JOBS

JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES

The Jobs and Infrastructure domain tracks and reports on policies that deal with job creation and employment, unemployment insurance and job retraining, and policies that support investments in infrastructure. This domain tracks policies emanating from the White House, the US Congress, the US Department of Labor, the US Department of Transportation, and state policies that respond to policies at the Federal level. Our Principal Analyst is Vaibhav Kumar who can be reached at vaibhav@usresistnews.org.

Latest Jobs Posts

 

Checking in on 14 Years of Obamacare: Part 2

Policy Brief #172 – Health and Gender
by: Geoffrey Small

This article examines the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on Medicaid expansion across states. Despite the ACA’s goal to make health insurance more accessible and to encourage Medicaid expansion, some states have resisted, leading to ongoing debates and policy changes regarding healthcare coverage and access.

read more

Ukraine: Over Two Years of War

Brief #131 – Foreign Policy Brief
by: Abran C

The two-year anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is marked by ongoing conflict, with G7 leaders reaffirming support for Ukraine while President Putin extends his reign and vows to advance further. Despite international condemnation and support for Ukraine, the war continues, resulting in significant casualties and displacement, while geopolitical tensions escalate in a broader global conflict landscape.

read more

Teen Pornographers and Trump’s Black Friends: Can Deepfakes Be Controlled?

Brief #109 – Technology Policy Brief
by : Mindy Spatt

Regulators worldwide are grappling with the proliferation of AI-generated deepfakes, which pose significant threats ranging from election manipulation to the spread of explicit content targeting minors. While some legislative efforts have been initiated, concerns persist over the effectiveness of voluntary regulations and the need for comprehensive legal measures to address the emotional and reputational harm caused by deepfakes.

read more

El Salvador’s President Addresses His Country’s Gang Problem

Brief #129 – Foreign Policy Brief
by: Abigail Hunt

El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele tackles the nation’s gang crisis with a prolonged anti-gang emergency decree, which has significantly reduced murders. However, concerns arise over human rights violations and discriminatory policies targeting indigenous communities, raising questions about the president’s approach and ambitions beyond El Salvador’s borders.

read more
Jobs01 e1489352304814
Carefree Use of Groundwater Is Making Us Thirsty

Carefree Use of Groundwater Is Making Us Thirsty

Carefree Use of Groundwater Is Making Us Thirsty

Environment Policy Brief #164 | By: Todd J. Broadman | January 30, 2024
Photo taken from: www.popularmechanics.com

__________________________________

Summary

There is a depletion of groundwater in the U.S. Much of the reason has to do with industrial scale agriculture used to grow crops that feed animals. A primary culprit is alfalfa. Alfalfa is a legume and is preferred by beef cattle producers because beef cattle raised on alfalfa hay get bigger faster, and dairy cows fed alfalfa produce more milk. Alfalfa contains more than 1,800 pounds of protein per acre on an annual basis and as a result is the top cash crop in many states. Farmers can’t get enough of this “high quality forage.” That high protein content requires copious amounts of water to grow; alfalfa ranks as one of the most water-intensive crops, requiring about 1,630,000 gallons of water per acre. On average, that’s equivalent to annual water use for 10 residential homes. Over 6 million acres of American farmland is dedicated to growing water-hungry alfalfa.

Furthermore, there is a direct line connection between alfalfa, dairy cows, and the American diet. In addition to demand for beef, increasingly, chicken is preferred – and the consumer demand for cheese has skyrocketed as well. Cheese consumption has nearly doubled over the last few decades, driven by the popularity of cheese covered pizza. In 2023, the average consumer tipped the scales, consuming over 100 pounds of chicken, a doubling in proportions, similar to the increase in cheese consumption. (The Eat-Lancet Commission recommends the optimal diet ought to be closer to one quarter of those amounts).

According to Brian Richter, president of Sustainable Waters, crops grown for cattle feed are the “greatest consumer of river water in the western United States.” One telling statistic is that 55 percent of water in the Colorado River Basin is used to grow feed crops including alfalfa, grass hay, and corn. Meanwhile, almost 80 percent of monitoring wells hit record lows in the past decade.

This is why in states like Nevada, alfalfa is the state’s top cash crop, while in Arkansas it is soybeans – to feed the billion or so chickens in that region of the country. As with alfalfa, the soy crop too, is largely dependent upon water from depleted aquifers. The amount of irrigated acreage dedicated to soybean production, mostly used for animals, has seen an 800 percent increase over the last 5 decades. And then there is the water required for corn, about half of which also goes toward animal feed, whose acreage has gone up 600 percent over the same period.

Arizona is typical of many western states in that there are no legal limits to use of groundwater, a finite resource. This availability of groundwater has led foreign investors (Saudi Arabia figures prominently in Arizona) to purchase land in unregulated states and grow crops like alfalfa in an otherwise arid desert – and then ship the crop home to feed cattle. For these reasons, in the absence of federal regulations on aquifer use, states are now creating rules where little or no regulation existed. There are more calls to decrease alfalfa production in western states that depend on the Colorado River. This is an uphill battle though, as is the case in traditional farming cultures, the value of freedom to: choose crops planted based on economics as well as respond to consumer demand.

Analysis

In the face of the looming water shortage, we have a western farming culture that focuses on the immediate short-term economics and  freedom of choice for the American consumer. California farmer Ronnie Leimgruber reflects that culture when he states that “the reason I grow alfalfa is because it’s the most profitable crop that I can grow, because that’s what people want to buy.” Environmental concerns are not on his radar. “If they wanted to buy more lettuce or more onions or more tomatoes,” he poses, “I would grow up for them — if it was more profit. But currently, people like eating pizzas. They like eating beef. They like eating Happy Meals at McDonald’s. They like eating cheese quesadillas. And I produce the feedstock that feeds the cattle that makes all those products.”

The environmental reality though, is that each pound of cheese produced requires, on average, 10 pounds of milk. And the cows producing that milk need to eat high-protein foods that require vast quantities of water, like alfalfa.

Farmers grow alfalfa because it is very profitable – selling for a high of $320 per ton in 2022, up from $210 the year before, making it more lucrative than other large-scale crops like wheat. With sufficient water, alfalfa can be harvested up to 10 times a year. It provides nutritious and healthy feed for cattle and dairy cows, which means there’s significant demand for it both in the United States and overseas in regions such as the Middle East and Asia.

Fortunately, there are those, like Brian E. Olmstead, who serves on Idaho’s Water Resource Board and issues a cautionary message: “Everybody thought, this was such a huge resource, we can’t ever deplete it.” Major global dairy food producers like Glanbia of Ireland, Lactalis of France and Agropur of Canada all operate large processing plants in western states. Glanbia alone has four plants in Idaho, which use 4.3 billion pounds of milk a year. They are aware of the significant toll their production exacts on water resources. Exports of alfalfa and other hay types also play a significant role in water usage; almost 20% of alfalfa was exported in 2021, and most of that to China. They are paying top dollar to U.S. producers to support their growing domestic dairy industry.

Speaking out on behalf of our aquifers are people like Gerald McKenna, on the board of the Desert Water Agency in Palm Springs, California. He states bluntly that, “We can do one simple thing and our water supply crisis will be over. We can stop growing alfalfa.” His declaration is sensible, “It seems to me to be just crazy to be growing that water-thirsty product in one of the driest places in the country. And yet that’s what we do.” Like McKenna, Aaron Smith, an agricultural economist at UC-Davis, also speaks for the environment over industry pressures: “From a pure resources perspective, it’s inefficient to grow plants, then feed those to animals and have animals use that energy and then we eat that energy. It would be more efficient to directly eat plants but the problem is, they don’t taste as good.”

When it comes to groundwater depletion, short-term economics and corporate profits are ushered along without much caution or environmental guardrails. In that respect, U.S. aquifers are viewed much like carbon reserves – there for the taking. The hard tradeoffs and sacrifices are right around the corner. That’s when corporate profits dry up along with flow of water.

Engagement Resources:
  • https://foodprint.org is dedicated to research and education on food production practices. Their aim is to pull back the curtain on the impacts of industrial food production practices.
  • https://grist.org  is dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Their goal is to use the power of storytelling to illuminate the way toward a better world.
  • https://www.alfalfa.org is an umbrella organization of state and regional alfalfa seed and alfalfa hay associations, genetic suppliers, seed marketers, and allied industry members dedicated to promoting the interests of the nation’s alfalfa.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today. Your support matters – we depend on readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism!

Journalism Rights Should Matter Like Other Human Rights

Journalism Rights Should Matter Like Other Human Rights

Journalism Rights Should Matter Like Other Human Rights

Social Justice Policy Brief #154 | By: Diing Magot | January 30, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.cl.usembassy.gov

__________________________________

The author is a new U.S. RESIST NEWS Reporter who comes from South Sudan (South Sudanese) , has spent time covering stories in South Sudan and Kenya, and now resides in the US. This Brief in part is a reflection of her time spent in covering news in all 3 countries.

Summary

Journalism is currently under threat, in today’s world people are still confused about the role of a journalist in a democratic society. Professional journalists at present face threats while doing their job of uncovering the truth. Access to information is a challenge and journalists continuously work in an environment that can lead to being harassed threatened, jailed or even killed. According to a report by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), last year more than 300 journalists around the world have been imprisoned because of their work.

CPJ also reports that in 66 cases, those held have not yet been told of the charges they are facing. They often face gratuitously cruel conditions, due process is frequently subverted as authorities prolong pre-charge and pre-trial detention of journalists, and journalists’ lawyers themselves face retaliation around the world.

Analysis

A journalist is someone whose career includes research that leads to investigating, searching for contacts, interviewing sources and producing all the facts, and then reporting it as news through a medium such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television and the internet.

In Kenya, Article 33 protects and entrenches the Freedom of Expression in all its manifestations, including the freedom to seek, receive or impart information or ideas, including artistic creativity, academic and scientific research, but with limited exceptions to propaganda for war, incitement to violence; hate speech or advocacy of hatred.

When I was growing up, I always wanted to be a part of the change in society. I started my journalism career as a print news intern at Kenya News Agency in Nairobi, Kenya. Working in the media is interesting because you get to work with experienced journalists, writers, and editors.

I also interned at Royal Media Services , Citizen Television. This organization was  a bigger media house. It had a television station, digital media and a radio station that has local dialects from Kenya. When I was an intern at Citizen TV ,  I was star struck when I met the news anchors that were on television. I loved working in the media it made me learn something new every day about people. As a journalist you need to have tough skin when you are in the media otherwise you will not survive. Everyone is very ruthless and wants to be on top. When you write a lot of negative news such as rape, murder, lynching, corruption, protests, it can make you lose trust in people.

But when you see your byline it is very satisfying to see your story published. When I was in South Sudan the media field was different. Article 24 of the Interim Constitution of South Sudan 2011 talks of freedom of expression but with a limit. I was a member of a journalists group there,  and we were usually amongst the first people to know when a story broke. However,  sometimes the editor needed to decide whether the story was newsworthy before it was published. If the story incited violence or hate speech, or had the possibility of bringing defamation charges,  it was killed.

You are always learning something new because everybody has a different life experience and stories. You will do a lot of research to have an idea of what you are about to write. If you are the editor, you are the agenda setter , you get to decide which stories will make the headlines and get people talking. As a  journalist, you will network with many people especially during press briefings. You meet journalists from other organizations and when you write someone’s story you are always making new connections.

In America, I have noticed journalism is different, very fast, and there are many organizations that sell news. It is more commercial and each state has their own news so it is easy to not know what is going on in other states if I do not follow up on the re-cap of nationwide news. The news is technologically advanced and AI is being introduced to news. There sometimes is a mistrust in news when it comes to disinformation especially now that elections are coming up.

Engagement Resources
  • National Press Club – There are many organizations that has supported me as a journalist support journalists such as the National Press Club, which is the meeting place in Washington DC for newsmakers and journalists. It serves its members through professional development activities that strengthens their skills.
  • Committee to Protect Journalists – The Committee to Protect Journalists is an independent, nonprofit organization that promotes press freedom worldwide. The defend the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal and provides financial and psychological support as well.
  • IJNET – International journalists network delivers the latest on global media innovation, news apps and tools, training opportunities and expert advice for professional and emerging journalists worldwide.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

A Closer Look at US Global Leadership: Navigating the Complex Dynamics of Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

A Closer Look at US Global Leadership: Navigating the Complex Dynamics of Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

A Closer Look at US Global Leadership: Navigating the Complex Dynamics of Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

Foreign Policy Brief #116 | By: Inijah Quadri | January 29, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.theguardian.com

__________________________________

In an era of evolving geopolitical landscapes, the United States faces the challenge of exerting effective global leadership amidst complex international conflicts and tensions. Three prominent areas of concern include the situations in Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan. Each region presents unique challenges that test U.S. foreign policy principles, strategic interests, and its commitment to global stability. These situations require nuanced approaches, balancing the pursuit of peace, respect for national sovereignty, and the need to uphold international law.

Analysis

a. Ukraine: The U.S.’s support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia demonstrates a strong commitment to European security and the principles of national sovereignty. This involvement, marked by substantial military aid to Ukraine and sanctions against Russia, not only underscores the long-term impact of U.S. foreign policy on European stability but also influences Russia’s international stance. While this support is a significant factor in the ongoing conflict, it also brings into question the extent and implications of U.S. involvement, especially in terms of potential escalation and destabilization within the broader European region. Such a scenario could lead to shifts in military and economic alliances across Europe.

Nevertheless, the current approach aligns with the success seen in historical contexts, such as U.S. support in the Balkans during the 1990s, which helped to stabilize the region post-conflict. However, in this instance, the US was instrumental in helping to broker a peace deal. Continuing with existing support, the U.S. should likewise bolster diplomatic efforts through platforms like the United Nations, NATO, and possibly BRICS, to seek a peaceful resolution, mirroring successful diplomatic engagements like the Dayton Agreement.

It is worth noting that the U.S.’s stance on Ukraine is deeply intertwined with its domestic politics. Notably, the MAGA Republicans have shown reluctance to support further funding for Ukraine, tying their approval to demands for stricter immigration policies. This standoff reflects a broader political divide within the U.S., where foreign policy objectives are increasingly used as leverage in domestic policy negotiations. Such internal conflicts not only complicate the U.S.’s commitment to Ukraine but also send mixed signals to international allies and adversaries alike.

b. Gaza: The Gaza Strip’s situation, exacerbated by the Israel-Palestine conflict, presents a different challenge. In the context of Israel and Gaza, President Biden faces pressure from progressive Democrats urging a more balanced approach towards the Israel-Palestine conflict. This faction advocates for greater support of Palestinian rights, posing a challenge to the traditional U.S. foreign policy that heavily favors Israel. While the situation in Gaza is particularly dire, with frequent humanitarian crises, the U.S. has historically been a staunch ally of Israel. Yet it faces calls to address the humanitarian needs in Gaza and promote a just solution to the conflict.

To avoid being labeled as two-faced, this necessitates a careful balance of U.S. foreign policy. Biden’s navigation of these internal pressures is also delicate, as he must balance progressive demands with the potential backlash from a significant domestic Jewish constituency, which traditionally influences U.S. policy in the region.

Here, the U.S. has the opportunity to play a constructive role by increasing humanitarian aid and facilitating dialogue. Learning from the success of the Oslo Accords in the 1990s, in which the U.S. played a pivotal role in mediating, similar diplomatic efforts could be employed to rejuvenate peace talks. The U.S. can leverage its influence to support UN resolutions that focus on alleviating the crisis and promoting a two-state solution.

c. Taiwan: Taiwan’s situation involves the U.S.’s strategic interests in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly the island’s role as a major chip manufacturer. This economic interdependence complicates the U.S.’s role in the region. While supporting Taiwan’s defense capabilities is crucial for maintaining regional stability and securing U.S. economic interests, any significant shift in policy could have domestic economic repercussions. Additionally, the U.S. must consider the broader impact on its relationship with China, a key player in global economics and politics.

The U.S. follows a policy of strategic ambiguity towards Taiwan, supporting its defense capabilities while not formally recognizing it as an independent state. This stance aims to deter Chinese aggression without provoking a direct conflict. The potential risks of the U.S.’s strategic ambiguity towards Taiwan include misinterpretation by China, possibly leading to miscalculations or unintended escalations. In the current global political climate, this approach risks alienating regional players who seek clear commitments. Thus, while maintaining a balance, the U.S. must be cautious to ensure its policy does not inadvertently escalate tensions or create strategic vulnerabilities.

The U.S. policy of strategic ambiguity, while supporting Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities, is a measured approach to maintaining regional stability. This stance is reminiscent of the U.S.’s Cold War policies, which effectively deterred conflicts through strategic ambiguity. Enhancing diplomatic efforts to reduce cross-strait tensions and encouraging China’s peaceful rise are vital. The U.S. can advocate for Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, drawing on the successful precedent of U.S. support for China’s WTO entry, which facilitated more engagement in global affairs.

The U.S. approach in these regions reflects a balancing act between moral imperatives, strategic interests, and international norms. The effectiveness of U.S. policies in these complex scenarios is a subject of ongoing debate, highlighting the challenges of contemporary global leadership. In each scenario, however, it remains imperative that the U.S. navigate its web of internal pressures and interests while striving to maintain its global leadership role and adhere to its foreign policy principles.

Engagement Resources

  • Council on Foreign Relations (https://www.cfr.org/): Provides in-depth analysis of global issues, including U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan.
  • United States Institute of Peace (https://www.usip.org/): Offers resources on conflict resolution and peacebuilding, relevant to the situations in Ukraine and Gaza.
  • Brookings Institution (https://www.brookings.edu/): Conducts research on U.S. policy in the Asia-Pacific, with a focus on Taiwan and China-U.S. relations.
  • Amnesty International (https://www.amnesty.org/): Provides reports on human rights issues in conflict zones like Gaza.
  • RAND Corporation (https://www.rand.org/): Offers analysis and research on defense and security, relevant to U.S. policy in Ukraine and Taiwan.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Who Will Mitt Romney’s Successor Be?

Who Will Mitt Romney’s Successor Be?

Who Will Mitt Romney’s Successor Be?

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #119 | By: Courtney Denning | January 29, 2024
Photo taken from: www.motherjones.com
__________________________________

Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) is stepping down from his position in Congress, leaving a Utah Senate seat open in the 2024 election. Romney gained his seat in 2018 after his two bids for the presidency in 2008 and 2012, with him winning the nomination in 2012 but losing to Barack Obama. Prior to this, he served as the governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007.

In recent years, Romney has garnered attention for his criticisms of former president Donald Trump. He has frequently expressed his fears for the future of the Republican Party if it continues in the way he believes Trump is leading it.

The race for his former Senate seat exemplifies this growing divide in the GOP. Since Utah is an overwhelmingly conservative state, the winner of this seat will likely be decided in the Republican primaries on June 25, 2024. Although most are confident that a Republican will win the seat, there are stark differences in the ideologies of the candidates running for this Republican nomination. The winner of this race will signal whether the traditional “Romney Conservatism” or the emerging “Trump Republicanism” will dominate the state’s politics.

Analysis:

Here are profiles of the leading candidates to replace Romney:

Rep. John Curtis 

Curtis has been serving in Congress as a Representative of Utah’s 3rd district since 2017. An early survey taken even before he announced he was running for the spot placed Curtis as the front-runner for the election. Unlike other prominent Utah politicians, Curtis has not endorsed Donald Trump, but has promised to vote for him if he is chosen as the presidential nominee.

Brent Orrin Hatch 

Brent Orrin Hatch is running for the same seat that his father, Orrin Hatch, held for 42 years. Hatch has been running his own law private practice for the past 30 years, and he focuses his campaign on fiscal responsibility and decreasing the budget deficit. He has officially endorsed Donald Trump for president.

Brad Wilson 

Utah’s current Speaker of the House, Brad Wilson, is stepping down to run for the Senate as a self-proclaimed “conservative fighter” and Trump supporter.

Trent Staggs 

Staggs, the soon-to-be former Mayor of Riverton, UT, has also thrown his hat into the ring. In his campaign video announcing his candidacy, Staggs has endorsed Trump and set himself apart from Romney, saying that he’s “not a career politician or a Massachusetts millionaire.” Staggs is running in opposition to Romney’s legacy, criticizing his voting record and positioning himself as an uncompromising conservative.

Carolyn Phippen

Phippen, a former staff member for Utah Sen. Mike Lee, also represents a stronger conservative push for the Senate seat. She refers to herself as “not a politician” and publicly aligns with Trump. She is anti-federal spending, pro-life, pro-border wall, and staunchly conservative.

Josh Randall 

Randall’s campaign centers strong families and “Utah values” with an emphasis on Christian virtues. His run is set apart by a frugal budget. Randall said that he wants to model his political career after that of current Senator Mike Lee, a strong supporter of Trump.

Democrat Archie Williams III and Robert Newcomb of the Independent American Party are also running for Utah’s Senate Seat.

Most candidates running for this Senate position have been outspoken supporters of Donald Trump, marking a potential shift from the legacy left by Romney. The one candidate that could be expected to follow more closely in Romney’s ideological footsteps is Rep. John Curtis, who has not yet officially endorsed Trump.

Engagement Resources:

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Congressional Budget Struggles

Congressional Budget Struggles

Congressional Budget Struggles

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #118 | By: William Bourque | January 26, 2024
Photo taken from: www.finance.yahoo.com
__________________________________

The Congressional budget process is long and complex, throwing even the wonkiest of policy nerds for a loop. The biggest issue with the appropriation of funds is that the GOP doesn’t really want to do it. With Speaker McCarthy, GOP hardliners insisted that if he were to pass a continuing resolution that it would be the end of his tenure…and they weren’t bluffing. Speaker Johnson has put himself in a precarious position to say the least.

With a recently passed continuing resolution, Congress will have until March 1st for some agencies and March 8th for others. The legislation continues funding the government at current levels through that time, which hopefully allows time for a Republican-led House to get in order to pass a budget. The Senate, led by a slim Democratic majority, has generally been the leader in budget negotiations, with House Freedom Caucus members and inexperienced Speaker Mike Johnson struggling to find agreement.

The new agreement essentially gives the GOP more time to negotiate with the White House on immigration reform and Ukraine funding. Many GOP insiders say that they are likely to cave on the Ukraine funding if it means getting promises on harder immigration policy from the Biden Administration. In reality, the biggest spending fights this year will be on foreign spending on weapons and support for Ukraine and Israel, as well as the ongoing influx of immigration. The funding for Ukraine is something that is expected to be maintained, albeit at a lower rate. Funding for Israel, however, may be on the chopping block due to public opinion on the Israeli government’s actions in the occupied Gaza Strip. In a December poll by Pew, 59% of respondents believed that the Israeli government was at least partially responsible for the ongoing war. Biden’s support amongst progressives, Arab-Americans, and Americans under 25 has been waning over his handling of the conflict—and Congress will likely follow.

With immigration spending, many Republicans are focused on the Southern border, perhaps too much. Essentially, the Biden White House is going to make a deal with the GOP that they may have been aiming for anyways—but the GOP will provide sufficient political cover to make it happen. The money will likely be allocated for more border patrol officers as well as giving more ability to deport individuals who may be seen as high-threat. Immigration will be a top issue in the 2024 Presidential election, which is why Biden would be smart to take a harder line.

While they won’t be hugely controversial, there are a few other items that will be high-spend issues this year. Look for increased spending to come out of a final rule-making process for many government agencies as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law continues ramping up. These projects are key in many rural communities across the nation, and Biden will speak at length about this achievement on the campaign trail. Another huge Biden win was the Inflation Reduction Act, which is largely a climate and energy bill. Look for an increase in appropriations for renewable energy projects as well as transmission across the nation. This funding will be used to build utility-scale solar and wind power platforms as well as invest in the new hydrogen hubs program. Offshore wind projects are also becoming a present-day item, so expect to see increased funding in this year’s appropriations package—whenever it gets passed.

The controversial Congressional budget items will continue to be discussed up to the March 1st and 8th deadlines—with the ever-present threat of shutdown looming. Expect more of the same nonsense from Republicans, who will certainly lose their majority come January ’25.

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Situation Update: The Ukraine Crisis

Situation Update: The Ukraine Crisis

Situation Update: The Ukraine Crisis

Foreign Policy Brief #115 | By: Abran C | January 25, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.thehill.com

__________________________________

Fighting on the ground

For the past few weeks the two sides have been trading missile and drone attacks, most recently at least 25 people have been killed and 20 others injured after a market on the outskirts of the Russian-controlled city of Donetsk. In the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv at least 17 people have been seriously injured last week, after Russian missiles hit residential buildings in the city. Kharkiv lies just 19 miles from the border with Russia in Ukraine’s northeast and has come under frequent bombardment since the beginning of the war. Russian artillery has frequently hit civilian infrastructure in Ukraine drawing widespread condemnation.

Late last week four oil tanks at a large storage facility in the Russian town of Klintsy in its western Bryansk region caught fire after the military shot down a Ukrainian strike drone. The fire caused by the strikes forced Russia to suspend operations at a huge Baltic Sea fuel export terminal. Additionally a drone attack on a bus stop in the Russian city of Belgorod killed 25 civilians last month, the deadliest attack on Russian territory since the start of the conflict.

The tit for tat strikes are emblematic of the stalemate the war has come, with both sides able to inflict damage but with neither side being able to overtake the other. This winter Ukrainian forces have taken a more defensive position in many areas of the frontlines after a counteroffensive last year was unable to break through heavily defended Russian lines in the occupied territories.

Zelenskyy urges Western allies for more support

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in a recent speech at DAVOS has urged the West to tighten sanctions against Russia and step up its support for Kyiv to ensure that Moscow does not win the war.  The first months of the war in 2022 saw the country lose a third of its economic output to occupation and destruction because Russia controls the heartland of Ukraine’s heavy industry. President Zelensky called for some of the Russian billions seized by world banks to be sent to rebuild Ukraine. Though Europe’s central bankers have been skeptical about setting a difficult legal precedent that could undermine global financial stability. It would mean that other countries may think twice about placing their assets in the West if they know those same assets could be seized.

Arming Ukraine

Last week Russia’s top diplomat Sergey Lavrov rejected a US proposal to resume  dialogue on nuclear arms control, saying that it was impossible to engage in such talks while Washington provides military support to Ukraine. Lavrov charged that Washington’s push for the revival of nuclear talks has been driven by a desire to resume inspections of Russia’s nuclear weapons sites.  He reaffirmed that Russia will pursue what it calls the “special military operation” regardless of Western pressure.

Roughly $137 billion in military and financial aid to Ukraine remains stalled in Washington and Brussels. As a result individual European allies have begun to make bilateral pledges worth billions to provide arms to Ukraine this year. For example, Estonian President Alar Karis said last week that Estonia would provide 1.2 billion euros in military assistance including howitzers and ammunition over the next four years. Estonia, which also shares a border with Russia, stated last November that it was raising defense spending to 3% of its GDP and urged other European nations to double their expenditure. Last year most EU countries committed to an increase in military spending, a record $58 billion was allocated to military investments, and were geared overwhelmingly towards the procurement of new equipment.

Check out usrenewnews.org/Ukraine for more coverage on the Ukraine crisis. Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Facial Recognition: The Worst AI Has To Offer

Facial Recognition: The Worst AI Has To Offer

Facial Recognition: The Worst AI Has To Offer

Technology Policy Brief #107 | By: Mindy Spatt | January 24, 2024
Photo taken from: www.amnesty.org

__________________________________

Facial Recognition Technology uses software to evaluate similarities between face images. Computer generated filters transform images into numbers and symbols that cam be compared. It was what enables you to sign into your phone by just looking at it, and is also used to identify an individual in a database of photos or determine the similarity between two facial images

There’s no question that Facial Recognition Technology reflects and even enhances racial bias. Still, Vermont is the only state in the U.S. that has instituted a near total ban on it and only a handful of states limit its use. The technology’s earliest and most criticized applications have been in law enforcement, but other uses may be in the offing. The General Services Administration is carrying out a study to test potential racial bias in facial recognition technology systems that it is considering using as identifiers for accessing federal benefits.

Policy Analysis

The GSA’s announcement, in August 2023, describes current methods of facial recognition identity verification as “often inequitable.” These inequities have been documented by numerous advocates, academics, and critics. In an article in Scientific America titled ‘Police Facial Recognition Technology Can’t Tell Black People Apart’ in May of the same year, authors Thaddeus and Natasha Johnson said their research confirmed that inequities in policing can actually be exacerbated by the use of facial recognition, and concluded that law enforcement agencies that deploy automated facial recognition technologies over-arrest Black people. “We believe this results from factors that include the lack of Black faces in the algorithms’ training data sets, a belief that these programs are infallible and a tendency of officers’ own biases to magnify these issues.” The criticisms aren’t new, but, the authors note that despite efforts to improve the bias in facial recognition algorithms, it still mostly fails at identifying anyone other than white men.

Reading this, one might wonder: why bother? Shouldn’t the GSA and law enforcement be seeking technologies that promote rather than deny equity? How useful will it be in other fields, like healthcare? The Johnson’s research indicates that a bigger data set alone won’t cure the problem, since the ways facial recognition interacts with other racist policies and biases are the problem.

Amnesty International has criticized the way geographic racism and facial recognition technology interact, calling the technology “digital stop and frisk”. In a study of New York City, Amnesty found the that boroughs that were subject to high rates of discriminatory stop-and-frisks by law enforcement are the same areas where facial recognition is being most heavily deployed. Amnesty also correlated higher proportions of people of color with higher numbers of CCTV cameras with facial recognition components.

Gideon Christian, PhD, is a Canadian researcher who studies the racial and gender impacts of facial recognition technology. According to Christian, “There is this false notion that technology unlike humans is not biased.” In fact, he said, “technology has been shown (to) have the capacity to replicate human bias. Christian, whose research is funded by the Canadian government, found wildly disparate rates in facial recognition accuracy between white men- 99%, and black women-35%.

While states have been slow to take action, many cities have limited or banned the use of facial recognition by law enforcement including Portland (Both Maine and Oregon), San Francisco and Boston, New York city has yet to do so. Amnesty’s Matt Mahmoudi, an Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights Researcher, concluded that “Banning facial recognition for mass surveillance is a much-needed first step towards dismantling racist policing,” and Amnesty is urging New York to join the ban bandwagon.

Engagement Resources

Check out usrenewnews.org/AI  for more news on AI technologies and trends. Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

The Week That Was: Global News In Review

The Week That Was: Global News In Review

The Week That Was: Global News In Review

Foreign Policy Brief #114 | By: Abran C | January 22, 2024
Featured Photo taken from: www.vox.com

__________________________________

Surging violence in Ecuador

Ecuador has seen a sharp increase in violence and activity by organized crime in the last few months. The uptick in violence has taken homicide rates to unprecedented levels. Ecuador’s homicide rate surged from 13.7 per 100,000 people in 2021 to 25.9 in 2022. In 2023, it escalated further to about 45 per 100,000, placing Ecuador among the top three most violent Latin American countries, alongside Venezuela and Honduras.

Gang violence in the streets of Ecuador is related to unrest inside prisons, where overcrowding and lack of state control has enabled gang members to launch around 14 massacres that have taken the lives of more than 600 people since 2019. Ecuador’s president has declared war on gangs, many of which are responsible for the recent waves of violence that saw the storming of a TV station on-air and explosions around the nation that shocked the international community. The unrest appears to be in response to President Daniel Noboa’s efforts to tackle cocaine trafficking, in particular by putting gang leaders in new high-security prisons.

Ecuador borders cocaine-producing Colombia and Peru and has become a major shipment point. Both its neighbors have stepped up controls on their frontiers in response to the violence. President Noboa declared a 60 day state of emergency last Monday and a nationwide curfew from 11:00 pm-05:00 am every night.

Iran strikes Iraq, Pakistan, and Syria

On January 16, Iran launched missile strikes into Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, claiming to have hit two strongholds of the anti-Iran insurgent group Jaish al-Adl, what it calls an “Iranian terrorist group”, though Pakistan says it killed two children. Iran announced the attack in Pakistan at the same time as its strikes in Iraq and Syria. Pakistan stated the strikes were a clear violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Less than two days later, Pakistan hit back with fighter jets in Iran’s Baluchistan province claiming to have hit hideouts of anti-Pakistan insurgents operating from Iranian soil. Iran says three women, two men and four children were killed in the strike. Iran and Pakistan share a 560 mile border and the two, which normally share good relationships, have now had relations turn sour with the back and forth missile attacks.

In Iraq, Iran claims to have targeted an operations center of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency in its strikes. Yet Iraqi and Kurdish authorities instead say the house of a well-known businessman was hit. In Syria, Iran claims to have fired missiles at Islamic State militants in response to a bombing that killed scores of people at a commemoration for the famed Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani in central Iran on Jan. 3, 2024. The strikes by Iran in addition to other ongoing conflicts are stoking fears of a wider conflict that could engulf the entire Middle East and spread to other regions.

Ethiopia-Somaliland deal

Somaliland, a breakaway region of Somalia struck a deal with Ethiopia in hopes of being recognised as an independent country. For Somalia, Somaliland is an integral part of its territory. Somaliland is still not recognised by any country, Western governments are unlikely to recognise it until African countries do. The countries on the continent have held off, following the African Union’s longstanding policy against redrawing national boundaries inherited from colonialists. Without recognition, Somaliland struggles to attract investment and is cut off from international finance. For Somalia any suggestion that it could make a deal with another country or that parts of it could be leased without the approval of Somalia is highly contentious. Somalia has stated it is prepared to go to war to stop Ethiopia recognising the breakaway territory of Somaliland and building a port there.

Check out usrenewnews.org/globalnews for more Global News coverage. Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Can the Law Stop Trump from Becoming President?

Can the Law Stop Trump from Becoming President?

Can the Law Stop Trump from Becoming President?

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #117 | By: Abigail Hunt | January 23, 2024
Photo taken from: www.cnn.com
__________________________________

If there were a Guinness world record for most felony indictments by a U.S. President, Donald Trump would be the winner by a good margin. Trump faces 91 state or federal felony charges in four separate jurisdictions in New York, Georgia, Washington D.C., and Florida.  In New York, Trump faces a maximum total of 136 years in prison for 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree; the trial for these charges begins March 25. The federal elections case regarding Trump’s activities during the January 6th insurrection in the Capitol is set to begin March 4th and carries a maximum possible punishment of 55 years. In Georgia, Trump faces a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) charge. If convicted on a RICO charge, Trump must serve a minimum of five years in prison, the only charge which carries a minimum sentencing requirement; it has a maximum of 20 years. In addition, Trump faces 12 other felony charges in Georgia. Finally, in Florida, Trump faces 450 years for mishandling classified documents; the trial there begins May 20.

Politicians in several states are already attempting to remove Trump from the ballot, reasoning that he violated the 14th Amendment by his actions on January 6th, 2021, and is ineligible to run for President. The 14th Amendment provides for Equal Protection and Other Rights, and in Section 3, the Disqualification from Holding Office clause clearly states as follows:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

In Maine, the secretary of state removed Trump from the ballot, and in Colorado, the state Supreme Court did the same.  Trump is appealing the decision in both cases. In other states, such as Minnesota and Michigan, the courts threw out similar lawsuits on procedural grounds. In Oregon, the state Supreme Court, largely democratic, will make a decision soon on Trump’s ballot eligibility. In Massachusetts, courts will begin hearing the case January 22nd and must have a decision a week later.

The forecast for Trump House: Part Two still looks relatively good. Trump is the GOP frontrunner by a long shot – the nearest challenger is Nikki Haley, but her predicted chances for November stand at 12 percent compared to Trump’s current 68 percent ranking. What happens if Trump is convicted? The Hill published a survey of Trump supporters which showed that a quarter of them would no longer support Trump as their Presidential nominee if he were convicted. However, almost all of those surveyed felt the charges against Trump were undeserved, politically motivated, and, if you’ll pardon the pun, trumped up.

The thing is, Trump could be convicted in every case and still become President if he got enough votes. The only way the law could prevent a second Trump term through disqualification would be through the 14th Amendment clause. There are few requirements to become President of the United States – any candidate must be a natural-born citizen, have lived in the country for at least 14 years, and be at least 35 years old. Being a felon is not a disqualifier. It seems the only hope of limiting Trump’s second climb to power lies with Supreme Courts at the state and federal levels. Ultimately, discussion and debate regarding the outcome of the various state lawsuits and felony charges is just noise – none of it prevents Trump from becoming President again.

Engagement Resources

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

Governor Abbott and “Illegal Immigrants”

Governor Abbott and “Illegal Immigrants”


Governor Abbott and “Illegal Immigrants”

Elections & Politics Policy Brief #116 | By: Abigail Hunt | January 22, 2024
Photo taken from: www.bostonglobe.com
__________________________________

In the weeks leading up to Christmas, deep in the heart of Texas, Governor Greg Abbott signed a law into effect giving state law enforcement a broader right to arrest individuals crossing into Texas illegally (set to go into effect in March 2024) and directing the setup of flotation barricades and miles of razor wire barriers along the Rio Grande River. The physical deterrents so far have not limited the flow of illegal immigrants. It is estimated that in December 2023 a record 300,000 people crossed into Texas from Mexico. Despite the criminal enhancement for lack of documentation in crossing, and the decreased acceptance for asylum seekers, the flow of humanity crossing the southern border continues. Abbott’s decrees are violations of federal law and of a recent Supreme Court decision specifically about illegal immigrants, but that was in Arizona. Abbott is hedging his bets that the current Supreme Court, historically infamous already for its conservatism, will rule in his favor on what he believes is a valid state constitutional rights violation. Abbott is now on notice from the government regarding this federal violation of law.

In Eagle Pass, Texas, the New York Times spoke to citizens facing the real costs of immigration every day. Each month, the local fire department responds to an average of seven calls a day for emergencies related to people crossing the border – the ambulance cost for just these calls is $150,000/month.

The people crossing our border are coming from somewhere. In 2023, of the 2.4 million illegal immigrants crossing the southern border, most came from Mexico (717,333), Venezuela (266,071), Guatemala (220,085), Honduras (213,686), Colombia (159,539), Cuba (142,352), and Ecuador (116,229). Estimates from the Department of Homeland Security state that 4 million of those crossing the border have been expelled back to their own countries.

Because our government is run by people, like Governor Abbott, who grew up in the mid-20th century, they continue to use immigration policies and tactics previously shown to be failures. The fact is, the United States is a first-world nation that borders a third-world nation.  The opportunities available in the U.S. are a tempting draw for those whose lives are in real threat of violence daily. People do not leave a place where they are healthy and happy to move elsewhere. A failure to acknowledge the root causes means we will continue to struggle with an ever-expanding migration of desperate and destitute foreigners seeking solace and refuge, barriers be damned.

Engagement Resources

Get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist Democracy Weekly Newsletter, and please consider contributing to Keeping Democracy Alive by donating today! We depend on support from readers like you to aide in protecting fearless independent journalism.

x
x
Support fearless journalism! Your contribution, big or small, dismantles corruption and sparks meaningful change. As an independent outlet, we rely on readers like you to champion the cause of transparent and accountable governance. Every donation fuels our mission for insightful policy reporting, a cornerstone for informed citizenship. Help safeguard democracy from tyrants—donate today. Your generosity fosters hope for a just and equitable society.

Pin It on Pinterest