JOBS POLICIES, ANALYSIS, AND RESOURCES
Latest Jobs Posts
The Art of Brainwashing: Russia’s Mass Media’s Successful Project
Brief #146 – Foreign Policy
By Yelena Korshunov
Since the day when Russia started a so-called “special operation in Ukraine”, the iconic phrase of the average Russian has become “But all are afraid of us!”
When a Siberian grandma tells you that she doesn’t have heating, water, and electricity in her old house in February when the outside temperature falls to -13F and the air in her unheated bedroom is freezy, and her family still uses a wobbly wooden toilet in the backyard, she will proudly add “But all are afraid of us!”
Abortion: The Legal Challenges Continue Post Roe V. Wade
Brief #142 – Health & Gender Policy
By Geoffrey Small
The abortion battle in the U.S. justice system continues months after the Supreme Court overturned Roe V. Wade. Major federal, state, and city lawsuits are unfolding across the country, potentially setting legal precedents that will determine the future of reproductive rights.
Preview of US Senate Races in Arizona and Wisconsin
Brief #33 – Elections & Politics
By: Ian Milden
Control of the U.S. Senate will be up for grabs in the 2022 mid-term elections. Competitive races in key states will determine the balance of power. In this brief, I will preview the US Senate races in Arizona and Wisconsin.
Situation Update #12: The Ukraine Crisis
Brief #145 – Foreign Policy
By Abran C
This week marked an important date for Ukraine, August 24, 2022, which marks six months since the Russian invasion and the 31st anniversary of the countrys independence from the Soviet Union. The same day also saw a missile strike on an eastern Ukrainian train station that killed 22 people.
The Colorado River is Teaching a Lesson the Archeologists Know All Too Well
Brief #146 – Environmental Policy
By Todd J. Broadman
The Colorado River, a water source that irrigates 5 million acres of farm land and supplies 40 million people with drinking water, has long been severely overallocated. For decades, so much water has been diverted to supply farms and cities that the river’s delta in Mexico has dried up. Those that depend on its bounty are now in crisis as the western U.S. has undergone a 23-year megadrought and the nation’s largest reservoirs have subsequently dropped their water levels by three-quarters.
America’s Minimum Wage Debate: Is It Time for an Increase?
Brief #134 – Economic Policy
By Inijah Quadri
The current federal minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 an hour. Despite being below the poverty line for a country like the USA, the minimum wage has not seen any increase since 2009.
There has been some level of advocacy at the federal level, such as we had with President Obama in 2015, but nothing really was done to raise wages, even after his rallying cry. This has led to even more advocacy for an increase in the federal minimum wage, as increases regularly happen at the state level without any issues.
Protecting Digital Privacy With the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
Brief #193 – Civil Rights;
By Rodney A. Maggay
In early 2020 the Wall Street Journal first broke a story claiming that federal agencies were acquiring cellphone data information to be used for enforcement of immigration policies.
In response to the story, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agencies for the release of documents related to how the government acquires cell phone location information.
Powder Keg – How the War in Ukraine Could Disrupt the Global Skiing Industry!
Brief #144 – Foreign Policy
By Reilly Fitzgerald
The war in Ukraine has had an impact on global markets. Ukraine is a mass producer of wheat and other food items. They also are a manufacturing hub for alpine and cross country skis with a factory in Mukachevo, Ukraine, owned by Austrian-based company, Fischer Sports. Fischer is one of the leading manufacturers of skis and other skiing-related items such as ski boots and ski poles.
According to the Cross Country Ski Areas Association, based in Vermont, Ukraine produces half of the skis sold globally each and every year; globally there are around four million skis manufactured each year. This is not just a problem for Fischer but for most major ski companies who allow Fischer to manufacture at least some of their skis for them, these brands include Rossignol, Alpina, and Scott.
Who’s Missing from the Roe v. Wade Conversation?
Brief #141 – Health & Gender
By Chelsea Dade
Turn on the news and at least one of the segments will bring up the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. You might briefly hear about the case that got us to this point, Dobbs vs Jackson. When the Supreme Court issues its decision that the US does not confer a right to abortion, it overruled Roe v. Wade, as well as a related case, Planned Parenthood v. Casey. What happens next is states are left with the decision of whether to ban abortion.
How Texas Senate Bill 8 Opened The Door To Vigilante Laws And Why These Laws Pose Such A Danger
How Texas Senate Bill 8
Opened the Door to Vigilante Laws and
Why These Laws Pose Such A Danger
Civil Rights Policy Brief #186 | By: Rodney A. Maggay | April 5, 2022
Header photo taken from: Business Insider
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more civil rights policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: Society for Human Resource Management
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
In 2021 the State of Texas passed an anti – abortion law with a unique enforcement mechanism. Under the law, any private citizen could sue the person who tries to get an abortion, the doctor who performs the procedure or the clinic who provided the abortion procedure to a woman. If successful in the lawsuit the private citizen who brought the action would be entitled to $10,000. The bill was highly unpopular and was challenged in Texas state and federal courts. The case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court but the Court refused to suspend the law while the case was ongoing.
In response to the controversial enforcement mechanism of the Texas abortion law, copycat bills have been introduced in other states. Last month in Idaho, Governor Brad Little signed an abortion ban into law that was modeled on the Texas abortion bill. It also allows private citizens to bring private lawsuits against providers that perform abortions while also providing a monetary award for the plaintiff if successful. But the bills have not been restricted to only abortions. In Florida, Governor Ron De Santis has been vocal in his support for two bills – the Parental Rights in Education bill (popularly known as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill) and the Stop Wrongs To Our Kids and Employees bill (known as the Stop WOKE act). Both bills permit parents to sue schools and teachers if the schools teach critical race theory or speak to the students about gender and identity issues in the classroom.
As a response to these bills, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced that he was working with California state legislators on a bill that would permit private citizens to sue “anyone who manufactures, distributes or sells an assault weapon…in the State of California.” The bill was modeled on the Texas law where the plaintiff would also get a $10,000 reward if their lawsuit is successful.
Policy Analysis
While one aspect of the Texas abortion bill was its clear defiance of a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion by making it difficult to get one, the long – term effect of the Texas law is that it opened the door for other states to enact bills that could be viewed as “vigilante laws.”
One reason why the Texas abortion law is appealing to other states is because of the unique enforcement mechanism written into the law. Because the abortion law in Texas would be enforced by private citizens bringing private lawsuits, the law could not be challenged in a court of law. The way the law was written made the law immune from scrutiny. No court could overturn the law or declare the law unconstitutional since enforcement of the law lay with private citizens and not state officials or prosecutors. This unique structure gave rise to the term “vigilante law” since any private citizen, even one who had no connection to the parties involved (and in the Texas’ case the plaintiff bringing the suit did not even have to be a Texas resident), could simply walk into a courthouse and initiate a lawsuit. The plaintiff was given the power to decide who they wanted to sue and when. This obviously led to the copycat abortion law in Idaho and the two bills in Florida. There no longer had to be any worry that a court would declare a law unconstitutional and void because those laws as written could no longer be subject to any kind of judicial scrutiny or review.
But this new structure of writing bills is nothing more than a gimmick to make an end run around the Constitution and not follow certain laws and case law. The Constitution is supposed to be the supreme law of the land with a unique framework that provides and protects certain fundamental rights – free speech right, right to bear arms and the right against unreasonable searches and seizures among many others.
What Texas did was decide it did not agree with a woman’s right to an abortion and decided to enact a law denying that woman her right. And with the way the law was written the law could not be challenged in a court of law. Texas had found a way to deprive a person of their rights without being explicit about it.
Photo taken from: Alex Wong / Getty Images
(click or tap to enlargen)
But now other states have decided that if there is a right that they do not want a person to have that they can just follow the example set by Texas. Instead of nullifying a woman’s right to an abortion Florida and Governor De Santis have gone a step further and now decided that a teacher’s speech in a classroom on certain topics should be banned without any recourse for review in open court. Does anyone believe that only abortion, critical race theory or LGBQT issues will be the only issues that receive the “vigilante law” treatment?
If these types of laws are allowed to stand than it can only a be a matter of time before any random citizen is permitted at their whim to enforce a law against a fellow citizen that might deny another legal right – a private lawsuit that might deny the right to vote, a private lawsuit that challenges a neighbor’s immigration status, a private lawsuit questioning a friend’s reading of a banned book or even private lawsuits that touch on matters of religion.
“Vigilante laws” offer a direct threat to the rule of law in the United States. The Texas law is the most serious threat because it stubbornly refuses to comply and adhere with Supreme Court law – Roe v. Wade. But in the long term, it is the fact of giving private citizens the right to sue their family, friends and neighbors in a bounty style manner that causes the most concern. It is never a good thing to let people take the law into their own hands. So, it is imperative that the Supreme Court, or maybe even Congress, step in and stem the spread of private citizen lawsuits under laws that were designed to evade judicial review and scrutiny. LEARN MORE, LEARN MORE, LEARN MORE, LEARN MORE
This brief was compiled by Rod Maggay. If you have comments or want to add the name of your organization to this brief, please contact Rod@USResistnews.org.
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
Washington Post – good article on background of vigilante laws and the likely future of vigilante laws in the wake of Texas Senate Bill 8.
Reveal News – an investigative report in how Texas Senate Bill 8 was conceived and why it appealed to a right wing audience.
The Ukraine Crisis: Situation Update #7
The Ukraine Crisis: Situation Update #7
Foreign Policy Brief #152 | April 6, 2022
Header photo taken from: Axios
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more foreign policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: AP News
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
Ukrainian forces have retaken the Kyiv region and other surrounding areas over the weekend as Russian troops have begun a withdrawal from certain areas of Ukraine. The ongoing invasion has proven to be much more difficult than it seems Russian military officials had expected. About two-thirds of Russian troops have left the Kyiv region and are already in Belarus or on their way there. Though the withdrawal is seen as victory in holding back Russian forces, they are likely to regroup, resupply, and gather reinforcements which may instead intensify fighting later on in other regions. The Russian forces have begun what the Kremlin has termed “the second phase” of its operation where military focus will be on the Eastern part of the country. As they have withdrawn they have left behind large numbers of corpses littered across cities in the Kyiv region. Images of hundreds of people lying dead on the street in the city of Bucha have sparked international outrage.
On Monday April 4th, 2022, Ukrainian president Zelensky made his first trip outside of Kyiv since the beginning of the war, making his way to the city of Bucha to show the world what was left in the wake of the invading Russian forces. Zelensky said in one of his overnight addresses that over 300 people had been tortured and killed in Bucha. European leaders and the United Nations human rights chief in response joined the Ukrainians in condemning the bloodshed that was exposed after the Russians withdrew from the area. Meanwhile, Russian propaganda has claimed that the Ukrainian forces have staged the war crimes themselves. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that the grisly scenes outside Kyiv were a “stage-managed anti-Russian provocation”.
Policy Analysis
Zelensky has again appealed for more weaponry as it appears Russia is preparing a new offensive focused on the Eastern part of the country. The U.S. and allies have announced a new sanction package against Russia considering the increasing evidence of war crimes committed in Ukraine. The new sanctions will ban all new investments in Russia, increase sanctions on Russian financial institutions and state-owned enterprises, and continue to embargo Russian government officials and their family members. Russia is already facing a deep recession and high inflation, new sanctions will increasingly squeeze the Russian economy into what Western states hope will result in submission and cessation of hostilities.
Still, not all European states have condemned Russia in its invasion of Ukraine. After weeks of the world witnessing a united Western front against the war and increasing pressure from his European counterparts, Vladimir Putin enjoyed two victories this weekend as both Hungary and Serbia elected pro-Russian candidates.
Photo taken from: NPR
Although Serbia had previously backed two United Nations resolutions condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it remains almost entirely reliant on Russian gas and was unlikely to move far from Russia’s sphere of influence.
Yet the most significant victory came from the reelection of Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban. Orban has been openly pro-Russian and himself has close ties to Putin. Hungary is both a member of the EU and NATO and thus implicitly has approved sanctions against Russia, However Hungary has been a major hindrance in EU talks on banning energy imports from Russia.
Hungary under Viktor Orban has drifted away from its European neighbors in recent years, favoring closer ties to Putin’s authoritarian style of governance. What Viktor Orban will do now that he has secured reelection as a pro-Putin candidate, at the same time as reports and images of war crimes are coming out of Ukraine, and fresh rounds of sanctions against Russia are implemented remains to be seen. As Russian troops withdraw and regroup, we also await the next steps the Kremlin will take in its war and how it will react to further sanction and pressure from the U.S. and our allies.
As Cannabis is Increasingly Being Legalized, What Are Its Health Risks and Benefits?
As Cannabis is Increasingly Being Legalized, What Are Its Health Risks and Benefits?
Health and Gender Policy Brief #148 | By: Inijah Quadri | April 4, 2022
Header photo taken from: CannaCon
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more health and gender policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: NBC
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
In 36 states, medicinal marijuana is permitted, and in 14, it is lawful to consume marijuana recreationally. On the subject of legalizing marijuana, this article examines papers published in top economic, public policy, and medical publications, concentrating on the health repercussions of cannabis legalization.
Our article examines the impacts of legalization on adult and adolescent cannabis users. The legalization of recreational cannabis use in the US has drastically cut the price of cannabis, increased its potency, and made it more available to consumers. As such, the regular use of cannabis should be monitored. Cannabis legalization and regulation necessitate the study of the health repercussions of these policy changes, and this knowledge should be used to design ways of regulating marijuana that minimize negative health effects.
There is strong evidence that where medicinal marijuana is permitted, alcohol-dependent individuals consume less alcohol. However, the impact of recreational marijuana legalization on other critical public health outcomes needs to be discussed. Research is being done, but additional data needs to be obtained, allowing us to make more solid findings.
Policy Analysis
Cannabis is known by many different names: dope, weed, marijuana, hemp. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, cannabis is the second most often used psychoactive drug in the United States after alcohol and before nicotine. Cannabis is most often used by adolescents and young adults. Cannabis, formerly seen as a deadly gateway drug, is now more widely accepted as a drug that can be used on its own. Recreational marijuana use is increasingly legal in more and more places throughout the world.
So is it good for the populace? Is marijuana a gateway drug that should be avoided, or is it a cure-all? In the last several months, numerous studies have been released demonstrating both the dangers and the advantages of the hemp plant and its various compounds.
Researchers recently released the results of a study, which indicated that cannabis users have increased sexual function and greater orgasms. A reduction in fear and guilt (as a result of cannabis use) can lead to better sex, according to the experts. To put it another way, those who consume alcohol or smoke marijuana may have better sex.
On the other hand, contrary to popular belief, cannabis usage can cause long-term cognitive decline, especially in children and adolescents whose brains are still growing. There is a negative impact on decision-making and cognitive abilities, as well as on the amount of time it takes to accomplish mental tasks. And the effects of such “drunkenness” might last for a long time.
Photo taken from: WBUR
(click or tap to enlargen)
Another European research study, published in 2019, found that everyday marijuana smokers are three times more likely to suffer from psychotic episodes than those who do not use the drug. Another group of researchers found an eightfold increase in psychoses.
Advocates of legalizing cannabis argue that making it available at state-run dispensaries, as well as limiting the amount of THC in the medicine and requiring additives to be clearly labeled, will significantly lessen the substance’s health risks.
Proponents also argue that removing the stigma associated with being a cannabis user will allow for more open access to treatment and preventative programs. Without fear of repercussions from the law and/or public stigmatization, people might learn about the dangers of cannabis use and discuss their concerns with trained professionals who can help them.
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
Addiction (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.15764)
Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, Tripoli G, Gayer-Anderson C, Quigley H, Rodriguez V, Jongsma HE, Ferraro L, La Cascia C, La Barbera D, Tarricone I, Berardi D, Szöke A, Arango C, Tortelli A, Velthorst E, Bernardo M, Del-Ben CM, Menezes PR, Selten JP, Jones PB, Kirkbride JB, Rutten BP, de Haan L, Sham PC, van Os J, Lewis CM, Lynskey M, Morgan C, Murray RM; EU-GEI WP2 Group. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 May;6(5):427-436. Doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PMID: 30902669; PMCID: PMC7646282. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30902669/)
Gahr M, Ziller J, Keller F, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C. Increasing Proportion of Cannabinoid-Associated Psychotic Disorders: Results of a Single-Center Analysis of Treatment Data From 2011 to 2019. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov/Dec;40(6):642-645. Doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001278. PMID: 33009227. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33009227/)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/marijuana/what-scope-marijuana-use-in-united-states)
Roman, Pablo & Ortiz-Rodriguez, Ana & Romero-Lopez, Ana & Rodriguez-Arrastia, Miguel & Ropero-Padilla, Carmen & Sánchez-Labraca, Nuria & Rueda-Ruzafa, Lola. (2022). The Influence of Cannabis and Alcohol Use on Sexuality: An Observational Study in Young People (18–30 Years). Healthcare. 10. 71. 10.3390/healthcare10010071. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357478672_The_Influence_of_Cannabis_and_Alcohol_Use_on_Sexuality_An_Observational_Study_in_Young_People_18-30_Years)
Subbaraman M. S. (2014). Can cannabis be considered a substitute medication for alcohol?. Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 49(3), 292–298. (https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agt182)
Will the United States Adopt Europe’s Digital Markets Act?
Will the United States Adopt Europe’s Digital Markets Act?
Technology Policy Brief #56 | By: JA Angelo | April 3, 2022
Header photo taken from: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more technology policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: The New York Times
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
The European Union continues to lead the way in developing tech policies. In its most recent efforts, the EU passed the Digital Markets Act regulating big tech firms’ efforts to monopolize e-commerce, digital advertising, app stores, and other digital tools we rely on daily to organize our lives. The new law means that Google can no longer send targeted ads without its user’s consent and that Apple would need to offer mobile apps outside of the App Store. Violators of this legislation could be fined up to 20 percent of the company’s global profits. This could result in tens of billions of dollars. European standards are typically adopted around the world.
The Digital Markets Act was passed in large part in response to Silicon Valley dominating the Information Age. Watchdog groups mentioned the legislative efforts of lobbyists to water down the new law and the Biden administration’s efforts of stating that the Digital Markets Act targets American companies. This European regulation is applicable to those corporations whose market cap is over 75 billion euros, or $83 billion. The list includes Alphabet, the owner of Google and YouTube; Amazon; Apple; Microsoft; and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.
Policy Analysis
Although, both sides of the aisle in Congress have held high profile technology policy meetings, neither side has introduced digital media legislation to address tech giants unchecked powers amid the numerous antitrust cases filed against Google and Meta.
The United States has also not, thus far, adopted any European legislation addressing the digital world. This is in part likely due to tech giants lobbying Congress for these tech firms to maintain control over the digital marketplace.After all, these firms answer to their stakeholders. The absence of Congressional regulation minimizes the marketability of smaller mom and pop companies from profiting in the ever growing digital world.
The only way these smaller businesses have a shot at offering apps and other digital means to consumers is if the United States passes a set of digital regulations similar to those passed by the European Union. This would enable smaller firms to develop digital products at a fraction of the cost the tech giants offer. Well designed federal regulation can eliminate the tech monopolies and increase competition.
Photo taken from: EURACTIV, Shutterstock / Twin Design
(click or tap to enlargen)
However, one could argue that there are too many scams out there and that consumers prefer trusted tech giants. In the end, we as consumers, will likely continue padding C-level (CEO, CFO, COO etc.) executives pockets; perhaps driving these small firms out of business.
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
To advocate for the Digital Markets Act, The Information Technology Industry (ITI) Council, is one trade association that aims to provide fair competition in the digital world. You can find out more or donate to its cause at optics.org
Critics of the Digital Markets Act include the Chamber of Progress. The CEO of this trade group mentioned that the legislation targets United States businesses and will affect the American workforce. You can find out more about this group or donate to its cause at progresschamber.org.
House Votes to Decriminalize Marijuana: Manufacture, Distribution and Possession
House Votes to Decriminalize Marijuana: Manufacture, Distribution and Possession
Health and Gender Policy Brief #151 | By: Stephen Thomas |
April 3, 2022
Header photo taken from: Phonenix New Times
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more health and gender policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: MassLive (.com)
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
By a vote of 220-204, the U.S. House of Representatives Friday, April 1, passed the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act or the MORE Act aimed at decriminalizing the manufacture, distribution, and possession of marijuana. New York Democrat and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler introduced the legislation, an unsuccessful version of which the House passed in 2020.
The vote was virtually along party lines with 217 Democrats and only three Republicans voting in favor of the legislation.
Policy Analysis
Many states have already addressed cannabis legalization. 36 states and the District of Columbia have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes and 19 states and D.C. have decriminalized adult recreational use of cannabis, Nadler said.
“If states are the laboratories of democracy, it is long past time for the federal government to recognize that legalization has been a resounding success and that the conflict with federal law has become untenable,” Nadler said in his April 1 floor statement, adding that “criminal penalties for marijuana offenses, and the resulting collateral consequences, are unjust and harmful to our society. The MORE Act comprehensively addresses these injustices…”
Enforcement of existing federal cannabis laws have had ethnic implications, according to the MORE Act. Indeed, Section 2 of the measure states that “A legacy of racial and ethnic injustices, compounded by the disproportionate collateral consequences of 80 years of cannabis prohibition enforcement, now limits participation in the industry.” Additionally, as the bill reads, “Fewer than one-fifth of cannabis business owners identify as minorities [and] historically disproportionate arrest and conviction rates make it particularly difficult for people of color to enter the legal cannabis marketplace, as most States bar these individuals from participating.”
The primary active ingredient in this marijuana decriminalization legislation is the striking of the word Marihuana [sic] from parts of the federal Controlled Substances Act.
The National Cannabis Industry Association backed the bill. There is, however, organized resistance, which surely will make its voice heard in the Senate.
“The effort to end criminalization from marijuana offenses–which we fully support–is being used to obfuscate the recklessness of this bill as it relates to public health,” Smart Approaches to Marijuana President Dr. Kevin Sabet said in a statement April 1. “The proponents of this bill continue to propagate the myth that marijuana is harmless, based on research from 50 years ago.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki pointed out following the bill’s House passage that “President [Joseph R. Biden Jr.] said, during the campaign, our current marijuana laws are not working.
Photos taken from: Long Beach Post / Brandon Richardson; Getty Images
(click or tap to enlargen)
He agrees that we need to rethink our approach, including to address the racial disparities and systemic inequities in our criminal justice system, broaden research on the effects of marijuana, and support the safe use of marijuana for medical purposes.”
The bill ignores the very real mental health risks posed by today’s high-potency marijuana, which numerous studies have tied to the development of psychosis and schizophrenia. It includes little protection to ensure that the marijuana industry–backed by the major tobacco companies–isn’t marketing their products to minors and increasing the overall use of marijuana. As written, the MORE Act is a mess and irresponsible with respect to public health and safety considerations.”
According to Congress.gov, if the MORE Act passes in the Senate and is signed by the president, the measure would:
- Replace statutory references to marijuana and marihuana with cannabis
- Require the Bureau of Labor Statistics to regularly publish demographic data on cannabis business owners and employees
- Establish a trust fund to support various programs and services for individuals and businesses in communities impacted by the war on drugs
- Impose an excise tax on cannabis products produced in or imported into the United States and an occupational tax on cannabis production facilities and export warehouses
- Make Small Business Administration loans and services available to entities that are cannabis-related legitimate businesses or service providers
- Prohibit the denial of federal public benefits to a person because of certain cannabis-related conduct or convictions
- Prohibit the denial of benefits and protections under immigration laws because of a cannabis-related event (e.g., conduct or a conviction)
- Establish a process to expunge convictions and conduct sentencing review hearings related to federal cannabis offenses
- Direct the Government Accountability Office to study the societal impact of cannabis legalization
Unfortunately it is doubtful if the MORE ACT will pass in the Senate where Republicans are likely to filibuster and some Democrats may oppose the bill.
The results of a Gallup poll released Nov. 4, 2021, showed that 68 percent of respondents supported “legalizing marijuana.”
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
A breakdown of the House vote on the MORE Act:
Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives – Vote Details
Rep. Nadler’s Floor Statement:
National Cannabis Industry Association (Pro-MORE Act)
U.S. House & Senate Priority Legislation | NCIA (thecannabisindustry.org)
Smart Approaches to Marijuana (Anti-MORE Act)
Gallup Poll 2021
Support for Legal Marijuana Holds at Record High of 68% (gallup.com)
Russia Gets Shunned by the Sports World as a Result of its Invasion of Ukraine
Russia Gets Shunned by the Sports World as a Result of Its Invasion of Ukraine
Foreign Policy Brief #151 | By: Reilly Fitzgerald | March 30, 2022
Header photo taken from: Sky News
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more foreign policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: The Canberra Times
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has seen an outpouring of support for Ukrainians from every facet of the Western world. One of the largest initial reactions to the war has come from the sports world which banded together following the Olympics and showed a united front against Putin’s war. Numerous countries and sports leagues around the world took action, perhaps faster than governments did in condemning the violent and atrocious war in Ukraine. These reactions took place within hours and days of the start of the war.
Manchester United’s interim manager, Ralf Rangnick (a German), led his team and the opposing Watford team in a pre-match ceremony with a sign that said “peace” in several languages. Manchester City FC wore shirts with the Ukrainian flag on them during their pre-match routine to honor their Ukrainian teammate Oleksander Zinchenko. Norway, as a country, banned Russian athletes from competing in FIS World Cup nordic ski races. Russian tennis star, Andrey Rublev, wrote a statement on a camera lens that read “No War Please”, as an act of defiance against his country’s military action.
Policy Analysis
Exclusion from the world of sports is a serious show of soft power from various international organizations, it denies leaders like Putin the ability to put their country on display on a prestigious global stage. As we have seen throughout history, major international sports contests are highly linked to political events and aspirations of countries and leaders alike. The major global sporting events in the modern day are the Olympics and and the FIFA World Cup in soccer/football. Russia has been banned by both of these organizations.
The war in Ukraine is not the first time that Russia has been sanctioned by the sports community. Following their scandalous creation of a state-run doping program during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, there was a ban on using the name of “Russian Federation” and the usage of the Russian flag for athletes at the Olympic games. Instead, those athletes were referred to as “athletes from Russian” and most recently at the 2022 Beijing Games, they were called the “Russian Olympic Committee”. At the 2014 Olympic Games, hundreds of Russian athletes were complicit in this doping program that not only utilized performance enhancing drugs but actively used the Russian intelligence agency, the FSB, to surreptitiously compromise data relating to positive test results amongst Russian athletes and tampering with urine samples prior to testing for banned substances. Supposedly, the pressure of being the host nation for those Winter Games led the Kremlin to authorize this program.
Photo taken from: Peter Cziborra / Reuters
One of the largest continental sporting competitions, in Europe, is the UEFA Champions League football (soccer), which St. Petersburg was supposed to be hosting the final match in May. However, UEFA has reversed that decision and the final match will be played in Paris. Furthermore, all Russian teams in the Champions League’s preliminary rounds were banned from the competition, as well. Russia has also been entirely banned from the FIFA World Cup taking place in November and December in Qatar.
The soft power being exerted by non-governmental sporting organizations like FIFA, FIS, and many other sports bodies is rivaling the public perception that Putin has for so long tried to portray – one of being a part of the global community. This war, however, has proven how Putin does not intend to be a part of the community and abide by the norms of how nation-states are supposed to behave.
Participating in international sports competitions is a non-combative way for nations to show dominance against the other; the actions of competing make for great sport displays, but are also just as much political events.
According to the BBC, the sports in which Russia has been banned from international competitions are as follows: soccer (football), rugby, Formula 1, The Diamond League (Track and Field), WorldTour Pro Cycling has been Russian teams, World Rowing, Volleyball, Archery, Badminton, Basketball, and others. The show of unity across the sports leagues of the world has sent a strong message: Participation in these events is a privilege in the world, and not a right given to every country.
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
BBC Ukraine Crisis (https://www.bbc.com/sport/60568139 )
International Olympic Committee Recommendation (https://olympics.com/ioc/news/ioc-eb-recommends-no-participation-of-russian-and-belarusian-athletes-and-officials )
How COVID-19 Has Transformed Public Policy and Health Efforts
How COVID-19 Has Transformed Public Policy and Health Efforts
Health & Gender Policy Brief #150 | By: Katrenia Busch | March 27, 2022
Header photo taken from: The CDC
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more health & gender policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: Wuhan Virology Center
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
The crisis surrounding the 2019 coronavirus pandemic has far from ended. Over the past several months, the virus has continued to spread and infect new countries at an alarming rate. The long-term effects of the outbreak are likely to manifest in a number of ways, from economic setbacks and incarceration rates to paradigmatic shifts in health care administration. The United States as well as other countries need to begin formulating strategies for dealing with these issues .
. The efforts of medical professionals and public health experts, to understand and respond effectively to the contagious epidemic have not been entirely effective. We have seen that COVID-19 has a stronger impact on people’s health and well-being if they have symptoms like heart disease, diabetes, or pulmonary disease.
COVID-19 has also been linked to a greater risk of serious disease and death among racial and ethnic groups, according to new research. COVID-19’s detrimental impacts on patients with chronic illnesses are compounded by persistent socio-economic determinants.
Unstable housing, restricted access to nutritious food, insufficient transportation, and low socioeconomic position are examples of determinants of health that have brought these differences in clinical outcomes to light.
Policy Analysis
After the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government’s response proved to have a scope and scale not seen since World War II. The 2.2 trillion COVID motivated Stimulus Bill—even with its last-minute haggling—showed that Congress and the White House could work together in a time of emergency. It remains to be seen how this largest federal spending measure in American history will actually address the massive economic downturn; only time will tell.
In the wake of the COVID-19 virus outbreak, U.S.-China relations are likely to become more strained. The American public is being forced to recognize how much the U.S. depends on China for producing certain products that could help the country during its healthcare crisis, from N-95 masks to pharmaceuticals. In response, people are starting to ask for more oversight regarding where U.S. companies produce their health care products.
Photo taken from: Zurich (.com)
(click or tap to enlargen)
We can expect that the federal government will make policy and organizational changes in response to COVID-19. A good example of this is its response to 9/11, when it created a new agency to coordinate the government’s anti-terrorism efforts. Post COVID is likely that the government will increase its stockpiles of medical supplies and public health surveillance in anticipation of future pandemics..
COVID also is likely to have an impact on CDC and FDA regulations, including topics such as research-sharing, emergency medical device-manufacturing, and drug-testing.
The National Defense Production Act could be used to increase communication between government agencies and private sector companies in an effort to produce public health emergency supplies in a more timely manner (e.g., ventilators, masks, etc.)
New organizations may spring from the COVID-19 crisis, like the United States Council for Recovery (USCR), which was created by the Department of Health and Human Services and private sector companies to increase communications between government agencies and the private sector.
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20201120.456386/ “Ten Urgent Reforms to Protect the CDC and FDA from Harmful Political Interference”, Health Affairs Blog, November 24, 2020.
https://www.zurich.com/en/knowledge/topics/global-risks/covid-19-the-interconnected-consequences From John Scott, Head of Sustainability Risk, Zurich Insurance Group
World Economic Outlook Update, June 2020: A Crisis like No Other, An Uncertain Recovery June 24, 2020 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020
BBC News 11th March “Coronavirus: Up to 70% of Germany could become infected – Merkel” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51835856
https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/fdfa/fdfa/aktuell/newsuebersicht/2020/05/covid-19-ams.html
AGNA/CAF/CIVICUS (2020), Rebuilding for Good: Actions Needed from Government to Support and Sustain Civil Society, http://www.civicus.org/documents/Rebuilding4Good-FINAL2.0.pdf.
WHO (2020), “Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report – 13”, (accessed on 30 April 2020), https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf.
World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 191. Data as received by WHO from national authorities by 10AM CET, 29 July 2020
FT Article March 13th 2020 by Robin Wigglesworth “The week the World Changed: How a Markets Wobble Turned to Mayhem“ https://www.ft.com/content/86f7f914-6536-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5
FT Article March 13th 2020 by Ben Hall, Miles Johnson & Martin Arnold “Italy Wonders Where Europe’s Solidarity is as Coronavirus Strains Show”
https://www.ft.com/content/d3bc25ea-652c-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5
FT Article July 29th 2020 “Coronavirus tracked: the latest figures as countries reopen”
https://www.ft.com/content/a2901ce8-5eb7-4633-b89c-cbdf5b386938
FT Article July 19th by Jan-Werner Müller “The pandemic will strengthen smart populists”
https://www.ft.com/content/b9aca858-c17b-4c5f-8ce2-36b982489d95
Lessons for American Democracy from the Russian War with Ukraine
Lessons for American Democracy from the Russian War with Ukraine
U.S. RESIST NEWS EDITORIAL | March 28, 2022
Header photo taken from: The Moscow Times
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more editorials from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: BreezyScroll
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
Russia’s invasion and war with Ukraine has been unfolding in real time in front of our eyes. The war has succeeded in bringing out the courage of Ukrainian President Zelensky and the Ukrainian people and the ruthlessness and cruelty of President Putin and the Russian army.
The war also has many important lessons for American democracy currently in a state of disrepair. Presented below are examples:
Photo taken from: LaFargue, Raphael / ABACA
The moral strength of a democratically united country.
Tiny Ukraine, which has a third of the population of Russia has nevertheless put up a united front in the face of the Russian invasion. In similar situations in other countries, leaders would have fled and a country like Ukraine would have been easily occupied, e.g. witness Afghanistan. But the Ukrainians thus far have put up a united front that has been able to slow down the ability of Russia to meet its objectives. What was once thought to be a quick Russian conquest has turned into a conflict now entering its fourth week with no end in sight.
The importance of having democratic leaders who have the support of their people.
Certainly President Zelensky is a charismatic and courageous leader, but his success draws upon the fact that his government has the universal support of the Ukrainian people. You don’t have a political environment in Ukraine where bickering between rival political parties, such as in the United States, paralyzes the ability of the government to act.
The divisiveness that occurs as a result of media misinformation.
As a result of the Russia-Ukraine war we have gained an insight into the ways in which Russia controls the flow of information to its citizens, and the misinformation that results. It appears that most Russians have little knowledge about what Russia is doing in Ukraine. State-run media tells Russians that it army is seeking to liberate Ukraine from Nazis who govern the country. The government threatens with jail time anyone who calls its actions in Ukraine “a war.” Although thankfully America still supports free and open media information, several news organizations, such as Fox News, regularly spread disinformation in support of right wing and authoritarian political views. People in the U.S. who watch these channels can be led to believe that President Putin is “a genius,” and that his actions in Ukraine are justified.
Photo taken from: NBC
The impact of having a war where everyone fights.
In America up until 1973 there was a universal draft, known as the Selective Service System, that we used to fight our wars. All males between 18 and 37 had to register with the system and were eligible. To be called up to fight as members of one of our Armed Services. The Selective Service System democratized military service by making everyone participate. Wars were truly our country’s wars; much the way in which Ukraine is fighting its war with Russia. In Ukraine all males between the ages of 18 and 60 have been asked to fight. Everyone is a part of the war effort, making it into a national unifying operation.
The importance of standing up to authoritarianism.
President Biden has aptly termed the period we are living in as a battle between democracy and authoritarianism. Over the past few decades the world has witnessed the rise of authoritarian style leaders such as Xi in China, Bolsinaro in Brazil, Victor Orban in Hungary and of course Trump and Putin. Ukraine squarely and unabashedly rightly calls itself a democracy and has positioned its conflict with Russia as a battle between an authoritarian ruler (Putin) and a democratically elected government. Media coverage of the war in Ukraine has enabled people around the world to see the ruthlessness and cruelty that happens when an authoritarian, answering only to himself, is allowed to unleash an unprovoked war on another country. In standing up to Putin the Ukrainians are showing the world the importance of the need to challenge authoritarian regimes.
Photo taken from: Newsweek
The need to revisit the issue of nuclear disarmament.
The conflict in Ukraine has re-raised the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons and a larger global nuclear war; something that has not been talked about for decades. During the early stages of the conflict President Putin indicated he was putting Russia, which has an arsenal of over 6,000 nuclear warheads, in a state of nuclear alert. President Biden and European leaders, also in command of nuclear weapons, have gone out of their way not to take steps, such as a no fly zone, that could prompt Putin to launch a nuclear strike. The prospect of a nuclear war, long ignored by the world community has been reignited. Regardless of what happens in Ukraine the world has re-awoken to the danger of nuclear weapons and the need to control and disarm them.
The need for a better global system to address the world’s growing number of refugees.
Over 3 million Ukrainians have become refugees since the start of their country’s with Russia. Their suffering and needs are placing enormous strains on nearby countries to which many of them have fled. But the Ukrainians are only the latest group in a growing number of refugees made stateless due to wars, internal conflicts in their countries as well as climate change. But their plight further highlights for the global community to develop a new system for dealing with refugees and displaced persons that is appropriate for these troubled times.
So there is much we all should learn from Russia’s war of choice with Ukraine. It’s tragic it has taken such a horrendous war to teach us these lessons.
Free Speech Advocates Push Back Against The 1619 Project Culture War, Book Bans
Free Speech Advocates Push Back Against The 1619 Project Culture War, Book Bans
Education Policy Brief #51 | By: Lynn Waldsmith | March 27, 2022
Header photo taken from: Getty Images
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more education policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: The Pulse
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
As conservatives continue to inflame the culture war over “critical race theory” and curriculum or books that it labels as unpatriotic or offensive, free speech advocates are fighting back.
At the heart of the battle is “The 1619 Project”, the controversial and Pulitzer-prize-winning initiative that has drawn both praise and criticism. Created by Nikole Hannah-Jones for The New York Times, the project has since been made into a book and is being taught in some school districts and at the college level. The 1619 Project is a compilation of essays and reflections published in August of 2019 to mark the 400th anniversary of the start of American slavery. It essentially attempts to reframe the country’s history by suggesting America actually began in 1619 when the first slave ship arrived, rather than in 1776. The 1619 Project examines the contributions of Black Americans to building the United States and the far-reaching consequences of slavery.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and 38 members of his Senate GOP caucus, who want to remove the project from federal grant programs, last year called The 1619 Project “divisive” in a letter to Education Secretary Miguel Cardona.
Hannah-Jones said in response: “When you hear people like him saying that teaching the actual facts of American history are divisive, maybe that’s because we have a divisive history in this country. He’s not arguing that we shouldn’t teach the truth. He’s just saying that the truth is too difficult for our nation to bear and that we’re far too fragile to be able to withstand the scrutiny of the truth.”
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) authored the Saving American History Act of 2020, which would ban the use federal tax dollars for staff development in school districts that use or adopt parts of The 1619 Project curriculum. While that federal bill didn’t grain any traction, the free speech nonprofit group PEN America reports there have been 22 bills targeting The 1619 Project in different states since January of 2021. Fourteen of those are pending, while six failed or were withdrawn. Texas is currently the only state that has legally banned the project. Hannah-Jones says she believes many politicians have not read the curriculum and she encourages them to do so before criticizing it.
Policy Analysis
History experts have criticized Republican legislators for supporting bills that attempt to force teachers to gloss over parts of U.S. history, arguing the effort is closer to nationalism and indoctrination of students, rather than teaching them how to think critically for themselves.
One view of teaching American history is to instill a sense of pride in one’s country, while another view is to teach students about how history has shaped society. As a more diverse generation of historians emerged in the post-World War II era, historical research began to include sources that had been previously ignored, including slave narratives and oral histories of former slaves. That, in turn, brought in more voices and is reshaping and building the narrative, changing the way American scholars and the public view slavery.
While some historians have criticized parts of the project, the Times has stood behind it. The Pulitzer Center, in partnership with The 1619 Project, has made lesson plans available and says more than 4,000 educators from all 50 states have reported using its resources.
“What the project at its heart tries to do is explain our country to itself,” Nikole Hannah-Jones said at the University of Notre Dame earlier this month. “People talk about the project as if it’s a history, but it’s not a history. It’s actually about America right now, and it’s using history to explain how did we get the country we got.”
In addition to efforts to stifle teaching of The 1619 Project, renewed attempts to ban various books from schools have been back in full force. This was most notably seen in Glenn Youngkin’s fall 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election, which relied on campaign ads featuring a mother who pushed to ban Toni Morrison’s novel Beloved from her son’s curriculum.
But free speech advocates are fighting back. For example, when a York County, PA school district banned several books that focused on diversity last fall, a series of student protests prompted the local school board to overturn the ban.
Photo taken from: York Daily Record
(click or tap to enlargen)
Similarly, when a school district in a St. Louis suburb banned Morrison’s The Bluest Eye and several other books about race and gender, two students partnered with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Missouri to successfully get the decision reversed. Last month the Wentzville School Board reversed its decision in the face of the criticism and a class-action lawsuit.
The ACLU, PEN America and the NCAC have been working with local activists, educators and families around the country, helping them to mobilize opposition to book bans. The CEO of Penguin Random House, Markus Dohle, has said he will personally donate $500,000 for a book defense fund to be run in partnership with PEN.
Red, Wine & Blue is a national network of politically engaged “PTA mamas and digital divas” that offers online “Trouble Maker Training”, which includes such guidance as “Present a calm face to counter the yelling and shouting” and “Own individual freedom: You can decide what is right for your child, but you don’t get to dictate what’s right for other families.”
Diversity Our Narrative is another nonprofit that is helping students take on free speech battles. It has chapters across the U.S. with over 1,700 students in more than 200 school districts who are community organizers who advocate for education that does not avoid teaching about race, racism, and anti-racism.
The “windows and mirrors” concept developed by Rudine Sims Bishop, a renowned scholar in multicultural children’s literature, theorizes that books can serve either as “mirrors” to reflect and validate one’s own identity, or as “windows” to see new perspectives. It’s clear many educators, parents and students recognize banning books that are “windows” to other parts of society or history sets a dangerous precedent.
“You cannot heal divisions by pretending they don’t exist,” James Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, told The 19th, a nonprofit organization in reference to The 1619 Project. “The way to address divisions is to understand the history of those divisions.”
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on resource URL to visit links where available
The 1619 Project – The New York Times:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html
Senate GOP letter to Education Sec. Miguel Cardona
The Saving American History Act of 2020
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/4292
The Pulitzer Center/Teaching The 1619 Project:
Red, Wine & Blue
Diversify Our Narrative:
https://www.diversifyournarrative.com/
Pen America – Educational Gag Orders:
https://pen.org/report/educational-gag-orders/
Top 10 most challenged books of 2021:
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10
Situation Update #6: The Ukraine Crisis
Situation Update #6: The Ukraine Crisis
Foreign Policy Brief #150 | By: Abran C | March 28, 2022
Header photo taken from: Al Jazeera
Follow us on our social media platforms above
Browse more foreign policy briefs from the top dashboard
Photo taken from: The Sumter Item
Policy Summary
[SSB theme=”Official” align=”center” counter=”true” ]
Over a month into Russia’s assault on Ukraine, there still is no end. Russia’s attempt to conquer Ukraine has stalled and taken a much larger toll than many predicted. A lack of preparedness, supplies, and morale has caused a stalemate among ground forces. Yet as Russia’s advance has slowed, its air assaults have intensified. About 300 people are believed to have been killed in an airstrike by Russian warplanes on a theatre in the city of Mariupol. Ten million people have now fled their homes because of the invasion, with 6.5 million are displaced within Ukraine itself, and 3.5 million have fled to neighboring countries. The EU has granted Ukrainians fleeing the war a right to stay and work within the 27 member nations for up to three years. Refugees will also have access to social welfare, housing, medical treatment, and schools.
Russia has claimed it has completed the first phase of its “military operation” in Ukraine and would now focus on “liberating” eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region. The announcement appears to show that Russia may switch to more attainable goals because of fierce resistance to its incursion. Figures released from the Kremlin have put the number of dead Russian troops at 1,300 since the beginning of the invasion on February 24, 2022. NATO has put the estimated Russian death-toll at 7,000-15,000. Russian state news posted then quickly deleted an article that suggested 10,000 troops had been killed. Regardless of the disparity Russian forces have encountered huge losses. To mobilize manpower, Putin has appealed to foreign fighters from Syria, as well as private mercenaries, to assist Russia in its invasion.
Ukraine has accused Russian forces of taking Ukrainian citizens as hostages and sending them into Russia in a bid to get Ukraine to surrender. Russia has denied the claims and has said it is evacuating thousands of civilians of their own will.
Policy Analysis
Considering their setbacks, there is growing concern that Russia will turn to using chemical or nuclear weapons to break the stalemate its forces are currently in. Some members of congress have suggested that if Russia used either nuclear or chemical weapons in Ukraine and the effects of such weapons made their way into NATO states, it would be considered an attack on the alliance and force a response. Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island stated that “If a nuclear device is detonated, and the radiation goes into a neighboring country, that could very well be perceived as an attack against NATO”. President Biden, also on Friday after an emergency NATO summit, warned that were Russia to use chemical weapons it “would trigger a response in kind”.
President Biden last week went to Europe for a round of talks with allies, and to meet with refugees and US troops in Poland. Biden announced the US would take in up to 100,000 Ukrainians and provide an additional $1billion in food, medicine, water and other aid to Ukranian refugees fleeing the war. The president added that he would push for Russia to be removed from the G-20 group and not be allowed to attend the upcoming summit in Indonesia in October. He also issued a call for Putin’s removal.
Photo taken from: The Times of Israel
(click or tap to enlargen)
Russia’s economy continues to suffer because of sanctions. it is expected to contract 15% in 2022, leaving its GDP back where it was 15 years ago. Even more than the immediate hit of sanctions, Russia’s economy will probably continue to suffer years into the future as an increased exodus of educated and middle class Russians leave the country. This is happening at the same time as foreign companies continue to end or postpone business ties with Russia. Its relations in the region and exports with neighboring Eastern European states are also likely to suffer for years to come.
Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he was prepared to pledge that Ukraine wouldn’t join NATO in a bid to broker a peace deal with Russia. So far Putin has rejected calls for dialogue between the two countries.
Also, in a criticized move, President Zelensky announced that Eleven Ukrainian political parties would be suspended because of their links and sympathies to Russia. One party held 44 seats in the 450 seat parliament. He also stated Kyiv would shut down three television networks that he claimed worked to spread Kremlin-funded propaganda and signed a decree to unite all Ukrainian national TV channels into one platform. Though some have criticized his actions, Zelensky claims these measures were necessary in light of their anguished situation.