have been motivated by a department policy that hinges performance reviews on interaction with gang affiliates.

In LA, participation in a gang is a punishable offense. Furthermore, if a person commits a crime, he can be subjected to a harsher sentence if he is documented as a gang member. Depending on the judge, a gang label can mean the difference between probation or jail. The LAPD is the state’s largest police department and the biggest contributor to CalGang, responsible for about a quarter of all entries. But on July 14, the California attorney general made it impossible for the LAPD to access the database except to remove individuals from it.

With the officers’ credibility challenged, the District Attorney’s office announced that it contacted over 750 defendants in criminal cases that the officers participated in since 2002. Convictions in these cases, from drug offenses to homicide, could be overturned if the officers provided crucial testimony or evidence. In addition, the LAPD announced it was investigating over 20 other officers for suspected falsification of FI cards, with potential victims numbering in the thousands. Lawsuits against the department have already been filed, with many more expected to come.

Analysis:

It is impossible to overstate the racial implications of this scandal. Because Black people are stopped by police at a higher rate than other races, we know that the majority of those mislabeled as gang associates on FI cards were likely Black. Unfortunately, once charged with a crime, Black people also suffer disproportionately in every phase of the criminal justice system. They are statistically less likely to be able to afford private counsel and more likely to accept harmful plea deals.

Mislabeling individuals impacts the wider community as well. CalGang describes its database as a source of “accurate gang-related intelligence.” The more people added to it, the more funding and resources the LAPD can demand for its Gang Division. When numbers are artificially inflated, it paints an inaccurate picture of gang activity in the city and exposes communities to more violent and heavy-handed police tactics.

The LAPD was already in hot water, with residents and activists calling for defunding the department. Now that call is even louder. Black Lives Matter Los Angeles is energized. Its People’s Budget LA coalition is proposing significant change to the city’s police budget and demanding city leaders focus on “care not cops”. Additionally, a Change.org petition wants LAPD funding to go toward improving infrastructure, education and social services.

Resistance Resources:

People’s Budget LA, a coalition led by Black Lives Matter-Los Angeles
Black Lives Matter Los Angeles, a local chapter of the global Black Lives Matter movement
Change.org petition to defund the LAPD

This brief was compiled by Laura Plummer. If you have comments or want to add your organization to this brief, please contact me@lauraplummer.me

x
x
Support fearless journalism! Your contribution, big or small, dismantles corruption and sparks meaningful change. As an independent outlet, we rely on readers like you to champion the cause of transparent and accountable governance. Every donation fuels our mission for insightful policy reporting, a cornerstone for informed citizenship. Help safeguard democracy from tyrants—donate today. Your generosity fosters hope for a just and equitable society.

Pin It on Pinterest