The 2024 U.S. Election and Its Impact on Domestic and Foreign Policy
Elections & Politics #141 | By: Inijah Quadri | December 23, 2024
Photo by The Now Time on Unsplash
__________________________________
Policy Issue Summary
The 2024 U.S. presidential election has concluded with former President Donald Trump securing a non-consecutive second term, defeating incumbent Vice President Kamala Harris. This outcome signifies a substantial shift in both domestic and foreign policy directions for the United States.
Domestically, the Trump administration has outlined plans to implement sweeping changes, including mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, significant tax cuts, and the establishment of “freedom cities.” These initiatives aim to reshape the socio-economic landscape, emphasizing conservative values and economic deregulation.
On the international front, the administration intends to adopt an “America First” stance, reassessing trade agreements, imposing universal tariffs—particularly targeting Chinese imports—and reevaluating the United States’ involvement in international alliances such as NATO. These policies are poised to redefine America’s role on the global stage, with potential implications for international trade and geopolitical stability.
Analysis
The administration’s proposed mass deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants represents one of the most aggressive immigration policies in recent history. This initiative is expected to have profound effects on communities, labor markets, and the economy. Critics argue that such measures could lead to labor shortages in key industries and humanitarian concerns, while supporters believe it will uphold the rule of law and national security.
In economic policy, the planned tax cuts and deregulation are designed to stimulate economic growth and enhance competitiveness. However, these measures may also result in decreased federal revenue and increased income inequality. The proposal to establish “freedom cities” reflects an ambition to create hubs of innovation and economic activity, though details on implementation and funding remain sparse.
Additionally, the administration’s focus on cultural issues, such as the elimination of wokeness in universities, indicates a commitment to countering progressive ideologies in education and promoting conservative values. This move is likely to intensify debates over academic freedom and ideological diversity in higher education.
Internationally, the administration’s intent to impose universal tariffs, especially on Chinese imports, signals a shift towards protectionist trade policies. While aimed at protecting domestic industries, such measures could provoke trade wars, leading to increased consumer prices and strained international relations.
The reevaluation of the United States’ role in NATO and the proposed push for a settlement in Ukraine favorable to Russia suggest a significant realignment of foreign policy priorities. These actions may undermine traditional alliances and alter the balance of power in regions like Eastern Europe, raising concerns among allies about America’s commitment to collective security.
Furthermore, the administration’s approach to international conflicts and defense strategies, including the potential use of military force to manage domestic protests, reflects a more assertive and unilateral stance. This posture may lead to increased domestic and global tensions, and challenges to international norms.
To ensure stability and equity in the administration’s approach, a balanced strategy is recommended across key areas. On immigration, pairing enhanced border security with pathways to legal status for contributing residents could preserve labor markets and uphold humanitarian values. Economic reforms should prioritize inclusive growth through tax credits for low-income groups, while international policies could emphasize multilateral diplomacy and cooperation to maintain alliances and global credibility. A transparent and consultative approach to implementing domestic and foreign strategies will also ensure broad-based support and long-term success.
Engagement Resources
Click or tap on the resource URL to visit links where available
- Council on Foreign Relations (www.cfr.org): Provides expert insights and analysis on how U.S. elections influence global diplomacy and international policies.
- Brookings Institution (www.brookings.edu): Offers in-depth research on the implications of U.S. domestic and foreign policies post-election.
- Center for Strategic and International Studies (www.csis.org): Engages in strategic discussions and provides analyses of U.S. military commitments and geopolitical strategies following the election.
Stay in-the-know! Always get the latest updates from our reporters by subscribing to the U.S. Resist News Weekly Newsletter. Your support is crucial in safeguarding fearless independent journalism. If you appreciate our content, please consider donating today to help protect democracy and empower citizenship.